T
throwawayseeker
Banned
-
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2018
- Posts
- 74
No doubt denying looks theory is legit retarded, but have some of us overlooked behavior theory as an extension of looks maybe?
Was reading this tid bit on Lookism and can't help but wonder if behavior can make up for slightly below average looks or average++ looks when enough looks can't meet the demands of most women. I've seen low inhib/IDGAF attitude guys that get laid that aren't facially attractive, but aren't ugly either -- pretty much dead average. I always wonder how maxing this out can help me since I'm not incel-tier (4.5-5 PSL) but still question how much this has real significance when you're sub 8 and how much success is possible. Not standard PUA bullshit, but just how you carry yourself and body language/etc. Obviously I can't see this working if you're beneath a certain level of looks or rarely happening, but what are the thoughts on behavior theory here? Some incels here hold on to other -cel issues besides looks, but is it logical?
Can things other than looks fuck us if we don't maximize in every possible way needed? Or do we just need to be Chad for all of our other shortcomings to be ignored? If we can't attract many women solely with looks, would it be wise to "behaviormaxx" too?
Discuss? @Zyros weigh in since you're against this and believe it's 100% looks.
Was reading this tid bit on Lookism and can't help but wonder if behavior can make up for slightly below average looks or average++ looks when enough looks can't meet the demands of most women. I've seen low inhib/IDGAF attitude guys that get laid that aren't facially attractive, but aren't ugly either -- pretty much dead average. I always wonder how maxing this out can help me since I'm not incel-tier (4.5-5 PSL) but still question how much this has real significance when you're sub 8 and how much success is possible. Not standard PUA bullshit, but just how you carry yourself and body language/etc. Obviously I can't see this working if you're beneath a certain level of looks or rarely happening, but what are the thoughts on behavior theory here? Some incels here hold on to other -cel issues besides looks, but is it logical?
Can things other than looks fuck us if we don't maximize in every possible way needed? Or do we just need to be Chad for all of our other shortcomings to be ignored? If we can't attract many women solely with looks, would it be wise to "behaviormaxx" too?
Discuss? @Zyros weigh in since you're against this and believe it's 100% looks.
Last edited: