RageFuel Does any boomer parent you deal with imply, or talk about how they had a shitty upbringing?

[Pinpoint]

My dad did. In North Dakota with his retarded baby boomer style level family who were all hicks essentialyl.
I don't know hwy hicks are so irritable.
It's stupid. Like their parents all smoke and drank and got GMO molecules hoarded into their genetic makeup.
And they literally cant control how irritable they are.
I disbelieve in allowing autistic people to be irritable.
If they can't handle the pressure of etiquette then let them burn.
Better an inherent asshole gets beat into shape than for the rest of us to deal with THEIR dysfunction.
There's a very sad reality that so many boomers/ hillbillies/ etc. have distractibility (bluepill prone) and irritable (emotional rather than rational)

 

[StaroRavager]

My parents never talk much about their upbringing aside from a few stories here and there, reading between the lines though I can see that they have some deep rooted issues that stem from childhood

 

[Pinpoint]

My parents never talk much about their upbringing aside from a few stories here and there, reading between the lines though I can see that they have some deep rooted issues that stem from childhood

Do either of them have a mood disorder that constantly gets the blame of it on their past?

 

[StaroRavager]

Do either of them have a mood disorder that constantly gets the blame of it on their past?

I wouldn't say they have any disorders. They have some issues but as far as I know they would fly under the radar of any specialist

 

[Pinpoint]

I wouldn't say they have any disorders. They have some issues but as far as I know they would fly under the radar of any specialist

Specialists don't have the equipment to truly probe.
Most people don't bother to even go.
Some people are chronically irritable because of genetic mutations from shitty boomer ignorant drug usage/ inbreeding.
And most of them are so slave to their instincts/ gloom-sighted to the point of not giving a shit to even look into it. Volatile cycle where all you can do is try and seek refuge amidst someone's dysfunction.
They say a situation can only be as functioning insofar as how you can deal with the dysfunction of the most dysfunctionable.

 

[StaroRavager]

Specialists don't have the equipment to truly probe.
Most people don't bother to even go.
Some people are chronically irritable because of genetic mutations from shitty boomer ignorant drug usage/ inbreeding.
And most of them are so slave to their instincts/ gloom-sighted to the point of not giving a shit to even look into it. Volatile cycle where all you can do is try and seek refuge amidst someone's dysfunction.
They say a situation can only be as functioning insofar as how you can deal with the dysfunction of the most dysfunctionable.

In my parents' case they're just too arrogant to admit they have problems. They always downplay their faults or dismiss them entirely

 

[Pinpoint]

In my parents' case they're just too arrogant to admit they have problems. They always downplay their faults or dismiss them entirely

They downplay or reconvey them probably.
Like always blaming it on exhaustion constraints, rather than irritability, or workplace responsibility, or whatever.
You can pose up good points to keep the need/ urgency to point out them as the problem by saying it was them who have flaw after flaw behind, and they'll always say that it is us who has to give them the ease-treatment, instead of for them to reform.
Excuse after excuse after excuse.
Same thing with women.
Oh and if you keep trying to keep it going then they will go ahead and play the impatience/ enough is enough card. And then no matter how good your case, you then become the antagonist/ aggressive whiny victim, instead of the insulted party.

 

[Words2_live_bye]

Nearly all parents do is talk about how "hard" and "miserable" their lives were when they were younger.
Can't wait till boomers die off tbh

 

[Michael15651]

Nearly all parents do is talk about how "hard" and "miserable" their lives were when they were younger.
Can't wait till boomers die off tbh

 

[StaroRavager]

They downplay or reconvey them probably.
Like always blaming it on exhaustion constraints, rather than irritability, or workplace responsibility, or whatever.
You can pose up good points to keep the need/ urgency to point out them as the problem by saying it was them who have flaw after flaw behind, and they'll always say that it is us who has to give them the ease-treatment, instead of for them to reform.
Excuse after excuse after excuse.
Same thing with women.
Oh and if you keep trying to keep it going then they will go ahead and play the impatience/ enough is enough card. And then no matter how good your case, you then become the antagonist/ aggressive whiny victim, instead of the insulted party.

You’re 100% right, there’s just no convincing some people. It’s best to let them plod along to their eventual end and take as much from them as you can

 

[Pinpoint]

You’re 100% right, there’s just no convincing some people. It’s best to let them plod along to their eventual end and take as much from them as you can

They are deliberaetly unconvinced and you will never trickle down all their excuses (that they'd gladly put before addressing the things the faults of the things they want to protect for their selfish agendas, THINGS THAT ARE MOST DEFINITELY AT FAULT) before playing the impatience constraint, and then you become the aggressor rather than the one due for justice.

 

[StaroRavager]

They are deliberaetly unconvinced and you will never trickle down all their excuses (that they'd gladly put before addressing the things the faults of the things they want to protect for their selfish agendas, THINGS THAT ARE MOST DEFINITELY AT FAULT) before playing the impatience constraint, and then you become the aggressor rather than the one due for justice.

