I
good
He is likely ugly and only "bisexual" so he has a get-out-of-jail free card from being incel and is willing to accept being a faggot. So that's why females refuse to date him. Not rocket science
S
True. Women would date a good looking bi man immediately.
„He is hot and woke like me“
He's ugly and/or short, poor thing doesn't know that's the reason women won't date him. If anything bisexual men are a turn on for women.
Cope, in 90% of cases you can immediately tell if a man is gay and it's a massive turn off for foids. They are attracted to masculinity and dominance and you're neither dominant nor masculine if you let another man fuck you up the assTrue. Women would date a good looking bi man immediately.
„He is hot and woke like me“
99% of women will obviously not desire to date a guy who takes in the ass. She views you as a faggot bro sorry about that but you should have thought about this before taking cocks in your ass.
Surprisingly soyyitors are in her body her choice mode in the comments(I thought LGBT males are more oppressed than straight women in soycuck oppression hierarchy, that's surprising). I wonder how would they react if it was bi woman complaining about men not dating her.
Surprisingly soyyitors are in her body her choice mode in the comments(I thought LGBT males are more oppressed than straight women in soycuck oppression hierarchy, that's surprising). I wonder how would they react if it was bi woman complaining about men not dating her.
Gigachad would get a pass for being bi but I am sure average women have higher Chad barrier for bi men
Not really. Women want violent and dominating men. Knowing that their man got sodomized/dominated by other men would turn most of them off.
I dont considerate bi men real fags they are just guys that lower their standars to get more holes
for me only trannies and homos are real fags bi are just degenerated guys
for me only trannies and homos are real fags bi are just degenerated guys
I think it goes like this: race > gender > sexual orientation.Surprisingly soyyitors are in her body her choice mode in the comments(I thought LGBT males are more oppressed than straight women in soycuck oppression hierarchy, that's surprising). I wonder how would they react if it was bi woman complaining about men not dating her.
Faggots in particular have always just been useful idiots. Ever since they managed to legalize gay marriage nobody cares about fags anymore, trannies are the new "civil rights frontier"
S
Boomer moment if you still think women want masculine menCope, in 90% of cases you can immediately tell if a man is gay and it's a massive turn off for foids. They are attracted to masculinity and dominance and you're neither dominant nor masculine if you let another man fuck you up the ass
no man, young women like this woke shit including bi men (if good looking)
Last edited:
I just can't see a woman rejecting a chadlite because she thinks he takes it up the ass, I'm not gonna pretend I know much about the subject though so I'll leave at that.99% of women will obviously not desire to date a guy who takes in the ass. She views you as a faggot bro sorry about that but you should have thought about this before taking cocks in your ass.
Surprisingly soyyitors are in her body her choice mode in the comments(I thought LGBT males are more oppressed than straight women in soycuck oppression hierarchy, that's surprising). I wonder how would they react if it was bi woman complaining about men not dating her.
Gigachad would get a pass for being bi but I am sure average women have higher Chad barrier for bi men
Not really. Women want violent and dominating men. Knowing that their man got sodomized/dominated by other men would turn most of them off.
Perhaps usually but a few years ago a foid porn star and a bimale porn star had a beef in social media. Wokes took the man's side and bullied foid to suicide, so perhaps not always
Zoomer moment. Only young foids want pretty boys. 30s and up all want manly, muscular, alpha men
Yes, in a slacktivist way for societal validation/attention
Nope. Most would draw the line at their partner having AIDS. Women just want to look woke, they don't want to actually put any effort for retarded woke shit.
I do not claim expertise neither but it is against female biology and blackpill for them to desire sodomites.
They're just virtue signaling, if anything masculinity standards have gotten higher. Just a few decades ago the bearded ripped lumberjack look was seen as disgusting, now it's the beauty standard.
Also that. Trannies are a whole another league of insane and hysterical compared to rest of the LGB so we are stuck "progressing" towards their ever growing inane demands.Faggots in particular have always just been useful idiots. Ever since they managed to legalize gay marriage nobody cares about fags anymore, trannies are the new "civil rights frontier"
...? You'd rather be a single mom slayer than a teen slayer?
There are no studies in the subject and I can provide no anedoctes, but common sense says looks should trump here.
It's not a black and white and/or case though. There are young foids who want manly men and old foids who want pretty boys, it is just that general inclination in age groups are different. Manly Chad can still slay young foids and pretty boy Chad can still fuck MILFs if he wants.
The difference is when you are a manly Chad other men too respect and fear you, unlike being a prettyboy where you are seen as an effeminate faggot by other men. So overall it is better to be manly Chad, you won't run out of women to fuck anyway.
Looks are the most important but there are limits to even that. Most foids wouldn't fuck a retarded Chad. Think about this in a similar way.
S
I am 35. Women want tall and good looking men, that’s what I see every day
Ofc they don’t want a bf with AIDS jfl. Have you been in a big western city the last 5 years? You underestimate how prepossessing the woke movement for young women in big cities is.
