Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill “Equality” is a fool’s dream, it can never be attained in a world of natural hierarchies

IncelKing

IncelKing

Chaos is a laddER
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 7, 2019
Posts
9,838
Some people are more intelligent than others, even if you gave everyone equal access to education, it would lead to the smarter individuals making it out on top in the race to find wealth and success

Some people are stronger than others, even if everyone was given an equal amount of training in martial arts (and they even had equal intelligence), the strongest would always win in a fight

Some people are more physically attractive than others, and they will find it much easier to get greater quantity/quality partners than people who are average looking or unattractive.

Etc.

it doesn’t matter whether you give everyone equal rights and equal opportunities, there will never be an equal outcome for everyone when it comes down to experiencing pleasure, enjoyment, success due to natural hierarchies which exist when it comes to looks, intelligence, physical strength and every other human attribute.

Equality of opportunity isn’t what’s important, what’s actually important is EQUALITY OF OUTCOME.

In Scandinavian countries, men make up more than 90% of the workers in the engineering sector and women make up more than 90% of the nursing sector, men and women naturally gravitated towards different occupations even after being given equal opportunity as each other to enter whatever field they wanted.

People think simply creating equal opportunity for everyone will lead to a more equal society, In fact it has been shown that the more you try to make society an equal place for everyone, the more Inequality arises, because inequality exists in nature itself whereas equality is a social construct. And at the end of the day, nature will prevail no matter how much human beings try to fight against it.

If you think about it deeply enough,
the female fight for “equality” is ironically the reason why the world became a place of even greater Inequality (for men).

In the past, women couldn’t work or own property, women themselves were seen as property lol, and it was men who were the selectors because men had all of the material resources in their possession and therefore it’s men who held all the power.

By making women dependant on a man’s resources as a result of restricting them from entering the workforce, men held leverage over women, so even ugly guys with an average job were seen as a catch by women simply for the fact that he could fulfill his ability as a provider.

The feminist fight for “equal rights” led to women being allowed to work and own property, this made them no longer dependant on a man’s resources for survival as was the case in the past, resulting in them selecting men mostly based on looks and only considering men for their money if the man is a high-earner (at least top 20%), so a significant portion of the male population will live their life getting little to no sex from women due to the societal changes implemented by feminism, even though in patriarchal societies pretty much every man with a stable job was able to score pussy.

Feminists claim they just want a world of equality and they actually succeeded in getting equal rights for women, but In doing so they ironically increased in-equality amongst men because Men had equal access to sex in the past, now some men have access to multiple women while other men have nothing.

if you try to make people equal in one aspect, then you will just be creating In-equality in other aspect. True equality can never be achieved in a world of natural differences
 
Last edited:
natural hierarchies is incel getting his face smashed in by chad. I'll push for any artificial equality that prevents that.
 
High iq thread
 
1664464927468

teehee that was totally an accident guys. women love equality really.
 
If you think about it deeply enough,
the female fight for “equality” is ironically the reason why the world became a place of even greater Inequality (for men).
Based, especially this.

Natural hierarchies are mostly a neutral thing that will always exist, especially in economical scenarios. There will always be rich and poor people. Problem arises when the poor cannot achieve basic human needs. Liberals, leftists and women are against this. They want to redistribute wealth (which will end up creating more inequality, but this is at least an intention to end inequality), but they are supportive of the hierarchies that arise in dating because they massively benefit women, and only women. So they are against economical inequalities but support dating inequalities.

This is especially bad because those who are against incels are supportive of a group of people (us) not achieving basic human needs, according to the Maslow's pyramid. We are living in society that willingly goes against its reason to be created. Sadly, feminism destroyed the system we had to avoid this kind of inequality.
 
Based, especially this.

Natural hierarchies are mostly a neutral thing that will always exist, especially in economical scenarios. There will always be rich and poor people. Problem arises when the poor cannot achieve basic human needs. Liberals, leftists and women are against this. They want to redistribute wealth (which will end up creating more inequality, but this is at least an intention to end inequality), but they are supportive of the hierarchies that arise in dating because they massively benefit women, and only women. So they are against economical inequalities but support dating inequalities.

This is especially bad because those who are against incels are supportive of a group of people (us) not achieving basic human needs, according to the Maslow's pyramid. We are living in society that willingly goes against its reason to be created. Sadly, feminism destroyed the system we had to avoid this kind of inequality.
7D08DA0C 6D59 4EAE 9CDF 0781B7E31E8D
 
Even if you collapsed civilization and made everyone poor, eventually the people who are genetically smart, hard-working, and future oriented will rise to the upper-echelons once again. I'm guessing this is partly the reason why elites only marry other elites, they don't want peasant genes diluting the pool.
 
the female fight for “equality” is ironically the reason why the world became a place of even greater Inequality (for men).