Even once you uncover their unhanded little tactics, they’ll simply label you as “paranoid” and “jaded” and once they have the game is all over. You must always be the first one to frame the situation before they get the chance to do so themselves

 

[Pinpoint]

Even once you uncover their unhanded little tactics, they’ll simply label you as “paranoid” and “jaded” and once they have the game is all over. You must always be the first one to frame the situation before they get the chance to do so themselves

Yes, any label from their pretended protruding portrayal that allows them to control the course of the conversation from their stilted stance in it.
A conversation can only course on based on the other person. And when they play stupid, soft, ignorant, indifferent, irritable, etc. well there you go, conversation over.
We live in a humanitarian helpout world right now. So if you are the one who is invading another's perosnal space hten that's far more

It's not really about how ideas in the conversation get traded. The only thing people try to control is A. their reputation and B. if the conversation will turn out into something that calls for the humanitarian/ sensibility helpout obligation ACTION that calls for people to do what's right... and that will impact their actions and their path to control the tangible resources.
People can say what they want. But peopel don't want the situation to give their resources to love, courtesy, justice.
But no one wants to be seen in a negative light, no matter how much that is implied already by the way they're being so they will create a fake frame of their role in the situation through false justifications/ fake constraints/ veneering innocence, reasons behind their tangible actions.
People want to lean/ put as much possible course-shift to not what's right, but what helps their self interest. And even if they want to do the indifferent/ uncaring thing they'll just say/ phrase/ portray themselves for the fakest/ insincere reasons. (Which are, fake constraints/ fake obligations and overwhelment like how they have to work, they're tired, their lives were shit, etc.).

Women often pose themselves out as the soft/ irritable just so they can manipulate the conversation. Foids do this so that by giving into their strawman they can label you however they want. Like if a girl asks about politics at work. How's that gonna turn out?

 

[Deleted member 15752]

The fact that they had a child is enough for me to know that they barely went through anything.

 

[Pinpoint]

The fact that they had a child is enough for me to know that they barely went through anything.

what makes you say that?

 

[Deleted member 15752]

what makes you say that?

Love and sex is a powerfull tool thats bonds humans together. Its what makes them human. The fact that I didnt even experience 1% of it makes me utter subhuman trash.

 

[Pinpoint]

Love and sex is a powerfull tool thats bonds humans together. Its what makes them human. The fact that I didnt even experience 1% of it makes me utter subhuman trash.

Which is definitely a benefit indeed. One that offsets them from a lto of the shit they probably had.
Waht do you think of all the peopel who make the concession that anyone can get laid? lol maybe back then or.

 

[Deleted member 15752]

Which is definitely a benefit indeed. One that offsets them from a lto of the shit they probably had.
Waht do you think of all the peopel who make the concession that anyone can get laid? lol maybe back then or.

I just ignore those types of retarded questions. EVERYONE can get laid with enough money...

 

[StaroRavager]

Yes, any label from their pretended protruding portrayal that allows them to control the course of the conversation from their stilted stance in it.
A conversation can only course on based on the other person. And when they play stupid, soft, ignorant, indifferent, irritable, etc. well there you go, conversation over.
We live in a humanitarian helpout world right now. So if you are the one who is invading another's perosnal space hten that's far more

It's not really about how ideas in the conversation get traded. The only thing people try to control is A. their reputation and B. if the conversation will turn out into something that calls for the humanitarian/ sensibility helpout obligation ACTION that calls for people to do what's right... and that will impact their actions and their path to control the tangible resources.
People can say what they want. But peopel don't want the situation to give their resources to love, courtesy, justice.
But no one wants to be seen in a negative light, no matter how much that is implied already by the way they're being so they will create a fake frame of their role in the situation through false justifications/ fake constraints/ veneering innocence, reasons behind their tangible actions.
People want to lean/ put as much possible course-shift to not what's right, but what helps their self interest. And even if they want to do the indifferent/ uncaring thing they'll just say/ phrase/ portray themselves for the fakest/ insincere reasons. (Which are, fake constraints/ fake obligations and overwhelment like how they have to work, they're tired, their lives were shit, etc.).

Women often pose themselves out as the soft/ irritable just so they can manipulate the conversation. Foids do this so that by giving into their strawman they can label you however they want. Like if a girl asks about politics at work. How's that gonna turn out?

Well put, people are really easy to figure out once you understand the foundations of their behavior

 

[demonanus]

My dad did. In North Dakota with his retarded baby boomer style level family who were all hicks essentialyl.
I don't know hwy hicks are so irritable.
It's stupid. Like their parents all smoke and drank and got GMO molecules hoarded into their genetic makeup.
And they literally cant control how irritable they are.
I disbelieve in allowing autistic people to be irritable.
If they can't handle the pressure of etiquette then let them burn.
Better an inherent asshole gets beat into shape than for the rest of us to deal with THEIR dysfunction.
There's a very sad reality that so many boomers/ hillbillies/ etc. have distractibility (bluepill prone) and irritable (emotional rather than rational)

GMO can't alter your DNA you dumbass

 

[Salustio]

Are you a hapa bastard son of a racemixer?

 

[Deleted member 4159]

My mom does all the time. In fact, she uses it as a justification for her mistakes in parenting me.

 

[Henry de Montherlant]

The fact that they had a child is enough for me to know that they barely went through anything.

 

[Insomniac]

My dad always lectures me about how much harder he had it. It’s true but it can get very annoying and come off as condescending.

 

[mylifeistrash]

so much irony in a boomer lecturing anyone when US GOVERNMENT DATA shows anyone under 40 let alone 20 has it exponentially harder

 

[Pinpoint]

GMO can't alter your DNA you dumbass

Learn epigenetics retard

Are you a hapa bastard son of a racemixer?

What datapoint of me being asian tipped you to the point of making that a curiosity?

 

[Frankenstein's M.]

Yeah but then hypocritically does the same with their children