I don't see feminist having any issues with misogynistic men as long as they are chads or thrid world rapefugees. A nerd looking at a foid is considered a creep while an Aids infested Tyrone is considered hot
Feminism is practically womens war on boring and undesired men
feminism = liberation from non chads
they still want to be chads cum dumpster
they still want to be chads cum dumpster
they only use them to virtue signal. most sand niggers do not get laid.
Sure, foids can't think properly when chad is around. They forget about their kids, hubby, how all males are same pigs, etc ... Only thing on their mind then is chad's dick.
feminism is so they have easier access to chad
feminism = extinction of men
They're just trying to open the way for polyamory so they can have betabux but also share chad, tradcucks and soys will of course shift all the blame on us
Feminism = war against the Dvine Providence. Females (and soycucks) that have these beliefs will have no respite when the day of the rope comes.
It's a double standard. Or just a shifting goal/ marker post of what means what.
With women, words don't mean what they mean. They only mean utility. And it's up to you to find out how that utility works in relation to their primal hierarchy-agenda.
Feminism/ women's rights is just used as a general slogan for (give me humanitarian help now) towards a certain person who gives her issues.
Since the majority of men are undesirable they will use it in the majority of situations. The majority of men, even if chad and tyrone are meant to be undesirable becaues the best out of all of them will be the goalpost which women will regard distinction of the lessers through.
Women will want to deprive the boring/ ugly/ undesirable of any power/ value/ merit/ humanitarianism under the wordplay of feminism, but their integrity towards women's rights is broken behind closed doors around attractive men, but since things can't be interlinked without you invading her space then it's never traced.
Women have no integrity. Their words/ moral qualms don't meant what they mean. They only mean utility, and hope that there are gonna be biters to their bait. And most men have cucked themselves to it.
With women, words don't mean what they mean. They only mean utility. And it's up to you to find out how that utility works in relation to their primal hierarchy-agenda.
Feminism/ women's rights is just used as a general slogan for (give me humanitarian help now) towards a certain person who gives her issues.
Since the majority of men are undesirable they will use it in the majority of situations. The majority of men, even if chad and tyrone are meant to be undesirable becaues the best out of all of them will be the goalpost which women will regard distinction of the lessers through.
Women will want to deprive the boring/ ugly/ undesirable of any power/ value/ merit/ humanitarianism under the wordplay of feminism, but their integrity towards women's rights is broken behind closed doors around attractive men, but since things can't be interlinked without you invading her space then it's never traced.
Women have no integrity. Their words/ moral qualms don't meant what they mean. They only mean utility, and hope that there are gonna be biters to their bait. And most men have cucked themselves to it.
feminism = "I refuse to take this non chad looks any longer"
all women need to be beaten brutally
all women need to be beaten brutally
feminism is not that. its cancer
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