In the past, women couldn’t work or own property, women themselves were seen as property lol, and it was men who were the selectors because men had all of the material resources in their possession and therefore it’s men who held all the power.

By making women dependant on a man’s resources as a result of restricting them from entering the workforce, men held leverage over women, so even ugly guys with an average job were seen as a catch by women simply for the fact that he could fulfill his ability as a provider.

The feminist fight for “equal rights” led to women being allowed to work and own property, this made them no longer dependant on a man’s resources for survival as was the case in the past, resulting in them selecting men mostly based on looks and only considering men for their money if the man is a high-earner (at least top 20%), so a significant portion of the male population will live their life getting little to no sex from women due to the societal changes implemented by feminism, even though in patriarchal societies pretty much every man with a stable job was able to score pussy.
I talk about this in like all my threads. It's the Houellebecq pill.

I don't really think it was that bad in times past. Foids have a natural advantage over men as owners of the means of reproduction, but this was cancelled out because they were economically dependent on men. So it was more of like a state of equilibrium. I don't believe in feminist interpretations of history. They always cry about how they didn't have rights, but the fact is nobody had rights. Like of course they weren't getting educated and getting hired, most people were retards on farms anyway. Also foids are weak as shit so of course they werent gonna be self sufficient.

Technology is the greatest driver of social change. It was ultimately technology that changed the economy and culture to make it possible for foids to get jobs. But foids are still the owners of the means of reproduction, so the balance is destroyed and you get the inequality we have now. However I think ultimately technology will even things out. We are just in the "lag time" waiting for the next breakthrough. That breakthrough is reproductive technology. When we can create a more perfect reproduction, an asexual reproduction, human sexuality will become meaningless. It will eliminate the domain of struggle of sex
 
Exactly, but having a healthy romantic and sexual life is more necessary than being a CEO.

Exactly, they complain about not having the wealth of the elites who make up the top 1% of society, we complain about missing out on something that 80% of the population gets to experience

Also it is part of human nature to seek enough resources for survival, but once someone has sufficient wealth to ensure they can survive and live comfortably, chasing extreme levels of wealth is un-natural whereas seeking sex/reproduction is a fundamental part of human nature

our wants are realistic, valid and logical unlike theirs
 
Last edited:
Exactly, they complain about not having the wealth of the elites who make up the top 1% of society, we complain about missing out on something that 80% of the population gets to experience

Also it is part of human nature to seek enough resources for survival, but once someone has sufficient wealth to ensure they can survive and live comfortably, chasing extreme levels of wealth is un-natural whereas seeking sex/reproduction is a fundamental part of human nature

our wants are realistic, valid and logical unlike theirs
Based. This post and comments inspired me to do a post about where we all stand of Maslow's pyramid
 
Based. This post and comments inspired me to do a post about where we all stand of Maslow's pyramid

Maslows pyramid is just a normie construct by mainstream Jew psychologists, I prefer to just focus on understanding human nature and the way the world works in accordance to the blackpill
 
Yo, iz fax doe
 
Maslows pyramid is just a normie construct by mainstream Jew psychologists, I prefer to just focus on understanding human nature and the way the world works in accordance to the blackpill
I think this is good. It is a normie construct that shows how incels are victims of society and living subpar lives.
 
Yes; I notice this biological construct in the halo and horn effects, where foids will never really be able to treat a truecel and a Chad the same. :feelsclown:
 
Yes; I notice this biological construct in the halo and horn effects, where foids will never really be able to treat a truecel and a Chad the same. :feelsclown:

The blatant inequality is obvious to Anyone with a modicum of intelligence/self-awareness, it takes a very low iq and extreme lack of self-awareness to believe in things like justice, fairness and equality in the world we live in
 
I talk about this in like all my threads. It's the Houellebecq pill.

I don't really think it was that bad in times past. Foids have a natural advantage over men as owners of the means of reproduction, but this was cancelled out because they were economically dependent on men. So it was more of like a state of equilibrium. I don't believe in feminist interpretations of history. They always cry about how they didn't have rights, but the fact is nobody had rights. Like of course they weren't getting educated and getting hired, most people were retards on farms anyway. Also foids are weak as shit so of course they werent gonna be self sufficient.

