Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Venting Doesn't it frustrate you that women still refuse sex, even with birth control?

TheDarkEnigma

TheDarkEnigma

St. JackieArklövcel
★★★★★
Joined
Sep 10, 2019
Posts
17,160
Even with birth control, anti-contraceptives and safe sex, women still wouldn't fuck you even if there's not procreation if she can fuck all the guys she ever wanted.

It's not like a woman has anything to lose if she offered sex to us, nor would she get pregnant if she didn't wanted to and took precautions to prevent that. So why haven't women become less selective?

She's a slut who's fucking hundreds of different guys, but you're not in her body count.

This is one of the reasons why I grown to hate porn. Because porn makes it looks that sex and pleasure are so easy to get. Like as if they are women are willing to come to you and make your dick feel good. But it's just you jacking off to a screen. Then why am I not worthy to get the real thing?

Meanwhile, men have to pay hookers if we want a guaranteed chance of sex, whereas even a landwhale can get Chad for free with just a right swipe of a dating app.
 
because their brains are the same as 200.000 years ago

so they dont feel like getting fucked by a lot of guys because their brains developed in circumstances in which birth control didnt exist

sexual desires are dictated by evolution not by society as much as bluepillers want to believe
 
because their brains are the same as 200.000 years ago

so they dont feel like getting fucked by a lot of guys because their brains developed in circumstances in which birth control didnt exist

sexual desires are dictated by evolution not by society as much as bluepillers want to believe
And yet they say that sex for pleasure is different than sex for procreation.
 
Even with birth control, anti-contraceptives and safe sex, women still wouldn't fuck you even if there's not procreation if she can fuck all the guys she ever wanted.

It's not like a woman has anything to lose if she offered sex to us, nor would she get pregnant if she didn't wanted to and took precautions to prevent that. So why haven't women become less selective?

She's a slut who's fucking hundreds of different guys, but you're not in her body count.

This is one of the reasons why I grown to hate porn. Because porn makes it looks that sex and pleasure are so easy to get. Like as if they are women are willing to come to you and make your dick feel good. But it's just you jacking off to a screen. Then why am I not worthy to get the real thing?

Meanwhile, men have to pay hookers if we want a guaranteed chance of sex, whereas even a landwhale can get Chad for free with just a right swipe of a dating app.
Vasectomy is an option. The chances of getting someone pregnant after a vasectomy is less than 1 in 1.000. It's more effective than any female birth control.
 
And yet they say that sex for pleasure is different than sex for procreation.
tbh, they have no awareness of how evolution works

sex for pleasure is a creation of the modern world, it doesnt comply with evolution

chimpanzees dont have sex for pleasure, they fuck because they need to
 
tbh, they have no awareness of how evolution works

sex for pleasure is a creation of the modern world, it doesnt comply with evolution

chimpanzees dont have sex for pleasure, they fuck because they need to
look at bonobos tho
 
But sex is a need and thus it should be given to us as much as food is given to us.
sex is a need only in the sense that it possibilitates reproduction. can you elaborate on where else it is a need?
 
sex is a need only in the sense that it possibilitates reproduction. can you elaborate on where else it is a need?
Then why is food so easy to get nowadays, but sex is artificially scarce if they're only so much women in the world?
 
because their brains are the same as 200.000 years ago

so they dont feel like getting fucked by a lot of guys because their brains developed in circumstances in which birth control didnt exist

sexual desires are dictated by evolution not by society as much as bluepillers want to believe
 
Then why is food so easy to get nowadays, but sex is artificially scarce if they're only so much women in the world?
food is easy because mass production of it does not cost much nowadays

sex is scarce only for us, everyone else is having their share of it, and its artificially scarce because of feminism, progressivism, and cuckoldry that enabled the hypergamous nature of women

because people have sexual freedom nowadays, women in general have the possibility of being hypergamous because its them who control if men will have sex. they are the gatekeepers. the only way in which men will have the power is retrieving patriarchy and instituted monogamy

woman control who will have sex because they are scarcer biologically speaking, a man can fertilize even ten women in a day while a woman has to wait a lot of time to become pregnant again

the quantity of women in the world doesnt outlaw the biological order of things, which is: if a species is sexually free, the females of its species will always select the best males available to them; which is whats happening in the human species nowadays

