Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Don't use peer reviewed scientific papers anymore.

hatewimen

hatewimen

Her no mean yes.
-
Joined
Jul 25, 2022
Posts
867
Universities and scientific research has been seriosly corrupted by political correctness. Literally any paper that goes against the feminist, lgbtq, Jew world order rhetoric, is literally blocked from being published. Papers literally proving anything that the mainstream political rhetoric says are literally censored even if they're properly researched. Since the incel word got mainstream the universities have been censor any research that proves us right, and instead publish papers proving our points wrong even if the research is wrong. We have to do our own research now.
 
There are few fields that are universal and mostly free of bias due to their nature. Mathematics for one, due to how math works can mostly be free of opinion. Math is a just a set of logical rules used for measuring things. There are no opinions in such a field. Something either works or you fucked up.

Other fields definitely are full of shady shit. I've spoke to plenty of researchers. I've been asked to review papers and journals before. Many of them admit that in some fields there's a lot of shit. There's a lot of evidence showing that some research that sets out to find discrimination against women, often ends up finding that men are discriminated against or at the disadvantage. Many of these papers get thrown out for X reason. Often times studies can be funded by certain people or bodies and if they don't see the results they like, they can just trash the entire thing. Stop funding it.

We shouldn't just ignore peer reviewed papers most of the time though. All research builds ontop of previously established findings. While it may be time consuming theres a lot you can extrapolate by properly analyzing them. All research can be critiqued, positively or negatively. Fact is there is no such thing as a perfect study. There aren't many research methods that are foolproof. All have their pros and cons. The biggest barrier being the immense amount of variables that play a part in certain things. Some things you can prove for certain, but bigger picture stuff, cause and effect, you can infer most of the time. It can be very hit and miss depending on the topic and focus of the paper.
 
There are few fields that are universal and mostly free of bias due to their nature. Mathematics for one, due to how math works can mostly be free of opinion. Math is a just a set of logical rules used for measuring things. There are no opinions in such a field. Something either works or it you fucked up.

Other fields definitely are full of shady shit. I've spoke to plenty of researchers. I've been asked to review papers and journals before. Many of them admit that in some fields there's a lot of shit. There's a lot of evidence showing that some research that sets out to find discrimination against women, often ends up finding that men are discriminated against or at the disadvantage. Many of these papers get thrown out for X reason. Often times studies can be funded by certain people or bodies and if they don't see the results they like, they can just trash the entire thing. Stop funding it.

We shouldn't just ignore peer reviewed papers most of the time though. All research builds ontop of previously established findings. While it may be time consuming theres a lot you can extrapolate by properly analyzing them. All research can be critiqued, positively or negatively. Fact is there is no such thing as a perfect study. There aren't many research methods that are foolproof. All have their pros and cons. The biggest barrier being the immense amount of variables that play a part in certain things. Some things you can prove for certain, but bigger picture stuff, cause and effect, you can infer most of the time. It can be very hit and miss depending on the topic and focus of the paper.
Science has been corrupted by political bias for decades now.
 
Science has been corrupted by political bias for decades now.
Not just papers. But reporting things. Yellow journalism has been pretty much mainstream since the early 20th century. But that's just what humans do and always have. Bend things to their will. If they can benefit by sacrificing their integrity they often will
 
Peer review is about the most unscientific thing there is. Because the peers are the guardians of the current theories. So any new ideas they just don't approve. And anyone who challenges their old theories showing big time problems with them.. it is obviously chucked in the garbage without the peers reading it, because they all 'know' they are right.

In the centuries of monumental science advances in the 1600's to the 1800's there was no peer review.

So almost all of science is stuff that outright has proven to be wrong, they just keep that hidden, or 99.9% of time the leading professors themselves don't know about it because the dis proofs have long since been buried.

Because almost all areas of science the theories are wrong that is why they have made no progress for about 100 years now. The best they can do is come up with laughable stupid ideas like relativity theory and quantum mechanics. Which they can never demonstrate in the real world or do anything with that in the real world because its complete bullshit.

So how do we get out of it. We don't. The most advanced corporations have their own internal science that they don't share with others because why would they tell their competitors.

It turns out its very valuable for the mega corporations and organizations like the US military if everybody is learning fake stupid stuff. But they have real science they are advancing.
 
Literally any paper that goes against the feminist, lgbtq, Jew world order rhetoric, is literally blocked from being published.
Depends where you look, politically unbiased research is still being done behind closed doors.
 

Similar threads

Shaktiman
Replies
15
Views
466
Therapywasawaste
Therapywasawaste
B
Replies
26
Views
1K
Kina Hikikomori
Kina Hikikomori
Zhou Chang-Xing
Replies
13
Views
695
XDFLAMEBOY
XDFLAMEBOY
Raider919
Replies
10
Views
745
Raider919
Raider919

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top