I think face is above all. Even if your race affects the value of your face, with decent bone structure you can find a gf at least despite being curry or rice.
Blackpill Face vs race, which one is the ultimate blackpill?
Face in the West.
Race in the third world.
Race in the third world.
Easily face, if you have a good face no matter what race you can get foids. Being a certain race won't fix an ugly face.
height, if your a manlet,
Face, race, height in that order
Your race shapes your face and there’s also the -3 theory that @13k came up with. The stakes are higher for ethnics most foids exclude ethnics at an extremely high level. White halo is real and is so fucking strong. Being ethnic is as bad as being 5’4 according to the studies.
Last edited:
Cope go visit the must read section.
definitely race
RACE is the number one factor of whether or not you are respected
RACE is the number one factor of whether or not you are respected
Race in some instances like it’s over for you’re curry. But if you’re white with kind of a bad there might be some hope if you have height on your side
What does "the ultimate blackpill" even mean?
You can change your face in some cases but you can't change your race
Either way face is more important than race
You can change your face in some cases but you can't change your race
Either way face is more important than race
P
very true
Race is mostly and spin off of height and face. Color is practically in a third plane.
The reason why 'Hispanics' and a good chunk of Middle Easterns outperform blacks is because they share height but these 'Hispanics'/Middle Eastern win in looks.
The reason why blacks outperform most curries and ricemen is because height.
However race is too simplistic. Not all Middle Easterns aren't the same, no all 'Hispanics' are the same.
I don't know how many people call themselves blackpilled and haven't understood that.
Whites mog because they have the best stats(mostly compacted in looks and face). The blue eye and snow skin halo are important but secundary in comparison of the first two stats. . Plain and simple.
The reason why 'Hispanics' and a good chunk of Middle Easterns outperform blacks is because they share height but these 'Hispanics'/Middle Eastern win in looks.
The reason why blacks outperform most curries and ricemen is because height.
However race is too simplistic. Not all Middle Easterns aren't the same, no all 'Hispanics' are the same.
I don't know how many people call themselves blackpilled and haven't understood that.
Whites mog because they have the best stats(mostly compacted in looks and face). The blue eye and snow skin halo are important but secundary in comparison of the first two stats. . Plain and simple.
Fuck those JBW mfs face is everything look at jeermey meeks the dude is brown skinned and bald but still slayes man 
Race. Those who are not tall and White...are undesired.
The Hispanics you say outperform blacks are essentially white guys with a little native ancestry and a Spanish surname. Surely you can't mean little brown Pedro from Guatemala
There´s a difference between whites Hispanics. Probably most white Hispanics in U.S are either Cubans(white Cubans are actually Spaniards) and others European leaning mixed people who who were in New Mexico and Texas before U.S took it over
And non-white Hispanics who mog blacks face-wise who identify with Hispanics.
And then you have incel tier Hispanics that you may talk about.
Is cope to think that Hispanics mog other ethnics coz the ones who do that are white. They are other three shades of mixed Hispanics who mog the rest of ethnics with difference (Castizoids, Harnizoids and Mestizoids). Only Amerindian leaning mixed people fall in the same category as ethnics.
Last edited:
If you ask me, You prefer to be white normie or worst or to be the most beautiful indian that ever existed I take the indian.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
