Starting an argument over the use of a word is most certainly over reacting. If any particular words were unacceptable here, they would be listed in the site rules. You are trying to control my speech, and therefore the points I can make - because you didn’t like my opinion. THAT is what SJWs do.
I didn't start an argument I made a suggestion, it only became an argument because you are so adamant about using that specific word, which I don't see why.
You are not so lucky anymore then, because I am calling you a creep right now.
Actually I'm still lucky because:
1. You are a man, so it doesn't matter if you call me a creep
2. It only really hurts if you get called names in person, if I get called a creep as my online persona I couldn't care less
Adult men who argue that twelve and thirteen year olds should be legally fuckable by them are creeps.
Ok, simple question, why?
The age of consent is quite arbitrary, heck the age of consent in mexico is 12, in japan its 13, in sweden its 15, in some states of america its 16 and then most everywhere else there's the golden number 18, ironically in countries where the legal age to drink is 20+, so I can ironically fuck and impregnate a female, but her drinking an alcholoic beverage.......... now that's a no no
Guys like you are just half assing this "I'm logical" thing, there's always a line where your emotions kick in and you stop thinking rationally, and you can't even validate it logically.
Really, its a simple question, why?, in fact more like why now?, because don't know if you noticed, we've already been fucking females in those age groups for thousands of years now and having children wtih them, your great great great grandmother was likely in that age group when she was sexually active with her husband. When we look at the span of human existence, this age of consent thing is relatively new.
That is why if you believed your own bullshit, you would wear that shirt out in public. But of course you know that the people outraged by it wouldn’t be interested in hearing your arguments either.
JFL oh yeah that makes perfect sense, I guess believing in something makes you immortal and immune to physical damage. You do realize how retarded this argument you are making here sounds right. You believe that women at that age group should be off limits so let me use your same BS argument, go to an islamic state and walk around with a shirt saying how much you detest that practice.
I can still die, be stabbed, get arrested, etc. What bearing does my belief in something have on those things........ exactly retard nothing. its really fitting that you make this illogical emotionally charged argument proving what I said above, certain topics make guys like you drift from being logical to being emotional and you start making flawed argument you usually wouldn't make in other topics.
I’m not going to defend why I didn’t fuck my stalker.
Ok but:
1. What would you rate her looks out of 10
2. What do you mean by "stalk", as far as I know you could have just been misinterpreting her looking for a friend as her stalking you, what did she do that was "stalkerish"
I know, I know. Everyone who doesn’t agree with you is a larping leftist fakecel cuck soyboy SJW snowflake.
No just everybody who fits certain criteria, like you are right now, you know what the greatest irony of all this is right now, you proving that you
INCORRECTLY USED THE TERM TRIGGERED. How you are acting right now in response to my arguments on age of consent
IS THE DEFINITION OF TRIGGERED (so much irony). Now ask yourself, was my response to you using the term "creep" anything like what you did here?
Good luck man. You are going to need it.
We both are going to need it, last time I checked were both incels (or is it just me), your life didn't magically get better because I would have sex with females that are "under-aged", nothings changed, you're still incel too. Again saying more shit to make me think you are larping, or is this just the influence of your emotions on your arguments, because were both in the same boat as incel losers........... riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight?.
But no, as you said I'm just calling you a larper because you disagree with me, not because of the behavioural traits you exhibit that identify you as something who considers themselves as "not like the rest of us", its completely just me not liking people who disagree with me (obvious sarcasm)
Anyways I doubt you are going to reply back because you are ironically the one triggered here, expecting my TLDR from you, bye.
