Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Female Journalist: "Maybe Sexbots Will Make MEN, Not Women, Obsolete"

Red Shambhala

Red Shambhala

Death to America
★★
Joined
Nov 10, 2017
Posts
2,566
Hoping that sexbots and artificial wombs will soon liberate us from this feminist society is one of the most naive and cringe-worthy ideas circulating in antifeminist circles. 

A female Bloomberg journalist now raises the blackpilled thought that, "Maybe Sex Robots Will Make Men, Not Women, Obsolete."

Actually, I think it’s the men who should be worried. It’s entirely possible that robots can outperform them.

Perhaps it’s time for a Big Think. Are women not as capable as men of crude objectification? There’s room here for everyone’s impure thoughts and desires. Robots don’t discriminate, and they can probably give good massages.

Don’t get me wrong, I have a good husband. I doubt I would trade in. But if I had a daughter, I might consider giving her a robot as a college graduation present. Preferably one who can do the dishes and guard the door.

And yes, I do think women could get spoiled by dashing menbots. Their standards might go up. They might even be lost to the dating pool altogether — like what’s already happened with some Japanese men. 

Would that be such a bad thing? In the #MeToo age, I feel like raising standards is quite reasonable. It’s called for, in fact. Make the men compete. 
https://archive.is/cNKGR

Not so blackpilled but rageful is obviously this notion that women don't have high enough standards yet, and that men don't have enough competition yet. This is obviously female hypergamy at its worst. However, this idea that "women are also capable of crude objectification" and that theoretical sexbots might turn out worse for men than for women is an interesting thought.

Especially, since poverty is increasingly masculine and business power is increasingly female or at least feminist. Men even struggle to create alternatives to feminist social media platforms - who says that they would be able to create alternatives to feminist robots from Silicon Valley.
 
But the only reason femoids have any business power is because of WKs. If you could get pussy from a robot, WKs would cease to exist.
 
Robots/androids would have to have sentient AI to fully fulfill the desire for a significant other. Without sentient AI, it would be nothing more than a masturbation tool, and a large and presumably expensive one at that.

Who knows if AI will advance that far within our lifetimes though? It's at least 30 years off, and possibly much further off than that.
 
Stopped reading at "make men compete"

Oh wait
 
>make the men compete

wat
 
"Their standards might go up"

5/100 in 2025
 
Why are sex bots more natural than being gay?
 
It's just going to make human sex obsolete for both genders. Everyone will be fucking virtual Chads and Stacies and not thinking about humans sexually anymore.

In the future, you will never be able to date a woman without getting cucked by virtual Chad. Even real Chads can't compare to a computer simulation with a 30 inch cock. All men will be cucks, and women will only marry men who are willing to betabux. This will most likely lead to relationships dying off completely. The entire human race will be foreveralone.
 
Red Shambhala said:
Especially, since poverty is increasingly masculine and business power is increasingly female or at least feminist.

jfl if you really believe this.

5tPFXz.jpeg


Women are only able to compete with men in the business world because they are being propped up by white knights and the system itself.

Everything from how the education system is structured, to female college scholarships, to mandatory employment quotas for females, female nepotism once they get into upper management ... is geared toward empowering women and creating handicaps for men, and even with all of this men still outperform women and contribute the lions share of tax revenue.

Men still build pretty much everything. Men still hold most STEM degrees and design pretty much everything.

If men were equally supported and not gimped by the system, and if companies hired people based on merit and qualifications, then women would be back in the kitchen.

So it's 100% BS that a male sex robot for women could replace men. What do women really want from men? They want attention, they want status and they want free or easy money. A sexbot can maybe provide attention, but not really even that. If a woman gets a sexbot because she can't find a man, she is a fucking loser. Literally any woman can get a boyfriend, it's super easy for them. So a sexbot would decrease a womans social status. Many women commit legit suicide if their social status is doomed.
 
A dildo can outperform any men out there, yet women are still craving for chads cock.
 
lol @ this female implying that the standards for men isnt already through the roof with the advent of tinder and social media. I will rope they day this shit happens.
 
Women are going to design and build robots? LOL good luck there. Of course if betas don't pull their heads out of their asses I suppose THEY might stupidly make male sexbots for femoids with already unrealistic standards.

Still though, I feel that making an artificial dick that isn't just a glorified dildo would be much harder than making an artificial pussy.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top