Technology is the greatest driver of social change. It was ultimately technology that changed the economy and culture to make it possible for foids to get jobs. But foids are still the owners of the means of reproduction, so the balance is destroyed and you get the inequality we have now. However I think ultimately technology will even things out. We are just in the "lag time" waiting for the next breakthrough. That breakthrough is reproductive technology. When we can create a more perfect reproduction, an asexual reproduction, human sexuality will become meaningless. It will eliminate the domain of struggle of sex
This. The playing field will be more level when sex bots and artificial wombs arrive and we are not dependent on foids for sexual pleasure or reproduction.
The blatant inequality is obvious to Anyone with a modicum of intelligence/self-awareness, it takes a very low iq and extreme lack of self-awareness to believe in things like justice, fairness and equality in the world we live in
The thing about equality is that most people that believe in that craps dont believe in actual equality. They believe in selective equality when it benefits them(see socialism, femisim). Or they believe in equality as a virtue signal(black lies matter). Same thing with the sexual marketplace. Foids dont believe in equality in the sexual market because right now they have the advantage.
 
Some people are more intelligent than others, even if you gave everyone equal access to education, it would lead to the smarter individuals making it out on top in the race to find wealth and success

Some people are stronger than others, even if everyone was given an equal amount of training in martial arts (and they even had equal intelligence), the strongest would always win in a fight

Some people are more physically attractive than others, and they will find it much easier to get greater quantity/quality partners than people who are average looking or unattractive.

Etc.

it doesn’t matter whether you give everyone equal rights and equal opportunities, there will never be an equal outcome for everyone when it comes down to experiencing pleasure, enjoyment, success due to natural hierarchies which exist when it comes to looks, intelligence, physical strength and every other human attribute.

Equality of opportunity isn’t what’s important, what’s actually important is EQUALITY OF OUTCOME.

In Scandinavian countries, men make up more than 90% of the workers in the engineering sector and women make up more than 90% of the nursing sector, men and women naturally gravitated towards different occupations even after being given equal opportunity as each other to enter whatever field they wanted.

People think simply creating equal opportunity for everyone will lead to a more equal society, In fact it has been shown that the more you try to make society an equal place for everyone, the more Inequality arises, because inequality exists in nature itself whereas equality is a social construct. And at the end of the day, nature will prevail no matter how much human beings try to fight against it.

If you think about it deeply enough,
the female fight for “equality” is ironically the reason why the world became a place of even greater Inequality (for men).

In the past, women couldn’t work or own property, women themselves were seen as property lol, and it was men who were the selectors because men had all of the material resources in their possession and therefore it’s men who held all the power.

By making women dependant on a man’s resources as a result of restricting them from entering the workforce, men held leverage over women, so even ugly guys with an average job were seen as a catch by women simply for the fact that he could fulfill his ability as a provider.

The feminist fight for “equal rights” led to women being allowed to work and own property, this made them no longer dependant on a man’s resources for survival as was the case in the past, resulting in them selecting men mostly based on looks and only considering men for their money if the man is a high-earner (at least top 20%), so a significant portion of the male population will live their life getting little to no sex from women due to the societal changes implemented by feminism, even though in patriarchal societies pretty much every man with a stable job was able to score pussy.

Feminists claim they just want a world of equality and they actually succeeded in getting equal rights for women, but In doing so they ironically increased in-equality amongst men because Men had equal access to sex in the past, now some men have access to multiple women while other men have nothing.

if you try to make people equal in one aspect, then you will just be creating In-equality in other aspect. True equality can never be achieved in a world of natural differences
good post, posted before but dersves tone revisited
what a fucking word salad created by schizo faggots take your anti psychotics deranged faggot!!!!!!!!! (in video game)
:lul::lul::lul:
accurate as fuck. if leftists can bitch about unequal economy, so should we have right to bitch about sexual inequality
Even if you collapsed civilization and made everyone poor, eventually the people who are genetically smart, hard-working, and future oriented will rise to the upper-echelons once again. I'm guessing this is partly the reason why elites only marry other elites, they don't want peasant genes diluting the pool.
yup in Italy, same fucking bloodlines richfags 500 years ago, still rich rn. they found that in some study. Same shit in China in spite of maoist revolution, lots of the pre revolution richfags, rich again
 
good post, posted before but dersves tone revisited

Lol what do you mean “posted before”. This is my first time making this thread and as far as I’m concerned I haven’t seen a thread on the same topic ever being written on the forum before let alone being written with the same level of depth that I wrote mine
 
I like this thread a lot. Even in school, a group of us will study the same material, the exact same time, all variables are equal yet there will be those that outperform others constantly. Equality is just a dream.
 
