hypersexual ≠ hypergamous
Experiment Do you think that all foids are non-monogamous hypersexual sluts?
If given the option they will be 100%
Yes.
It´s how they operate under our current environment.
In the past this was NOT possible, due to shaming and religious presence being pretty high in society.
But that era is over.
It´s how they operate under our current environment.
In the past this was NOT possible, due to shaming and religious presence being pretty high in society.
But that era is over.
I was just looking at one of my old threads, there was a news article about women mostly searching for violent porn, with top search results being female gangbang and "rape". These are searches done in private.
Your question is easily answered by the facts we have. All the facts point to yes: women are pigsluts.
Your question is easily answered by the facts we have. All the facts point to yes: women are pigsluts.
G
Eh, there are some who are not hypersexual. It's retarded to think that way just because so many are. If you're going for the "options" argument, then you could say the same for males, albeit we'd probably be fucking a wider variety of everything we can find instead of just the top. Males aren't very hypergamous; females are, and that's where the difference lies. This poll isn't asking about hypergamy, though.
JFL at copers who try to pretend that females aren't hypersexual. Thats a myth from the Renaissance.
They only put it out for Chad.
Also, to add to this: IMO the only reason women weren't hypersexual in the past was because of patriarchy keeping them in check. they couldn't be hypersexual because it would be an embarrassment to their husband and to themselves to reveal themselves to other males. They couldn't even show their ankles in public for some time. Once women got the right to vote (yes I'm being srs) things really went to shit. We gave women too many rights essentially, and when a 2/10 can fuck a 6/10 chad any day of the week on Tinder, things will only get worse.
a lot of women still acted like sluts behind their husbands back tbh. That and they would fuck or at least be sexual before marriage.
True, but I guess my poorly written point was that society looked down upon adultery and things of that nature, they viewed sleeping around with multiple men etc as disgusting and against moral values. So yes it was still going on, but probably much less so due to the consequences. This also relates to how America and other European nations placed a heavy emphasis on Christianity in some form.
no, girls crave attention much more than sex, we males are tho, but I don't think that one is debatable.
Hyper resource grabbers. I'm 100 percent convinced they only get aroused by men who mog them by 5 SMV. Everything else is betabuxx.
Is Chad nearby?
D
Hypersexual and Hypergamous. They want both quantity and quality together, if possible.
AWALT
Non-monogamous, yeah, the vast majority. Hypersexual? No. Women are low T, only nymphomaniacs are like that.
No, they are monogamous to only one chad and they are horny only one week in the month.
If you count their betabuxxers or being part of a chad harem then yes but I don't count these cases tbh.
In their base nature, yes. But that can be somewhat restricted by society.
They do this stuff for Chad. Doesn't matter how prim and proper you think your princess is. The stories I've heard... from men and women alike.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