Im not reading anything that a fucking literal faggot wrote
Yeah but I think it would still need to be a primal disgust for a woman to reject a Chad because of faggotry, I feel like a woman thinking at a conscious level he takes it up the ass is not powerful enough to trump looks. It's not like female promiscuity which men have evolved to watch out for so they could guarantee their offspring was indeed theirs, that woman would need to be raised to hate faggots to think that way.
Fuck bitches
If you are going by the evolutionary explanation route you can argue that as homosexual men carry diseases more often, women evolved to be aversive of them so that they and their offspring wouldn't get infected with anything nasty.
Evolutionary psychology is a bit of a pseudo-science so this is not a conclusive evidence of anything, but if you are interested in approaching the problem from that angle, that's my take.
I don't think any of us can convince each other of the contrary of what we believe tbh, since there's no hard evidence for either of our sides. Also this is a pretty inane topic to discuss on this forum of all places. Not sure why you think evolutionary psychology is pseudo-science, you religious? It's definitely not a very developed field but what I said is pretty agreed on by the people who study it.
Tbh I agree on lack of conclusive proof for either way.
No pretty irreligious. I believe in evolution. But evolutionary psychology is different.
Science requires hypotheses and said hypotheses being tested and improved according to test/observation results until a solution to problem is reached.
Evolutionary psychology(also extend to most of psychology in general) is not based on this experimental method. There are no tests to be done to verify and reproduce purported findings(also a problem that extends to most "soft sciences")
You have a result that you prefer/like/believe in and you come up with myths to justify them post facto. No tangible evidence of any kind is presented in evolutionary psychology other than very shaky and nebulous arguments that appeal to biases, beliefs or logic.
Reductivism of complex biological phenomena to a single factor or a simpler set of factors is also a methodological problem.
Perhaps if it was more closely integrated somehow to anthropology, biology and neurology it would have been a more valuable field.
So isn't evolution and you still believe in it.
K
If he was chad looking, every foid would try to convert him back to heterosexuality.
Not really, there is plenty of biological proof that it is real
You can trace a lot of evolutionary history with carbon dated fossils
As well categorizing the genome of different species to highlight genetic links
Carbon date method is faulty. I heard about an an example, where they sent the Investigation object to three different investigation institutes with different indications and got in each case 3 completely different answers. Microevolution is observable, macroevolution (creation of new species) is not.
Ok, but wrong topic.
Ok, but wrong topic.
First of all you forgot to tag me, I didn't get notified on your reply
Even ignoring archeology, it has been in fact observed in recent history
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2014/02/evolution-in-real-time/
Drastic changes in bacteria was observed in laboratory after thousands of generations.
Some interesting questions to ponder:
Why do humans have pseudogenes(some of them found in other animals) that have no effect on our phenotype? How do you explain this besides relic of our evolutionary history?
Why do human embryos have tails that disappear on later stages of baby growth?
Why do so many blind animals that live in caves their entire lives have non-functioning eyes?
All other great apes have 24 pairs of chromosomes as opposed to 23 pairs of humans. The second chromosome of humans have telomeres in the middle. Telomeres usually only occur at the end of the chromosomes. Most scientists believe that this is caused by fusion of these chromosomes on our ape ancestor. With respect to all the other overwhelming genetic similarity we have with other apes(98-96%) isn't it too much of a coincidence?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC52649/
Give this a read as well
https://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/
Ok cool conclusion based on a totally well sourced single anecdote
But yes first of all carbon dating isn't 100% accurate and error prone. But it is still a well-researched method that is backed by current chemical models and it gives a good general idea. You can't dismiss millions of pieces of archeological evidence because of that.
Nope
Even ignoring archeology, it has been in fact observed in recent history
https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2014/02/evolution-in-real-time/
Drastic changes in bacteria was observed in laboratory after thousands of generations.
Some interesting questions to ponder:
Why do humans have pseudogenes(some of them found in other animals) that have no effect on our phenotype? How do you explain this besides relic of our evolutionary history?
Why do human embryos have tails that disappear on later stages of baby growth?
Why do so many blind animals that live in caves their entire lives have non-functioning eyes?
All other great apes have 24 pairs of chromosomes as opposed to 23 pairs of humans. The second chromosome of humans have telomeres in the middle. Telomeres usually only occur at the end of the chromosomes. Most scientists believe that this is caused by fusion of these chromosomes on our ape ancestor. With respect to all the other overwhelming genetic similarity we have with other apes(98-96%) isn't it too much of a coincidence?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC52649/
Give this a read as well
https://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/
I mean you started it
As with a lot of fags, they can’t get a gf, so they become the gf
Last edited:
That’s cope there’s lots of pretty boy and chad homos that could easily slay
Tbh I also wouldn't date a "bi woman"
Bisexual is basically a codeword for "insane perverted whore", especially if we talk about women
Bisexual is basically a codeword for "insane perverted whore", especially if we talk about women
In Prison, you’re only gay if you’re the one taking it in the ass. If you’re the one doing that fucking then you’re not gayCope, in 90% of cases you can immediately tell if a man is gay and it's a massive turn off for foids. They are attracted to masculinity and dominance and you're neither dominant nor masculine if you let another man fuck you up the ass
Faggots
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
