It is often argued that escortcels are still incels because they need to pay for sex, which normies get for free, or that their experience with escorts lack emotional factors like love and emotional connection.
My counterarguments are as follows:
A) Inceldom is a condition, like hunger. If you're hungry and have access to food, whether it's a home cooked meal cooked or a meal you paid for, you have solved your hunger problem. Likewise, as an incel, if you have access to sex with escorts, you've solved your problem of involuntary celibacy. The fact that you paid for it is irrelevant.
B) The lack of love and emotional connection when engaging with escorts are also irrelevant to inceldom for the simple reason that those factors are not prerequisites for being classified as involuntarily celibate. If seeing an escort does not invalidate one's inceldom, then it can just as well be argued that Chads who've only ever experienced loveless flings and one night stands are also "incels". The difference is that the escortcel offers money, while the Chad offers his looks and physique. This, obviously, is absurd to even think about.
In conclusion, escortcels get to have sex and are therefore non-celibate. Thus, they are not incels in the truest sense of the word. I wouldn't necessarily call escortcels "fakecels", but it's objectively true that they are sexhavers and are thus outside the fold of inceldom.
At best, escortcels are somewhere between normies and incels.
My counterarguments are as follows:
A) Inceldom is a condition, like hunger. If you're hungry and have access to food, whether it's a home cooked meal cooked or a meal you paid for, you have solved your hunger problem. Likewise, as an incel, if you have access to sex with escorts, you've solved your problem of involuntary celibacy. The fact that you paid for it is irrelevant.
B) The lack of love and emotional connection when engaging with escorts are also irrelevant to inceldom for the simple reason that those factors are not prerequisites for being classified as involuntarily celibate. If seeing an escort does not invalidate one's inceldom, then it can just as well be argued that Chads who've only ever experienced loveless flings and one night stands are also "incels". The difference is that the escortcel offers money, while the Chad offers his looks and physique. This, obviously, is absurd to even think about.
In conclusion, escortcels get to have sex and are therefore non-celibate. Thus, they are not incels in the truest sense of the word. I wouldn't necessarily call escortcels "fakecels", but it's objectively true that they are sexhavers and are thus outside the fold of inceldom.
At best, escortcels are somewhere between normies and incels.
Last edited:
Cope. You have access to escorts. You're just not brave enough to "engage with" them. That's not an incel problem, that's a volcel problem.
