AshamedVirgin34
Sexlessness survivor
★★★★
- Joined
- Nov 4, 2022
- Posts
- 1,383
Many feminists say that it does not make sense to classify people according to whether they are virgins or not, since virginity is a social construct, however, it does make sense to classify people according to the rejection they receive, it does make sense to create a hierarchy that places people according to how much they are rejected, rejection is not a social construction, it is something quite real that does not depend on me, but on others, others decide whether they reject me or not, others are in control, rejection is not subjective, it is an objective reality that exists whether you accept it or not. A virgin man who has been rejected all his life is a completely different type of man than a man that women desire and pursue, and therefore they should be classified in two different social classes.
There are two social classes: the class of the rejected (us), the ugly people who can't choose the sex lives they want, and the privileged class of those who can choose, and the only way to eliminate this humiliating hierarchy is to eliminate sex and make the humans of the future reproduce in laboratories, that is my utopia, that is the future I dream of, a future without rejection or sex, a clever way to get back at those privileged sexhavers is to destroy their privilege.
There are two social classes: the class of the rejected (us), the ugly people who can't choose the sex lives they want, and the privileged class of those who can choose, and the only way to eliminate this humiliating hierarchy is to eliminate sex and make the humans of the future reproduce in laboratories, that is my utopia, that is the future I dream of, a future without rejection or sex, a clever way to get back at those privileged sexhavers is to destroy their privilege.
Last edited: