P
@gymletethnicel , before he left, claimed that sugar baby girlfriends are different from prostitutes because you can have a "relationship" with them, and therefore are ascension. i think that's a bullshit cope. thoughts?
Experiment Do you consider sugar baby girlfriends to be ascension?
It's betabuxxing but you pay even more and she still doesn't like you
D
No. It is cucked.
P
exactly.
It's basically betabuxing without even getting a proper girlfriend
No. But it might be the option left for some of us.
the topic of what is ascension or not is almost always a matter of semantics. whatever someone wants to call it, i'd say it's a shit deal because sugar daddies spend more money than they would on regular whores and at the end of the day they are the same ugly fucks they were before they found the sugar baby so the same issues will still persist in day to day life.
Jfl for paying for sex
Depends if you live together
Depends if you live together
Depends if you live together
D
NO. It's a more expensive Betabuxxing.
That's just another word for being a betabuxx, betabuxx is not ascension.
The only option left for me.
D
No ofcourse not, they are "dignified" prostitutes. Nothing else.
D
No, it's just an escort
N
no because it is a contract almost
Sugar baby betabuxxing is prostitution, it’s expensive. I’d rather have comfy home and a hobby at the same cost.
It’s bettER to invest.
It’s bettER to invest.
Betabux relationships are worse than Prostitution, Betabuxxxing is only second to Shit like Onlyfans and findom.
An Escort with almost no passion or sex for the Betabuxxer.
Last edited:
Agree, and to think most men are in one
Its over for many, many men. I am glad that I was born with Aspergers and a Non-NT brain, so that I can avoid this Betabux shit and this foid manipulation.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
