IncelCatechumen
Self-banned
-
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2021
- Posts
- 1,333
Clearly arranged marriages are necessarily dysgenic (most of the times): undesirable individuals get the opportunity to reproduce inadvertently creating a future generation of incels. This might explain why there are so many curycels and ricecels in western societies: their ancestors were subject of arranged marriages and now they are suffering from the genetic consequences of that initial sin. The genetic degradation of the minor Austrians in Spain during the reign of the Habsburgs served as an example of this phenomena.
Of course, in the short term, arranged marriages might be beneficial to incels, but what about the long term consequences of this inhumane act? It seems that in western societies it's not going to be possible to return to traditional societies and the Islamic ethos feels like a far-fetched option (for the Islamic enthusiast of this forum: I simply don't think islamic societies are any better for incels than western ones: many islamic countries have insane female-to-male ratios, crazy numbers of pornography consumption, and also of male virginity).
For arranged marriages to be a "thing" again we need to revert and, as I said, there are no possible returns, as long as we have a service-oriented economy we are going to have feminism and the social values that are related with it (i'm quoting the marxist Marvin Harris here).
So in conclusion, do you guys think that we should ask for a voluntary sterilization in order to have an aesthetics-based eugenics? I mean, sperm banks and artificial insemination are partially like this, as you know, women´sexual preferences in atomized societies tend to be worst than 19th century eugenicists: they want white, tall, blue-eyes vikings with High IQ´s: maybe incels are a product of the NWO and their eugenic goals. I'm starting to think about that possibility although it sounds nuts...
Edit: This would go hand-in-hand with the ethical system of negative utilitarianism. The syllogism goes by this:
We need to reduce suffering
Inceldom is a life of suffering
Eugenics solve aesthetic deficiencies in the long term
Therefore, we should support eugenics
Of course, in the short term, arranged marriages might be beneficial to incels, but what about the long term consequences of this inhumane act? It seems that in western societies it's not going to be possible to return to traditional societies and the Islamic ethos feels like a far-fetched option (for the Islamic enthusiast of this forum: I simply don't think islamic societies are any better for incels than western ones: many islamic countries have insane female-to-male ratios, crazy numbers of pornography consumption, and also of male virginity).
For arranged marriages to be a "thing" again we need to revert and, as I said, there are no possible returns, as long as we have a service-oriented economy we are going to have feminism and the social values that are related with it (i'm quoting the marxist Marvin Harris here).
So in conclusion, do you guys think that we should ask for a voluntary sterilization in order to have an aesthetics-based eugenics? I mean, sperm banks and artificial insemination are partially like this, as you know, women´sexual preferences in atomized societies tend to be worst than 19th century eugenicists: they want white, tall, blue-eyes vikings with High IQ´s: maybe incels are a product of the NWO and their eugenic goals. I'm starting to think about that possibility although it sounds nuts...
Edit: This would go hand-in-hand with the ethical system of negative utilitarianism. The syllogism goes by this:
We need to reduce suffering
Inceldom is a life of suffering
Eugenics solve aesthetic deficiencies in the long term
Therefore, we should support eugenics
Last edited: