Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Escort.

Kina Hikikomori

Kina Hikikomori

Hikikomori
Joined
Dec 8, 2023
Posts
5,057
The term “escort” and “incel”; it works like the paradox of “neet” and “hikikomori”. Depending on the context, you can use it incorrectly and it may seem like an “oxymoron”.


The concept of an incel is to be celibate, therefore all incels are celibate. The “escort” theory works falsely (fakecel); you lose your “celibate”, therefore, you stop being an incel, naturally. But, here comes the perspective, with which I agree, you are still a soy essence, but you are not incel, that is, you are a betabuxx, you paid an escort and indirectly supported her. Sex, in itself, is mechanical, as it is biological behavior, it is mechanical, but there is a difference, being genuine and not being genuine, in this case, it is really not genuine, but the action was performed, because for the sake of money, hence betabuxx. Soy, not incel, but beta soy. All incels are betas, but not all betas are incels (depending on your virginity loss schemes). And, amazingly, it is fallacious to use the format that, in 6 months, if you don't have sex, you are “incel” again. Because no, it's not. There is no cohesion and you are beta.
 
Last edited:
It is all about how you define "incel". I agree with this forum definition of it:

Incels.is is a community for men that struggle with or are unable to get into romantic relationships with women despite trying. We welcome men from all walks of life, and from all cultural and racial backgrounds, as long as you are an incel.

Genuineness cannot be bought.
 
The term “escort” and “incel”; it works like the paradox of “neet” and “hikikomori”. Depending on the context, you can use it incorrectly and it may seem like an “oxymoron”.


The concept of an incel is to be celibate, therefore all incels are celibate. The “escort” theory works falsely (fakecel); you lose your “celibate”, therefore, you stop being an incel, naturally. But, here comes the perspective, with which I agree, you are still a soy essence, but you are not incel, that is, you are a betabuxx, you paid an escort and indirectly supported her. Sex, in itself, is mechanical, as it is biological behavior, it is mechanical, but there is a difference, being genuine and not being genuine, in this case, it is really not genuine, but the action was performed, because for the sake of money, hence betabuxx. Soy, not incel, but beta soy. All incels are betas, but not all betas are incels (depending on your virginity loss schemes). And, amazingly, it is fallacious to use the format that, in 6 months, if you don't have sex, you are “incel” again. Because no, it's not. There is no cohesion and you are beta.
If you follow your logic to its conclusion then anyone who hasn't hired a hooker isn't an incel either they are volcels; if fucking hookers leads to ascension and losing your incel status then refusing to do so when it is a freely and easily accessible method of ascension leads to volceldom, it is no longer involuntary celibacy, it is voluntary celibacy.
 
Incels aren't betas, we are omega males
 
It is all about how you define "incel".
There is no you defining it, the concept is already defined in its etymology. Simple.

And in this case, I agree, incels are a group of men who are incapable of having sex and are therefore incels. The concept is already defined, “involuntary celibate”. And I also agree that we are not necessarily of standardized ethnicities, as it covers all men with the essential condition, and the dimorphism is individual for each one, even in white races there are incels (ugly, dysgenic), as well as not, equally for everyone.
 
Learn english first you jap before making gray definations
 
Yeah once you loose it you are no longer an incel since you’ve committed the natural act of inter course but if said social construct like money didn’t exist that guy would still be incel (this is in theory and I’m aware hypothetical scenarios don’t exist)

I wonder if you can be considered both incel and volcel at the same time
 
If you follow your logic to its conclusion then anyone who hasn't hired a hooker isn't an incel either they are volcels; if fucking hookers leads to ascension and losing your incel status then refusing to do so when it is a freely and easily accessible method of ascension leads to volceldom, it is no longer involuntary celibacy, it is voluntary celibacy.
 
If you follow your logic to its conclusion then anyone who hasn't hired a hooker isn't an incel either they are volcels; if fucking hookers leads to ascension and losing your incel status then refusing to do so when it is a freely and easily accessible method of ascension leads to volceldom, it is no longer involuntary celibacy, it is voluntary celibacy.

