Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

News Fakecel Nathan Larson's legal discussion thread (September/October 2021)

PPEcel

PPEcel

cope and seethe
★★★★★
Joined
Oct 1, 2018
Posts
29,087
Nathan Larson


Background

Already covered extensively so will be brief.

Nathan Daniel Larson (@Leucosticte), a father, former husband, congressional candidate, ex-convict, and banned .is member, was arrested in December 2020 after allegedly flying from his home in Virginia to kidnap a 12-year-old Californian girl.

Larson was indicted on five federal charges related to this incident. If convicted on all counts, he would face a maximum of three life sentences plus fifty years.



Recent developments

In July, Larson was transferred from the Fresno County Jail to MDC Los Angeles, a federal BOP facility, for a court-ordered mental examination. That examination is scheduled to be completed by September 11th, and Larson will be returned to the Fresno County Jail thereafter.

The examination is being conducted by psychologists Lisa Matthews and Samantha Shelton of the BOP.

The next hearing has been delayed by two weeks to September 17th (thread will be updated then). Judge Dale A. Drozd is assigned to the case.

@BummerDrummer @Caesercel @Honeypot @BlkPillPres @Azaylias @-BrettyBoy- @commander_zoidberg @shii410 @Mogged Loner @Arthas93 @rope2cope @your personality @Dregster666 @dreadtheblackpill @ordinaryotaku @notafed @Edmund_Kemper
 
Damn. Is he in prison for life?
 
When you realize a convicted pedophile is mogged by 90% "incels" here, had a wife and better life than you before going to prison.:feelsohgod:
 
didn't he have an ex-wife and a current GF or something

he wasn't an incel just used our name for shock value to get media attention
 
he wasn't an incel just used our name for shock value to get media attention

He did. But he does have a few supporters here.
 
lmao stereotypical groomer face

low IQ for throwing his life away like that going after rich American girls, could've gone to Thailand or something.
Groomer
 
Last edited:
I don't understand why he'd throw his life away like that, there has to be something missing here.
He's mentally off

He peed on a classmate in high school

He wrote a letter to the Secret Service about killing Bush/Obama, earning him a stint in the fed pokey

He got released, and then wrote a letter to his probation officer saying that he doesn't intend to do anything the feds say, so he got sent back to the fed pokey...twice

In a custody hearing for his daughter he admitted to and defended writing online posts about how based it would be to use his cock as a pacifier. The jury did not like that.
 
Defended it? As in he made it clear that what he said was unironic? :dafuckfeels:
It is difficult to tell how serious he was.

I mean, his content was indeed rather shocking.

2e794ovxjld51
 
Jfl he @BummerDrummer and @MountainGorilla homie
They love his white nationalist but fucks gook ways
:feelskek:
 
It is difficult to tell how serious he was.

I mean, his content was indeed rather shocking.

View attachment 487523
The best one I've heard in my life is - "If she can crawl, she can bawl" :feelskek:

nathan-larson-jpg.487505

I don't know why guys keep this weird "balding" look, he'd look much better with it all shaven off
 
nathan-larson-jpg.487505

I don't know why guys keep this weird "balding" look, he'd look much better with it all shaven off
Man, getting bald is a nightmare

Absolutely brutal
 
It is difficult to tell how serious he was.

I mean, his content was indeed rather shocking.

View attachment 487523
Pedophiles tend to be exuberant when talking about their deviance and odd attractions.

The most fucked up thing I read was one user said 'first comes the blowjob training then the potty training'
 
cant be a fakecel if he never claimed to be an incel
 
:feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek:

Now that's fucked up
JFL
cant be a fakecel if he never claimed to be an incel
He had a bizarre view of inceldom even by our standards.
He's federally fucked now. He's clearly not all there mentally but there's no way 2 psychobabble foids are going to sign off on it.
I guarantee he's going to spend at least the next three decades in prison or an institution. I mean, his quality of life in either scenario won't be great. There's a good chance he won't ever get out. Even if he does, he'll probably be on lifetime supervised release, which means he can't even watch porn without asking his probation officer for permission. It's incredibly over.