Bump for @BlkPillPres
 
Thank you for a high IQ post.

Limiting somebodies opportunities is unnatural and can bring to large instability in the society. A good example is the Jews. They were limited in rights, and in over to get more equality they destroyed whole regimes, like the Tzarist Russia.
Limiting somebodies rights based solely on sex, race, religion will bring a civil war.
Yes, incels are a result of females freedoms, but it's collateral damage that can be tolerated by the society, for today. Invention of excellent sex androids will resolve this issue.
 
Basically what people want is equity, any disadvantage person will receive additional help for their short comings be it lack of legs or lack of brains or maybe racial disadvantages.

The problem is no one applies this consistently and only want selective equity, basically most don’t truly want to get rid of said hierarchies they just want to be on top. They just mad they are not.
Invention of excellent sex androids will resolve this issue.
Also don’t forget artificial wombs. We probably were born too early until we start to get the really interesting technology, by time it’s here we will be to old to care on our way out or dead.
 
Last edited:
there will never be true equality, but we can make it more equal, and therefore, less losers. there will always be losers, but we can reduce amount of them
 
High IQ, good read.
 
in normie world this is equal to this and both are muh queens
1664896662512
1664896676266
 
I like this thread a lot. Even in school, a group of us will study the same material, the exact same time, all variables are equal yet there will be those that outperform others constantly. Equality is just a dream.
always has been in PATHS the creator was unfair it made sense to make the universe in HIS image which is also unfair, also nature is a BIG fat landwhale that eats angel cakes....which is a reason why things are the way they are
 
Exactly "equality" is a work of fiction.
 
Re: I think I'm done with feminism.
AnonyAnonymous
Png

Join Date: 2013-06-23
Post Count: 6332
#148292631Monday, October 20, 2014 4:19 AM CDT
Well, regardless of the statements of those particular people, "Complete Equality" is conceptually and biologically impossible. Kindness nor respect for others should be limited strictly to a particular gender.
Re: ITT: Feminism
AnonyAnonymous
Png

Join Date: 2013-06-23
Post Count: 6332
#149298487Thursday, November 06, 2014 6:20 PM CST
The influence of most types of "Feminism" have a catastrophically destructive influence on the humane communication between people of the opposite gender. "True Equality" is conceptually and biologically impossible between both genders and empathy is something that should be exchanged between all humans.
Re: "gender equality"
AnonyAnonymous
Png

Join Date: 2013-06-23
Post Count: 6332
#149346159Friday, November 07, 2014 5:09 PM CST
Equality via abstraction is certainly possible to a limited extent. "Complete Equality" is certainly impossible though.
Re: i would like to clarify some things
AnonyAnonymous
Png

Join Date: 2013-06-23
Post Count: 6332
#152585126Saturday, December 27, 2014 6:27 PM CST
Balance can be achieved without feminism. Complete "Equality" in every aspect cannot be acquired.
Re: I like how (militant) feminists always imply that only males
AnonyAnonymous
Png

Join Date: 2013-06-23
Post Count: 6332
#158466899Sunday, March 22, 2015 7:55 PM CDT
"True" equality in every aspect is impossible to achieve. It's much more crucial to recognize general characteristics of a human that's not gender-specific rather than attempting to mimic qualities of the opposite gender in an attempt to gain respect among a group of individuals.

...

Re: ask a democratic socialist anything
Moronism
Png

Join Date: 2010-02-08
Post Count: 451
#181517381Monday, January 11, 2016 5:02 PM CST
"why do you support a government type in which rich people become richer and poor people become poorer" Equality can only arrive through inequality. A rather paradoxical statement, yes? Well, the instinctual desire to appease need causes socialistic ideologies to experience significant flaws.
 
Yeah.

Every group in society has certain demands, e.g. women, nonwhites, lgbt, whites, ..., etc. Every group just wants whats the best for their own demographic, so they could selfishly have what's best for themselves (that's how narrow it goes).
 

Similar threads

Nordicel94
Replies
11
Views
192
Kinkcel1
Kinkcel1
T
Replies
8
Views
258
NocturnalCel
NocturnalCel
AutistSupremacist
Replies
9
Views
133
Todd Thundercock
Todd Thundercock
Gendocel
Replies
37
Views
414
Gendocel
Gendocel
Balding Subhuman
Replies
5
Views
134
GeneticDysfunction
GeneticDysfunction

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top