Discussion Do you think that in the future people will be more beautiful or uglier?

[Limitcel]

Do you think that today's economic and social conditions allow an eugenics focused on appearance (which may even affect women in the long run, to the argument that "only men are affected by this") or do you think that people who reproduce are the worst?
Or any other argument, in the future people will be uglier or prettier, or will nothing really change?

 

[Cryotron]

ugly women are the problem

 

[ItsOver4cel]

Considering filthy nigger immigrants pollute the global population (since whites and most GL countries are getting their birthrates tanked by feminism) and subhuman whores are having kids unlike their looksmatches, there's not much that indicates the world will get prettier imo.

 

[Grodd]

Considering filthy nigger immigrants pollute the global population (since whites and most GL countries are getting their birthrates tanked by feminism) and subhuman whores are having kids unlike their looksmatches, there's not much that indicates the world will get prettier imo.

 

[lowz1r]

uglier because most people are frauding their looks with surgery

especially foids with makeup

 

[Biowaste Removal]

Too many ugly foids reproducing because of juggernaut law + hypergamy

More and more hormones and pollutants (like microplastics, but in the future will be worse) in processed food, medicine and water

 

[Limitcel]

are we living a behaviorial sink?

 

[Fat Link]

Uglier.

The Jews are pushing dysgenic hard.

As it’s far easier for them to rule over a cosmopolitan alienated disunited racial goulash than a racially pure homogeneous people.

 

[Undervalued]

If current trends continue, there won't be that many people in the future. By 2100, it could be a Children of Men-level dystopia. From now to 2100, civilisation may plateau or even decline.

The biggest blackpill is that the future may never come. What if we just stagnate with minor changes here and there?

 

[Limitcel]

The biggest blackpill is that the future may never come. What if we just stagnate with minor changes here and there?

I think we live in one of the worst times because I prefer it all to end than for it to continue like this for the rest of human existence

 

[faded]

Do you think that today's economic and social conditions allow an eugenics focused on appearance (which may even affect women in the long run, to the argument that "only men are affected by this") or do you think that people who reproduce are the worst?
Or any other argument, in the future people will be uglier or prettier, or will nothing really change?

Shalom

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

Uglier.

The Jews are pushing dysgenic hard.

As it’s far easier for them to rule over a cosmopolitan alienated disunited racial goulash than a racially pure homogeneous people.

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

Uglier because subhuman whores are reproducing and also disgusting mixed creatures being born.

 

[Clavicus Vile]

The ugly will get uglier, The attractive will get more attractive.

 

[Cnidoblastos]

racial mixing is on the rise

 

[MisanthropicMemes]

Considering filthy nigger immigrants pollute the global population (since whites and most GL countries are getting their birthrates tanked by feminism) and subhuman whores are having kids unlike their looksmatches, there's not much that indicates the world will get prettier imo.

 

[Spooky_Heejin]

Considering filthy nigger immigrants pollute the global population (since whites and most GL countries are getting their birthrates tanked by feminism) and subhuman whores are having kids unlike their looksmatches, there's not much that indicates the world will get prettier imo.

Eventually most people will look like the dysgenic freaks from Horizon Forbidden West.