The shrinks get their paycheck from the feds, of course.
 
Last edited:
Why do you guys consider him a fakecel?
He applied the JBW theory, the statusmaxxing theory and the moneymaxxing theory and didn't work
1630601703113

Man, getting bald is a nightmare

Absolutely brutal
Even if shaving isn't a complete solution. Its better to be shaved than have that style.
 
Last edited:
Why do you guys consider him a fakecel?
He applied the JBW theory, the statusmaxxing theory and the moneymaxxing theory and didn't work
View attachment 487626

Even if shaving isn't a complete solution. Its better to be shaved than have that style.
He's 6'2 and white.

He's a father.
 
lmao stereotypical groomer face

low IQ for throwing his life away like that going after rich American girls, could've gone to Thailand or something.
View attachment 487512

I should probably just throw out there that over 40 countries have extended extraterritorial jurisdiction in child sexual exploitation cases.

If Larson instead flew to Thailand and had sex with a child prostitute there, he could face federal charges when he returned to the U.S. under the PROTECT Act, specifically 18 U.S.C. §2423 (b) and/or (c). Such prosecutions are not uncommon.

The U.K. and Canada have similar provisions.
 
just go completely bald why even hold to that hair
 
I should probably just throw out there that over 40 countries have extended extraterritorial jurisdiction in child sexual exploitation cases.

If Larson instead flew to Thailand and had sex with a child prostitute there, he could face federal charges when he returned to the U.S. under the PROTECT Act, specifically 18 U.S.C. §2423 (b) and/or (c). Such prosecutions are not uncommon.

The U.K. and Canada have similar provisions.
yeah, but in poor countries shit like this isn't enforced very well. He'd have a better chance going to some poverty-stricken shithole and do whatever he wants to do there than in America.
 
yeah, but in poor countries shit like this isn't enforced very well. He'd have a better chance going to some poverty-stricken shithole and do whatever he wants to do there than in America.
It's not necessarily about how well shithole countries enforce the law. With respect to U.S. law on child sex tourism, the extraterritorial provisions apply even if the conduct is legal in the country where the offense occurred. Th[UWSL]e U.S. could easily build a case in the event, say, CBP decides to randomly search his electronic devices at the border when he returns. [/UWSL]
 
Larson's hearing transcripts from February and April 2021 were released today.

His arraignment in February 2021:


Here's an interesting segment where he argues with a judge about having to wear a mask if he goes to the courtroom in person:

Judge McAuliffe: But I will -- I will let you know, Mr. Larson, that -- that if we have an in court -- when we have an in court proceeding, and we go through the Faretta inquiry, I will require you to wear a mask. That is just the way things are in our courthouse. That's the rules of the courthouse. You have to follow the rules. If you object to that at the time of the hearing, the hearing will be over. That's just how things are because we -- every person has to wear a mask coming into the court and for any proceeding in the court. Do you understand that?

Larson: Why do you do it that way rather than overruling the objection and letting me preserve? Why do I have to withdraw the objection?

Judge McAuliffe: Why do you have to what?

Larson: Why do I have to withdraw the objection? I'm wondering why you don't overrule it and let it be preserved for appeal.

Judge McAuliffe:
Well, because I'm willing to -- you may have a right to be in court for a personal appearance as opposed to video, but you do not have a constitutional right to not wear a mask. There is no such thing. And so in -- in our courts, that is required. And so what I'm saying to you is, I can set a hearing for in person, but when we're there you will be wearing a mask. That's just -- that is what's going to happen. And to the extent you're saying I need to overrule your objection to not wear a mask, then I will overrule that. And if you continue -- if you -- if you don't want to wear a mask then the hearing at that time will be ended. It's kind of like a forewarning of what might happen. And I don't want that to happen. I want -- I want to be able to go through the substance of what you are asking.

@BummerDrummer JFL entertaining as always
 
Larson's status hearing continued to October 15th, 2021.
 
Larson's status hearing continued to November 12th, 2021.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top