They have to pick one or the other, they can't have it both ways when it's convenient for them. This is like if men had anarchocapitalism economically, and communism in relationships, which I think would be much more beneficial and violence would be significantly lowered.
Because they are successful in the dating scene, but not economically.
Exactly. And the fact we have socialism economically (governments intervene in the economy massively and also enforce monopolist fiat currency) and anarchocapitalism in the dating scene pretty much all around the west is the proof society is gynocentric.
Being blackpilled is the new religion. If those women in the harem know that men are blackpilled and after they get used up by chads, in their 40's when the chads don't want them anymore, they will also be used like an old cum rag by sub6 men, so that will deter the other femoids who are still in their teens from going that route.
There's almost an equal ratio of men to women so which men get first dibs? I think there should be a system of matching people, so it's as fair as possible. People with a similar looks score/personality get put together, but there could be temporary reparations for incels where they get women above their league (but no breeding, only the best genes should get passed on)
They shouldn't choose because they can't even get raped. With a chad he can have the most violent degrading sex with her, but if a slightly unattractive man grabs her ass, then she's a "sexual assault victim." They also talk about wanting to be murdered by hot men, so they have no sense in being smart enough to choose their long term partners on their own.
You didn't need to prove it to me. I've seen the ridiculous bullshit IRL.
We can let those cucks share their degenerate "free love" together with their 40 year old sluts if they want, but leave the real men and their prime femoids out of it.
Thats unessesary.
This.