moral and law didnt allowed the biological order of things to happen for millenia for 1 reason: men are more powerful than women physically speaking, if they werent then women would be hypergamous and moral wouldnt be able to stop the biological order

you can see females of other animals oftenly outpowering the males, and thus being sexual free to always select the best males
 
food is easy because mass production of it does not cost much nowadays

sex is scarce only for us, everyone else is having their share of it, and its artificially scarce because of feminism, progressivism, and cuckoldry that enabled the hypergamous nature of women

because people have sexual freedom nowadays, women in general have the possibility of being hypergamous because its them who control if men will have sex. they are the gatekeepers. the only way in which men will have the power is retrieving patriarchy and instituted monogamy

woman control who will have sex because they are scarcer biologically speaking, a man can fertilize even ten women in a day while a woman has to wait a lot of time to become pregnant again

the quantity of women in the world doesnt outlaw the biological order of things, which is: if a species is sexually free, the females of its species will always select the best males available to them; which is whats happening in the human species nowadays

moral and law didnt allowed the biological order of things to happen for millenia for 1 reason: men are more powerful than women physically speaking, if they werent then women would be hypergamous and moral wouldnt be able to stop the biological order
Which goes back to women being picky about sex when sex is 'free', even if birth control is used.
 
Which goes back to women being picky about sex when sex is 'free', even if birth control is used.
yea tbh

great discussion here boyo

:feelshmm: the blackpill is undefeated

Bluepillers: 32

the fags are watching us :feelswhere:
 
yea tbh

great discussion here boyo

:feelshmm: the blackpill is undefeated

Bluepillers: 32

the fags are watching us :feelswhere:
I know that attraction all comes down to evolution, even if we were to find them arousing to look at because we know that they are fertile/have good genes. And I know that our brains won't change no matter what society tries to tell us.

But even then. It doesn't cost women anything anymore to have sex with literally anyone if they take birth control. Sex feels good, so they should have sex with all to make everyone else feel good.
 
so they should have sex with all to make everyone else feel good.
it costs their dignity. in their eyes, having sex with subhumans is dehumanizing, because of how genetic dead-ends subhumans really are. it does not make them feel good like with chad, because it also wouldnt 200.000 years ago. feelings are based on evolution, you cant force a feeling that depends on social circumstances like the creation of birth control

unfortunately that will never happen, women might be worthless and complete cum dumpsters, but even for men reproduction is completely egotistical. its literally only the transfer of your genetic code for the sake of creating a new being. like 200.000 ago, even if they are aware they are protected by birth control, somewhere in their subconscious lies the feeling of disgust if having sex with you. thats the sad nature of biology. we will never be accepted because we've never should be even alive in the first place. in a sexually free society, subhumans are doomed and at hand of nature and because of that, we will all perish. simply putting it, its over
 
it costs their dignity. in their eyes, having sex with subhumans is dehumanizing, because of how genetic dead-ends subhumans really are. it does not make them feel good like with chad, because it also wouldnt 200.000 years ago. feelings are based on evolution, you cant force a feeling that depends on social circumstances like the creation of birth control

unfortunately that will never happen, women might be worthless and complete cum dumpsters, but even for men reproduction is completely egotistical. its literally only the transfer of your genetic code for the sake of creating a new being. like 200.000 ago, even if they are aware they are protected by birth control, somewhere in their subconscious lies the feeling of disgust if having sex with you. thats the sad nature of biology. we will never be accepted because we've never should be even alive in the first place. in a sexually free society, subhumans are doomed and at hand of nature and because of that, we will all perish. simply putting it, its over
Yet landwhales, middle-aged roasties, autistic foids, even mentally psycho women who are below average and unfit to have children still get free sex, and if they want they even get pregnant and end up single mothers.
 
Women take birth control so they can get railed by Chad and not have to deal with kids.
It's the same as it ever was, birth control just removes the "what if I get pregnant" factor from the equation.
 
Women take birth control so they can get railed by Chad and not have to deal with kids.
It's the same as it ever was, birth control just removes the "what if I get pregnant" factor from the equation.
Foids still won't care if they get pregnant by Chad. That's what they want. If anything, she has more to gain if she does.

She only regrets having sex and aborts her pregnancy if they guy who knocked her up was a normie.
 
Last edited:
It frustrates me that women even have rights
 
When I make a comment talking about a super effective birth control for males and have to wait for mod approval...
 
