Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Do you thinka site with true freedom of speech is good?

hopeless_cel

hopeless_cel

Roped at 13 sept 2024
★★
Joined
Apr 29, 2024
Posts
4,107
Basically the ultimate freedom of speech where you can post ANYTHING and you won't be in trouble.

I personally strictly against faggy and pedo shit but since it's true freedom of speech then those gonna be allowed too

What you guys think? Should site like that exist? Or it's just too much?
 
IMG 1716
 
Basically the ultimate freedom of speech where you can post ANYTHING and you won't be in trouble.

I personally strictly against faggy and pedo shit but since it's true freedom of speech then those gonna be allowed too

What you guys think? Should site like that exist? Or it's just too much?
Don't be so sure of this fed site, ofc they're not gonna hound you like normie social media sites would if you're someone notable for saying nigger or something but you sure would get a visit if you explicitly mention your plan of action for something violent that meets or does not meet the Brandenburg principle
 
Don't be so sure of this fed site, ofc they're not gonna hound you like normie social media sites would if you're someone notable for saying nigger or something but you sure would get a visit if you explicitly mention your plan of action for something violent that meets or does not meet the Brandenburg principle
No one gonna reach slums of dhaka to catch me
 
pornography is not speech so i dont see the second concern. definition of free speech is the right to criticizes and put fourth ideas, art will also fall under this category due to being a form of expression. is porn a form of expression? i would argue not because you are not proposing a idea or discussing anything, closest is drawing (hentai),but that is more because it requires effort and some resemblance of skill.
 
pornography is not speech so i dont see the second concern. definition of free speech is the right to criticizes and put fourth ideas, art will also fall under this category due to being a form of expression. is porn a form of expression? i would argue not because you are not proposing a idea or discussing anything, closest is drawing (hentai),but that is more because it requires effort and some resemblance of skill.
Internet speech is basically talking about anything, CP, fag shit, banning cp and fag shit is also technically not giving the guy freedom which is good imo
 
Internet speech is basically talking about anything, CP, fag shit, banning cp and fag shit is also technically not giving the guy freedom which is good imo
discussions around the topic would be free speech but not production or consumption of such content. i assume you discussing any topic and not posting whatever one want?
 
discussions around the topic would be free speech but not production or consumption of such content. i assume you discussing any topic and not posting whatever one want?
Then what would be the blocking of consumption of such topic be related to? Isn't it also blocking freedom?
 
Every pro free speech guy would actually be against a forum with full freedom of expression or speech

Cuz there will be Child Porn, and even more worse shit.
 
Then what would be the blocking of consumption of such topic be related to? Isn't it also blocking freedom?
by consumption i talk about media such as images or video, not discussions. and porn do not have artistic merit, unless drawn, but even then is questionable
 
One thing is sure

It would be war among users
 
by consumption i talk about media such as images or video, not discussions. and porn do not have artistic merit, unless drawn, but even then is questionable
I consider sending anything on the internet as a form of speech so yeah even real stuff can also be a speech in my eyes
 
I consider sending anything on the internet as a form of speech so yeah even real stuff can also be a speech in my eyes
i think here lies the issue, we both have different concepts as what constitute speech. you argue everything is speech, will i argue there most either be a idea or artistic merit to be considered speech. as such by my argument porn would not be considered speech due the lack of artistic merit, as such not speech. your argument makes porn speech due to being human made

neither is right or wrong but a discussion is most desired
 
i think here lies the issue, we both have different concepts as what constitute speech. you argue everything is speech, will i argue there most either be a idea or artistic merit to be considered speech. as such by my argument porn would not be considered speech due the lack of artistic merit, as such not speech. your argument makes porn speech due to being human made

neither is right or wrong but a discussion is most desired
Yeah lol, let's end this with: are you okay with a site if they can post/share anything about anything?
 
Posting or indulging in CP is not free speech, it is a crime.
Having an opinion or world view should not be a crime.
 
Yeah lol, let's end this with: are you okay with a site if they can post/share anything about anything?
if there is actually a idea behind it or artistic skill yes. porn is just entertainment made to appeal to basic human emotion, nothing is being said no concept explored. if just posting whatever then no.
 
Posting or indulging in CP is not free speech, it is a crime.
Having an opinion or world view should not be a crime.
I mean if a world view indicates a person likes to inflict harm then that world view should also be a crime tho?
 
I mean if a world view indicates a person likes to inflict harm then that world view should also be a crime tho?
Words do not harm anyone, but actions do.
However threats to cause physical harm to an individual should be punished by the collective aka the law.

Assault is a crime, rape is a crime ect.
So if you threaten these then that is also a crime.

Saying a woman's role is to look after the family is not a crime.
Saying abortion is murder is not a crime.
Saying Europe should be for Europeans is not a crime.
 
No, some moderation and restriction is neccessary, otherwise it would evolve into total chaos or anarchy
 
The only laws that should be followed are laws of Nature itself, everything else is slavery
The law is what the collective decides.
If the collective decides murder is wrong then it is wrong and you will be punished.
Humans have evolved into social creatures therefore societies will is the law.
Regardless of how kikes warp society.
 
The law is what the collective decides.
If the collective decides murder is wrong then it is wrong and you will be punished.
Humans have evolved into social creatures therefore societies will is the law.
Regardless of how kikes warp society.
Well yes I actually agree. However I still think there is naturally, objectivelly no right and wrong, the only reason Im following those manmade laws is to not get in trouble and because I know I stand 0 chance against the government but if I was really high IQ, sneaky and had the power necessary I would probably do a lot of things considered evil by that same law. However in the context of this forum I personally agree with the rules so I don't feel pressure when following them
 
Well yes I actually agree. However I still think there is naturally, objectivelly no right and wrong, the only reason Im following those manmade laws is to not get in trouble and because I know I stand 0 chance against the government but if I was really high IQ, sneaky and had the power necessary I would probably do a lot of things considered evil by that same law. However in the context of this forum I personally agree with the rules so I don't feel pressure when following them
Yeah individuals can view different morality differently.
If you kill someone's child you may feel morally indifferent, but they may see it as abhorrent.
If a majority see it one way they will force their view on the others, on pain of death if it is necessary.
If you cannot overcome them then your actions will lead to your death.
That is how basic societal law works.
 
Yeah individuals can view different morality differently.
If you kill someone's child you may feel morally indifferent, but they may see it as abhorrent.
If a majority see it one way they will force their view on the others, on pain of death if it is necessary.
If you cannot overcome them then your actions will lead to your death.
That is how basic societal law works.
Yes I get how it works, which is exactly the reason why Im following the laws of the government. I agree with you
 
Yes I get how it works, which is exactly the reason why Im following the laws of the government. I agree with you

Yes I get how it works, which is exactly the reason why Im following the laws of the government. I agree with you
We shall see how well this works when Jew Governments actively work against the will of the majority, that will be interesting.
If they can hold the monopoly on violence, or if the military will side with majority.
 
Pedo hurts kiddies so it's bad and shouldn't be allowed.

Gayness doesn't exits and it's something jews invented to feminize and subdue the population, so no it should not be discussed. It only should be discussed in the context of being a mental illness.
 

Similar threads

SecularNeo-Khazar
Replies
14
Views
327
Rabbi Schneerson
Rabbi Schneerson
NEETcel2023
Replies
4
Views
332
prajeet88
prajeet88

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top