R
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...FjAAegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw172YGWgyTVMlEjEPp8DaN5
Things she got right:
- Admitted lookism is real and we are truly discriminated against for being ugly.
- Admitted the swiping social media culture is destroying men.
- Admitted that men now feel greater pressure than women to be physically attractive.
Things she got wrong:
- Tried to use false equivalence between being the wrong race/height/face for a man and being fat for a woman. Typical foid tactic. Anyone can lose weight naturally by eating less so this is bullshit.
- Continues to claim we feel "entitled" to women despite most of us accepting evolutionary biology which specifically dictates the fittest (ie. Chads) should be expected to reproduce with the broadest number of foids. WANTING something very strongly is not the same as feeling ENTITLED to it. Eg. I want to be attractive enough to get women. It doesn't mean I think I an owed a hot woman just because I have a penis. Men are disposable and probably if I'm honest I should be dead already. In history I probably would have died from war.
- Focussed on good looking mentalcels instead of commenting on what actually short, ugly, ethnic men experience in the dating market. As always this is just too scary a topic for women or reporters. It is impossible for a liberal female writer to acknowledge how racist or heightist her gender is, because it would undermine her greater "SJW" agenda. Women only seek justice for a protected class which includes women, gays, and transexuals. They don't care about the fact that >30% of Indians and Chinese have been eliminated by women from the dating market in the past 10 years.
Still we're making progress. The fact that they can't stop talking about us should tell you something.
Things she got right:
- Admitted lookism is real and we are truly discriminated against for being ugly.
- Admitted the swiping social media culture is destroying men.
- Admitted that men now feel greater pressure than women to be physically attractive.
Things she got wrong:
- Tried to use false equivalence between being the wrong race/height/face for a man and being fat for a woman. Typical foid tactic. Anyone can lose weight naturally by eating less so this is bullshit.
- Continues to claim we feel "entitled" to women despite most of us accepting evolutionary biology which specifically dictates the fittest (ie. Chads) should be expected to reproduce with the broadest number of foids. WANTING something very strongly is not the same as feeling ENTITLED to it. Eg. I want to be attractive enough to get women. It doesn't mean I think I an owed a hot woman just because I have a penis. Men are disposable and probably if I'm honest I should be dead already. In history I probably would have died from war.
- Focussed on good looking mentalcels instead of commenting on what actually short, ugly, ethnic men experience in the dating market. As always this is just too scary a topic for women or reporters. It is impossible for a liberal female writer to acknowledge how racist or heightist her gender is, because it would undermine her greater "SJW" agenda. Women only seek justice for a protected class which includes women, gays, and transexuals. They don't care about the fact that >30% of Indians and Chinese have been eliminated by women from the dating market in the past 10 years.
Still we're making progress. The fact that they can't stop talking about us should tell you something.
Last edited:
