Blackpill Evolution is a bitch

[Linesnap99]

I have a low iq and I am all alone. I got nothing better to do.

Did Stone-Age Men and Women Sleep Around and Should We Care?

Sexual anatomy and function provide clues to cheating ancestors.

www.psychologytoday.com

ALPHA FUCK BETA BUX:You can read more about this on the link above.

"Marriage is a contract. All contracts imply potential conflicts of interest. Men cheat on their wives (1). Women deceive their husbands - more often than is generally appreciated. Perhaps a tenth of the children in a marriage are conceived extramaritally (according to genetic tests 2)"...

"Women are also more swayed by physical attractiveness in choosing a lover than they are in selecting a husband."
"Women prefer physically attractive men as extramarital lovers. Because attractive men are more sexually exciting, cheating women are more likely to reach orgasm during their extramarital coitus than they are during marital intercourse. Translation: they are shopping for good genes and bias the chances of being impregnated by their extramarital partner rather than the husband."

"Even the shape of the human penis with its large glans and prominent coronal ridge seems designed to scoop out rival sperm (3). If men are adapted for sperm competition, this implies that ancestral women were fooling around. "
"orgasm occurs more often among women who have many sexual partners and a stronger sex drive."....

NNN / On the prehistoric origins of modern sexuality

nextnature.net

This article talks about sexuality and life in hunter gatherer society

"We are attracted to novelty. We’re attracted to novelty in music, in film, in food, in travel; in virtually every aspect of our lives. Human beings are always attracted to something that’s new. So why should our sexuality be any different? That makes no sense."

"We’re told that sexual passion and intimacy run parallel, but in fact they run away from each other. Sexual passion fades because novelty fades."....

Sex in the Stone Age: Pornography in Clay

New pornographic figurines from the Stone Age have been discovered in Germany. But researchers can't agree on what the 7,000-year-old sculptures mean. Were our ancestors uninhibited sex fiends, or was reproduction strictly controlled to improve mobility? An increasing number of finds seem to...

www.spiegel.de

Another interesting article

"Only the weak masturbated, Darwin believes

Darwin theorizes that instead of lust and eroticism, the Early Stone Age was dominated by constant strife. The strongest men took harems, while the weaker males were homosexual or began (like the chimpanzees) to masturbate. Weaker males, according to the Darwin, could also have taken their revenge and murdered the leaders. Sigmund Freud believes that in order to put an end to permanent unrest and make living within a social community possible, upright man came up with the world's oldest moral law: totemism, a sort of early religion that associated a group with a specific symbol or set of symbols. Although this system helped bring about peace and orderliness, it also tended to impose a restrictive code of sexual abstinence on the individual.".....

 

[RoboticSubHuman]

It's Over for Cavemancels

 

[grondilu]

Women are also more swayed by physical attractiveness in choosing a lover than they are in selecting a husband."
"Women prefer physically attractive men as extramarital lovers. Because attractive men are more sexually exciting, cheating women are more likely to reach orgasm during their extramarital coitus than they are during marital intercourse. Translation: they are shopping for good genes and bias the chances of being impregnated by their extramarital partner rather than the husband."

This confirms a pet theory of mine : female sexual desire evolved only for cuckolding.

https://incels.is/threads/the-amoun...-that-sub8-theory-is-true.169078/post-3590847

That being said, there is a bit of a paradox, though. By being a provider, the husband has shown his evolutionary fitness in the sense that he was capable of extracting resources from the environment. Why didn't female desire evolve to favor this kind of men ? What is Chad's fitness other than his ability to seduce married women ? Arguing that it is only that would be a circular reasoning.

My explanation is in the difference in evolutionary pressures for men and women, and how it drives females towards koinophilia.

The main evolutionary pressure for females is childbirth. Before modern medicine, childbirth was very risky, possibly because of the so-called obstetrics dilemma.

Of course it is advantageous for a female to mate with a capable male, but it is also very advantageous for her to mate with a male who will reduce the risk of childbirth as little as possible. It's less important for the male because the male can just get an other wife if one dies during childbirth. He can also cut the foetus out of the womb if need be (C-section has existed possibly for as long as humans were able to cut flesh. As a reminder, the name comes from Julius Caesar, the greatest Roman Emperor, who was born this way.).

So what male phenotypes indicate a lower risk of childbirth ? IMHO, it's the most normal phenotypes, those who present the fewest anomalies, even if these anomalies were the reason the male was exceptionally competent. Thus the concept of averageness and koinophilia.

Averageness - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

In a nutshell, Chad's fitness consists in his ability to make childbirth safer. The husband's fitness consists in his ability to thrive in the environment.

The female needs both, thus the dual mating strategy.

 

[Neggr]

epic AVI

 

[Linesnap99]

This confirms a pet theory of mine : female sexual desire evolved only for cuckolding.

https://incels.is/threads/the-amoun...-that-sub8-theory-is-true.169078/post-3590847

That being said, there is a bit of a paradox, though. By being a provider, the husband has shown his evolutionary fitness in the sense that he was capable of extracting resources from the environment. Why didn't female desire evolve to favor this kind of men ? What is Chad's fitness other than his ability to seduce married women ? Arguing that it is only that would be a circular reasoning.

My explanation is in the difference in evolutionary pressures for men and women, and how it drives females towards koinophilia.

The main evolutionary pressure for females is childbirth. Before modern medicine, childbirth was very risky, possibly because of the so-called obstetrics dilemma.

Of course it is advantageous for a female to mate with a capable male, but it is also very advantageous for her to mate with a male who will reduce the risk of childbirth as little as possible. It's less important for the male because the male can just get an other wife if one dies during childbirth. He can also cut the foetus out of the womb if need be (C-section has existed possibly for as long as humans were able to cut flesh. As a reminder, the name comes from Julius Caesar, the greatest Roman Emperor, who was born this way.).

So what male phenotypes indicate a lower risk of childbirth ? IMHO, it's the most normal phenotypes, those who present the fewest anomalies, even if these anomalies were the reason the male was exceptionally competent. Thus the concept of averageness and koinophilia.

Averageness - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

In a nutshell, Chad's fitness consists in his ability to make childbirth safer. The husband's fitness consists in his ability to thrive in the environment.

The female needs both, thus the dual mating strategy.

But now they can get all in one. and I understand why r/deadbedroom exist. Pathetic.

 

[dirtykombatcel]

Moral of the story

Chad and the women win.
Sub par men are basically slaves.

 

[Linesnap99]

Moral of the story

Chad and the women win.
Sub par men are basically slaves.

Yeah. the simps made it so. and i blame feminist.

 

[Black Soul]

Good morning, I hate evolution

 

[FinnCel]

Even the shape of the human penis with its large glans and prominent coronal ridge seems designed to scoop out rival sperm (3)

Honestly, I do not think this is true.
If you look at this from the perspective of circumcised penis, yes it does seem that way.

But if you take a look at uncircumcised penis, the head of the penis merely holds the foreskin back

 

[error of nature]

Good thread.

 

[TheNEET]

water is wet tbh
I hate everything about this gay Earth

 

[Sportbro]

water is wet tbh
I hate everything about this gay Earth

me too,but we have to find a way to live this life

 

[Mainländer]

Evolution is a lie. What we really have is "in"volution, if anything.

 

[Made in Heaven]

"Women are also more swayed by physical attractiveness in choosing a lover than they are in selecting a husband."
"Women prefer physically attractive men as extramarital lovers.

Of course, as you say, AFBB. A lover doesn't need to be a husband, a lover only provides the genetics. It's the husband who provides the wealth, land, shelter, clothing, emotional support, and raising the kids. So these women want it both ways, to have the optimal genes they can get their hands on as well as the optimal money/land/food their beta cuck husband can provide.

Of course, such a problem would be near non-existent in society if Islamic values were embraced