I agree, because that's actually how it is. The reality is that there is an individual perspective on this, whether he wants this non-genuine love or not. But, it is only considered based on the action taken, simply put, you are not guilty of something you had no choice in. And in this case he has a choice.
 
Yeah once you loose it you are no longer an incel since you’ve committed the natural act of inter course but if said social construct like money didn’t exist that guy would still be incel (this is in theory and I’m aware hypothetical scenarios don’t exist)

I wonder if you can be considered both incel and volcel at the same time
Joined: Aug 29, 2024
 
Learn english first you jap before making gray definations

I believe you understand my English well, unless you are illiterate, then yes. And the logic I follow is, this is what being is, perhaps it is you who needs to analyze the etymology of what is defined as such, logically, this follows a continuous line. Betabuxx, he supports the foid, whether indirect or direct, and in return he earns his crumbs, obviously. We are willing incels seeing the prospect of choosing to lose our virginity. However, there is also the center of the action performed, to be considered, there must be an action performed. I believe you should try to understand and then stop using your atypical ad hominem fallacies. Thanks.


Honestly, I only see robots, I think and study, then we see and understand together, ok?
 
I believe you understand my English well, unless you are illiterate, then yes. And the logic I follow is, this is what being is, perhaps it is you who needs to analyze the etymology of what is defined as such, logically, this follows a continuous line. Betabuxx, he supports the foid, whether indirect or direct, and in return he earns his crumbs, obviously. We are willing incels seeing the prospect of choosing to lose our virginity. However, there is also the center of the action performed, to be considered, there must be an action performed. I believe you should try to understand and then stop using your atypical ad hominem fallacies. Thanks.


Honestly, I only see robots, I think and study, then we see and understand together, ok?
and any incel that pays tax is a betabuxx

your logic also means that every incel that doesnt pay an escort is a volcel

you also make it seem that escortcels have superior quality of life to non escortcels
 
tbh i promise that decent amount of forum got mad at him due to that one thread that incels aren't special like we think we are :lul:

Yes, it must have been, because there is nothing better for a truecel to do than hunt for problems with a purpose, I say that being equally so. And no, no one is special, you are not special.

Only robots, and those are the ones standardized in contemporary positivist philosophy. Wow, I’m always trying to be right, but in a way that isn’t arid on anyone’s part.
 
If you follow your logic to its conclusion then anyone who hasn't hired a hooker isn't an incel either they are volcels; if fucking hookers leads to ascension and losing your incel status then refusing to do so when it is a freely and easily accessible method of ascension leads to volceldom, it is no longer involuntary celibacy, it is voluntary celibacy.
this. Op is just seething that he’s too high inhib to hire an escort.
 
tbh i promise that decent amount of forum got mad at him due to that one thread that incels aren't special like we think we are :lul:
I don’t think anyone remembers that other than me since i argued with him for like half an hour + he only made that thread because people called him a simp in a thread before that and he got mad :feelskek:
 
and any incel that pays tax is a betabuxx

First, the local concept of betabuxx is one that supports women directly and indirectly. Just. The tax you pay is what you consume, just your electricity, your water, unless you are a NEET hikikomori, then you don't even do that. Your premise is probably that you are supporting single mothers with your measly taxes (if you actually work) that you consume yourself. This is just something ideological that emerged in redpill itself, the “sustenance”: meanwhile, you only have a slipper and a bicycle, in real cases. And if this case really supports it, through its assumptions (which is actually its unique consumption, and not necessarily a source of state income for organizations)... THEN EVERYONE WHO PAYS IS BETABUXX, don't you like it? deal with it.
 
Yes, it must have been, because there is nothing better for a truecel to do than hunt for problems with a purpose, I say that being equally so. And no, no one is special, you are not special.

Only robots, and those are the ones standardized in contemporary positivist philosophy. Wow, I’m always trying to be right, but in a way that isn’t arid on anyone’s part.
yeah we are just animals trying to survive
 
this. Op is just seething that he’s too high inhib to hire an escort.
In fact, I've never hired anyone and I don't want to, I'm a hikikomori who doesn't even leave the house. And my post is not weighing in on the side that your bias is stating, and if I remember correctly, it was you, in a comment on your profile, that you made, you said, "I'm thinking of going with this escort, judge her by me."

But, well, whatever, I'm not here to see robots like you, and I consider the incline person's comment, as it is the appropriate logic, the difference is that he thinks, you palpitates.
 
First, the local concept of betabuxx is one that supports women directly and indirectly. Just. The tax you pay is what you consume, just your electricity, your water, unless you are a NEET hikikomori, then you don't even do that. Your premise is probably that you are supporting single mothers with your measly taxes (if you actually work) that you consume yourself. This is just something ideological that emerged in redpill itself, the “sustenance”: meanwhile, you only have a slipper and a bicycle, in real cases. And if this case really supports it, through its assumptions (which is actually its unique consumption, and not necessarily a source of state income for organizations)... THEN EVERYONE WHO PAYS IS BETABUXX, don't you like it? deal with it.
yeah yeah who cares
 
Thanks for the answer, robot.
this is your retarded hikikobranrot logic

> paying a foid with money directly for a service = bad
> paying a foid indirectly and getting nothing = slightly less bad
 
> paying a foid with money directly for a service = bad
> paying a foid indirectly and getting nothing = slightly less bad
In principle, that's not the case, the scenarios were distorted by their lack of coherence, that's simply it, my logic doesn't match your tendency. Just look at the epistemology of what follows.

I'm not saying that paying for an escort is “bad”, ok, I'm looking at the definition of that well said. It's not about me thinking, I don't think anything, especially this stereotypical view of “bad and less bad”, this comes from you as a projection onto me. What I'm saying is betabuxx and incel beta. Differentials.

You are making your reductionism about me.
 
In principle, that's not the case, the scenarios were distorted by their lack of coherence, that's simply it, my logic doesn't match your tendency. Just look at the epistemology of what follows.

I'm not saying that paying for an escort is “bad”, ok, I'm looking at the definition of that well said. It's not about me thinking, I don't think anything, especially this stereotypical view of “bad and less bad”, this comes from you as a projection onto me. What I'm saying is betabuxx and incel beta. Differentials.

You are making your reductionism about me.
cool whatever

this thread is a word salad nothing burger
 
ok vegan soy cum slurper


I'm not looking for fagot meat, but genuine female meat, and at no point, I repeat, do I say that it's bad if it's not genuine, it depends on who thinks..... you're illiterate. Bye, and go fuck yourself with great pride.
 
I'm not looking for fagot meat, but genuine female meat, and at no point, I repeat, do I say that it's bad if it's not genuine, it depends on who thinks..... you're illiterate. Bye, and go fuck yourself with great pride.
if only you didnt speak broken english like a fag
 
if only you didnt speak broken english like a fag

If you weren't illiterate, without even having higher education. And my English is being supported every day, and some “errors”, as you define these “errors”, which do not exist, as I am being cohesive all the time with the line, are just your projections, I repeat, illiterate with an excuse liar.
 
If you weren't illiterate, without even having higher education. And my English is being supported every day, and some “errors”, as you define these “errors”, which do not exist, as I am being cohesive all the time with the line, are just your projections, I repeat, illiterate with an excuse liar.
> calls me a faggot for no reason
> gets called a fag in return
> "youre illiterate"
 
There is no you defining it, the concept is already defined in its etymology. Simple.

And in this case, I agree, incels are a group of men who are incapable of having sex and are therefore incels. The concept is already defined, “involuntary celibate”. And I also agree that we are not necessarily of standardized ethnicities, as it covers all men with the essential condition, and the dimorphism is individual for each one, even in white races there are incels (ugly, dysgenic), as well as not, equally for everyone.
You are right, things are as they are, however, in the debate, there are people who consider "escortcels" as fakecels, making this definition invalid therefore.
 

Similar threads

E
Replies
2
Views
138
Esoteric7
E
sweet.trip
Replies
15
Views
439
rcnfive
R
Kina Hikikomori
Replies
12
Views
496
Kina Hikikomori
Kina Hikikomori
Kina Hikikomori
Replies
13
Views
212
Labyrinth
Labyrinth
D
Replies
7
Views
298
stalkerKiller
stalkerKiller

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top