Doom: The Dark Ages System Requirements - PC gaming will soon become unaffordable
Sad times
I can run it, am good 
How many years in jail can i get for armed robbery again ?
If so many people can’t afford it because of the specs, sales will drop, and they might notice that making games easy to run might be a good idea.
At least that’s how it’s supposed to go in an ideal world.
At least that’s how it’s supposed to go in an ideal world.
Theres still all the old good games at least that dont require this power
I can run Ultra 4K. Well, technically, 5070 Ti is like 2% worse than 4080.
Asking a 8 core cpu as minimum requirement is insane. Also idk whats with these games these days shoving mandatory ray tracing its just a performance killer
lol, lmao even
they push for rtx because retarded soydevs dont know how to do basic lighting and put all the hard work onto your gpu
devs these days only know to put jewkraine and palestine flags in their games and write black lives matter in their bio. I wish jewniversity these days had competitive environment instead of dei hiring
already unaffordable
i am glad i dont buy this pc parts anymore and i get TOYS instead. The games are SHIT these days anyway.
i am glad i dont buy this pc parts anymore and i get TOYS instead. The games are SHIT these days anyway.
A recent 6 core CPU will be fine in most cases. But, if you're using some old Intel quad core or whatever, it's time to upgrade.
Path tracing is the future of lighting in games and will become the default. It's just a matter of time recognizing when enough people have the hardware to use it. That Indiana Jones probably jumped the gun a little early.
even if they did, companies would just import H1Bs for cheap
there are tons of passionate and competent devs but companies are refusing to hire them
I have a 14 core cpu i dont need to worry but still 8 core for something linear like doom feels insane. These games were always made so that even a potato can run them at 60fps
A 6600 is a modern potato and 2070 is at least 6 years old. I'd bet the older games didn't run 60 fps with GPUs that old.
i had 1650 for doom eternal and could get 100fps with custom settings.
Still better than the default 30FPS for the Switch port.
Speaking of which, I doubt there will be a port of Dark Ages for the Switch 2. Which I imagine would make or break a lot of people's decisions on buying the new console.
i like how normies called switch a 1650 equivalent. 1650 was way more powerful anything that jew console could do. You can emulate tears of the kingdom at 1080 with 45fps with emulation. Imagine what would a native pc port do
I am fucking sick of having to upgrade my GPU every 2 years
P
play on low settings maybe
terrible experience
Console gamer here. Can anyone give me a price estimate of the minimum requirements and the recommended? Both seem stupidly expensive.
Just play older games nobody cares about these never slop games full of faggot and tranny propaganda every 5 seconds for example the last of us 2.
Rx 6600 ryzen 5600 system can be built for 600 euros or so. And yes 5600 is more powerful than 3700x despite having 2 less cores.
I
Just look at what they've managed yo squeeze out of the PS1 and PS2.
I mean, I don't like the game, but Uncharted looks awesome and I've heard that it plays well also.
Imo the constant improvement of gaming hardware is the problem.
I remember how a developer once said that limitations drive innovation, but we don't have hardware limits anymore. Same goes for consoles.
Just look at GTA 5. It runs well on even a PS3 and XBOX 360, as well as the insanely underpowered xbox one and ps4.
And it looks great on last gen.
Then check out the PC requirements. Thanks to a lot of hardware resources available on the PC side of things, developers get lazy and usually make lazy ports.
I miss the days when devs would make beautiful games with depth run on potatoes.
Just look at what they've managed yo squeeze out of the PS1 and PS2.
I mean, I don't like the game, but Uncharted looks awesome and I've heard that it plays well also.
Imo the constant improvement of gaming hardware is the problem.
I remember how a developer once said that limitations drive innovation, but we don't have hardware limits anymore. Same goes for consoles.
Just look at GTA 5. It runs well on even a PS3 and XBOX 360, as well as the insanely underpowered xbox one and ps4.
And it looks great on last gen.
Then check out the PC requirements. Thanks to a lot of hardware resources available on the PC side of things, developers get lazy and usually make lazy ports.
This. I emulate the shit out of old consoles as well. There is SO MUCH FUN to be had. I won't even be able to finish all those games in my lifetime. What would I need the new literal slop for?
B
Honestly, the graphics aren't even that good. Looks very cartoonish and unrealistic. Why such high system requirements?
Raytracing.
B
I got a 3070 and an i9 and I can play doom eternal on max @ 4k. I just don't get to have ray tracing.
I will never be able to play this game. SMH
B
Whats your PC like?
It's a Firelord Inspiron i5 7th generation 7000 Gaming Laptop with a Nvidia GTX 1050 graphics card. It can't play new gen releases.
Coom: the blacked ages
Why do you think I've mostly been playing boomer shooters & their remasters for the past decade?
Wonder how it'll run on my PS5.
no they won’t because the overwhelming majority of their customers are on console, and the 15% of Steam users who buy current year games are also part of the 20% of the Steam goycattle buying rtx x60 cards and above
GPU prises are the issue and now how much power a game needs to run properly
Mind stating the source for that ? Steam has over a billion users, i doubt Steam players make up only 15%
why is RaYTrAcING so glorified?
Steam doesn’t have a billion a users, they have about 130 million which is the same as Nintendo and PSN
Only 15% of all Steam users' time was spent playing games released in 2024
Steam's end-of-year review of what we play and how we play makes for some interesting reading.
P
GTA 5 came out in 2012 or sumting. It's graphics looks very realistic to me. Why do these game devs want to keep improving graphics? I mean how can you make graphics better when it already have reached that realistic levels.
132 million active userd, but over a billion accounts createdSteam doesn’t have a billion a users, they have about 130 million which is the same as Nintendo and PSN
Only 15% of all Steam users' time was spent playing games released in 2024
Steam's end-of-year review of what we play and how we play makes for some interesting reading.www.pcgamer.com
Modern devs are lazy troons, foids, shitskins and faggots who get paid for diversity
GTA 5 had frame drops on ps3/xbox and the system requirment is for 1080p just lower it to 720p
Doom darkage system requirements is affordable rx 6600 is cheap just lower graphic settings if your cpu can't handle it how is this a problem again?
Lma
Lmao gaming on a laptop is a waste of money get a desktop in order to run doom dark age or games that require software level ray tracing you need to cough up 1,000 dollars or wait for discount
My pc is ready
Gpu price is not a issue just dont buy the latest gpu when the supply is low cause low supply and high demand equals high price its been happeing since the rtx 3000 launch
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
