PotatoTomato
Overlord
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2018
- Posts
- 6,245
Think about it.
If we consider year 16 as the first year of baby-making and year 35 as the final one, you are essentially getting access to 20 years of her reproductive life. As a man, this is excellent. Imagine the amount of children you could have together.
Imagine instead, however, marrying a woman in her thirties. As a guy, there is no worse fate. You have a very limited window of opportunity to have kids, and you must keep in mind that as she ages the quantity and quality of her eggs decreases rapidly - good luck trying to get a woman in her 40s pregnant; and if you do and she doesn't miscarriage, please understand that there is a much higher chance of the child developing problems such as autism.
That is just from a "reproductive life" perspective though. There are still other things to take into account. Like the fact that a girl in her late teens and early twenties is going through college and getting dicked constantly by Chads (high school was already bad enough, but college is a completely different ballpark) as well as being bombarded by insane feminist propaganda telling her not to have kids. Due to a lifestyle of partying with chad cum and drugs and alcohol, they will hit the wall by 25. And of course, fall for the "stronk independent wahman" meme which makes them focus on slaving away for Mr. Shekelstein instead of having children.
I ask you, men of the world: does it make sense to marry a girl older than 16?
If we consider year 16 as the first year of baby-making and year 35 as the final one, you are essentially getting access to 20 years of her reproductive life. As a man, this is excellent. Imagine the amount of children you could have together.
Imagine instead, however, marrying a woman in her thirties. As a guy, there is no worse fate. You have a very limited window of opportunity to have kids, and you must keep in mind that as she ages the quantity and quality of her eggs decreases rapidly - good luck trying to get a woman in her 40s pregnant; and if you do and she doesn't miscarriage, please understand that there is a much higher chance of the child developing problems such as autism.
That is just from a "reproductive life" perspective though. There are still other things to take into account. Like the fact that a girl in her late teens and early twenties is going through college and getting dicked constantly by Chads (high school was already bad enough, but college is a completely different ballpark) as well as being bombarded by insane feminist propaganda telling her not to have kids. Due to a lifestyle of partying with chad cum and drugs and alcohol, they will hit the wall by 25. And of course, fall for the "stronk independent wahman" meme which makes them focus on slaving away for Mr. Shekelstein instead of having children.
I ask you, men of the world: does it make sense to marry a girl older than 16?