Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

It's Over Do you think non-chads will become extinct in the next 100 to 150 years?

Will unattractive men become extinct in the next century or so?

  • Yes

    Votes: 7 10.9%
  • Lol cope

    Votes: 57 89.1%

  • Total voters
    64
B

beta_max

mentalcel
-
Joined
Jan 11, 2020
Posts
2,101
I'm talking about west in particular. While I see poor people roping in third world ethnic lands.
 
Women have been hypergamous since the dawn of time and ugly men have always existed. What could possibly happen in the next 100 years to make such a drastic change?
 
Existing chads will just become incels, while new, gigachads are being bred.
 
Ugly men will always exist as long as ugly women can reproduce.
 
this is only possible if all sub 8/10s rope on the spot and the top 20% impregnate the top 20% of women tbh even then facial deformities can happen or autistics will still find a way in this world
also if chads just impregnate with low smv women there is a chance of him getting her genes and being an incel so no
 
Nope, that won't happen.
 
Being an incel in the next 100 years is now considered a crime ranking above cold blooded murder. They will round up all the suspected and known incels (bottom 80% of men) to gas them to death. This solution is temporary, but the purge of the 80% will continue for centuries in order to weed out unattractive males.
 
Being an incel in the next 100 years is now considered a crime ranking above cold blooded murder. They will round up all the suspected and known incels (bottom 80% of men) to gas them to death. This solution is temporary, but the purge of the 80% will continue for centuries in order to weed out unattractive males.

You can never weed out enogh unnatractive males
 
Women have been hypergamous since the dawn of time and ugly men have always existed. What could possibly happen in the next 100 years to make such a drastic change?

I mean even normies are having it rough in the west, at best getting a used up cunt that doesn't commit, as the standards skyrocket. it was never like that. Or I could be wrong.
 
No because ugly women will always exist and spread their genes
 
No because they will always need us to be doing the hard and dirty jobs to keep their societies running. Blue collar incels are needed so they can be enjoying the glistening sun on the beach without any obligation.
 
Ugly women still reproduce. Balding genes are found in the X chromosome, a man can only get his balding genes from his mom. Even if all men with balding genes suddenly dropped dead today the next generation would still have plenty of norwooding men.
 
Nope, curries and rices will still arranged marriage/ m-muh parents values/ beta provider maxx.
JBW incels will still boil those instant noodles
 
Nope, curries and rices will still arranged marriage/ m-muh parents values/ beta provider maxx.
JBW incels will still boil those instant noodles

You got a point there.
No because they will always need us to be doing the hard and dirty jobs to keep their societies running. Blue collar incels are needed so they can be enjoying the glistening sun on the beach without any obligation.

chads could do these jobs
 
I mean even normies are having it rough in the west, at best getting a used up cunt that doesn't commit, as the standards skyrocket. it was never like that. Or I could be wrong.
What he means is women always wanted chad they just had to have sex with guys they considered ugly for survival while now women have more power and more money then the average gut does.
 
The bar will just be stupidly high.

Chads will be incel. Tetrachads will be normie.
 
Of course not.
 
that's something I didn't know until now
There's more to it but long story short that's the gist of it. Balding is caused by DHT, which damages the hair follicles until they stop producing hair. But the sensitivity of the hair follicles to DHT is the most important factor, and it is highly variable (that's where the genes in the X chromosome come in) and it increases with age.

This is why men go bald as they age despite the fact that their testosterone (and so their DHT) drops after 30-35. This is why even low test soys can go bald, DHT sensitivity and time are the most important factors. The accumulated damage and the increase in sensitivity is what makes you bald.

This is also why women are almost immune to balding. They have 10-20 times less test, so about as much less DHT. Though old women can lose their hair. So your average foid never, ever thinks of herself as carrying norwood genetics. She filters men thinking it'll guarantee that her kids won't go bald. It's cruel because the norwood cycle will never end.

Finasteride/propecia stop the conversion of test into DHT. That's why they work. Minox is completely different, it just promotes hair growth.
 
I don't think so
 
Genetic trash foids are still breeding...

Ugly men will always exist as long as ugly women can reproduce.

Ugly women still reproduce. Balding genes are found in the X chromosome, a man can only get his balding genes from his mom. Even if all men with balding genes suddenly dropped dead today the next generation would still have plenty of norwooding men.
 
Fucking cope. The number of incels will just increase. Chads can have incel kids thats not impossible btw
 
I think by the end of the 21st century the average height will be 6'0" - 6'3" in Europe, Australia and North America purely because of selection.

People will be a bit more attractive than today, but there will always be subhumans.
 
Ugly men will always exist as long as ugly women can reproduce.
Yup. Unless ugly women could be sterilized before reaching puberty then there will be no way to eliminate ugly genes from the gene pool.
 
As long as your subhuman looksmatches keep getting fucked by chad, there will always be subhumans
 
Incels will exist as long as ugly foids that give birth to them exists. Not considering that is low IQ.

The only way to erradicate ugliness and inceldom is to make chads never date down and dating only his looksmatched stacies.

Eventually many foids would become cat ladies or lesbians as they wouldnt' even consider to date a man that isn't good looking.
 
Last edited:
So long as sperm banks exists even the ugliest foid can produce and create future users here.
 
That'll never happen. If you know how genetic recombination works then you know why this will never be possible.
 
Existing chads will just become incels, while new, gigachads are being bred.
And ugly foids will still fuck so more incels will be created
 
Cope low status women will continue existing
 
Chad is just defined by a percentile of men, not anything in absolute terms.
 
We have archaeological evidence that Homo sapien has been on the planet for around 300,000 years and genetic evidence points to around 800,000. If non-chads still exist at this point then they will always exist.
 
Chads will never cease to exist.
 
People also don't consider actual reproduction factors. Considering the increasing poor health of women due to worse eating habits, increased alcohol consumption/abuse, years of birth control and the fact so many delay having children until they are older and having fewer of them overall, the quality of children actually being born is going to take a severe hit regardless of the quality of the parents.

Also understand that the number of poor quality genes actually existing in human populations has experienced a sharp increase within the last 100-150 years. Death during childbirth weeded out shit tons of females and high infant mortality weeded out tons bad genes wrt health & low/poor parenting.
 
People also don't consider actual reproduction factors. Considering the increasing poor health of women due to worse eating habits, increased alcohol consumption/abuse, years of birth control and the fact so many delay having children until they are older and having fewer of them overall, the quality of children actually being born is going to take a severe hit regardless of the quality of the parents.

Also understand that the number of poor quality genes actually existing in human populations has experienced a sharp increase within the last 100-150 years. Death during childbirth weeded out shit tons of females and high infant mortality weeded out tons bad genes wrt health & low/poor parenting.

Not to mention decreased quality of food and nutrition, also add lack of physical exercise into the mix.
 
No. While harmful recessive alleles will be selected against, it's almost impossible for them to completely disappear from a gene pool. That's because natural selection can only 'see' the phenotype, not the genotype. Recessive alleles can hide out in heterozygotes, allowing them to persist in gene pools.
 
A chad and a stacy can still make a. Incel
 

Similar threads

Sasukecel
Replies
60
Views
1K
Sasukecel
Sasukecel
NEETcel2023
Replies
33
Views
661
copemaxx9002
copemaxx9002
sennaGTR
Replies
16
Views
519
Biowaste Removal
B

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top