‘She's a slut who's fucking hundreds of different guys, but you're not in her body count.’

This is what pisses me off about sluts, they casually pleasure other men but not me.
 
‘She's a slut who's fucking hundreds of different guys, but you're not in her body count.’

This is what pisses me off about sluts, they casually pleasure other men but not me.
Yoshis me
 
Vasectomy is an option. The chances of getting someone pregnant after a vasectomy is less than 1 in 1.000. It's more effective than any female birth control.
Then tell me why should a woman get her tubes tied before she's given the chance without kids?

Maybe a post-menopausal MILF granny would be less picky if her infertility and lack of hormonal cycles means she doesn't care who creams in her kahoot now that it's inert.
 
Then tell me why should a woman get her tubes tied before she's given the chance without kids?

Maybe a post-menopausal MILF granny would be less picky if her infertility and lack of hormonal cycles means she doesn't care who creams in her kahoot now that it's inert.
Because women have too many options so they will always choose. They are still living in the stone age. The female is always the prize in the animal kingdom. Unfortunately it traversed to humans.
 
Because women have too many options so they will always choose. They are still living in the stone age. The female is always the prize in the animal kingdom. Unfortunately it traversed to humans.
Let's say men can choose whatever foid he wants too.

Women will always have guys who want to have sex with. Just fuck every single guy no matter what if there's no chance of her getting pregnant.
 
rap(music)e is the answer
 
That’s why you pay for sex :feelsthink:
 
Women take birth control so they can get railed by Chad and not have to deal with kids.
It's the same as it ever was, birth control just removes the "what if I get pregnant" factor from the equation.
 
Funny thing about BC.

Before BC foids still fucked chads. Sure there were actual consequences like divorce meaning she's FINISHED, but there's no way they would care about getting pregnant. They'd rather have chad's kids anyway and if he knocked her up, she knows the beta pays for it without knowing the difference. No doubt there are entire families of just chad kids even if dad ain't a chad.

I think the REAL reason foids are all on BC is because they don't want the beta baby. If you're fucking a beta bf and a chad at the same time, you might accidentally get pregnant with his. Can't have that. So they use BC for the beta's seed, but if they want chad's baby they will get off the pill.
 
Never thought about it
 
Which is why birth control was the biggest scam foids ever obtained from soyciety.
It was supposedly allowing them to fuck more men so less sexual misery in the general population, and that's how those foids sold this dream to soycieties.
But in fact they just fuck more Chads, and only Chads.

If you add the development of internet social networks to birth control, you obtain an even greater sexual misery in society than before anything was changed.

And a worldwide demographic decrease too.
 
women still wouldn't fuck you
1621805918352
 
That’s why you pay for sex :feelsthink:
But that the thing. The majority men are not Chad so for most men including normies, the best guarantee they have at getting laid are paid escorts.

However, most women on the other hand can easily get laid by Chad/Chadlite or at least a high-tier normie for free and without any effort or "self-improvement", even if she's below average in looks and out of shape.

Then why should I pay sex with a woman, when an autistic landwhale can freely explore her sexuality?
 
look at bonobos tho
bonobos have sex for like 30 seconds. Human sexuality is much more complex. I think there are ways to hack this complexity, for example if you are a party organizer, you're pretty much guaranteed to have sex.
 
Even with birth control, anti-contraceptives and safe sex, women still wouldn't fuck you even if there's not procreation if she can fuck all the guys she ever wanted.
This is not how attraction works. Even if there's no procreation, you wouldn't like some gay guy fill your asshole, would you?
 
This is not how attraction works. Even if there's no procreation, you wouldn't like some gay guy fill your asshole, would you?
No, but I'm not gay and I don't want to catch AIDS.

I'm talking about every man for every woman.
 
No, but I'm not gay and I don't want to catch AIDS.

I'm talking about every man for every woman.
I think you're idealizing bonobos sexuality, as they have homosexual sex all the time.
 

Similar threads

Nordicel94
Replies
17
Views
468
Lurkercel_678
Lurkercel_678
T
Replies
15
Views
277
Texas.Kansas92
T
TheJester
Replies
16
Views
310
Nordicel94
Nordicel94
La Grande Infamie
Replies
30
Views
412
Todd The Harpooner
Todd The Harpooner

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top