It is dangerous to say that "foids are the gatekeepers of sex" - because, foids are taking over everything, and eventually toilets will become the gatekeepers of everything. 
Discussion Do you consider foids to be "the gatekeepers of sex"?
well “gatekeepers of sex” is a subset of “gatekeepers of everything” so girls are gatekeepers of sex regardless
In this soyciety yes, go back a century it was not
Usually, I don't share my opinion when it comes to polls - however, this is the state of males in 2022 - eight incels responded unanimously that "yes" foids are the gatekeepers of sex"...
It's over.
I was watching a game show on television, and a team of black foids were on the show, the name of their team was,"California Moms". These black foids were disgusting, one was so fat that she looked like she would need to purchase two airplane tickets while traveling. I thought to myself, "How the fuck am I a kissless virgin - while these ugly obese cartoon character-looking black foids have had sex?". And to rub salt in my wound - the sheboons are from my home state.
It's over.
I was watching a game show on television, and a team of black foids were on the show, the name of their team was,"California Moms". These black foids were disgusting, one was so fat that she looked like she would need to purchase two airplane tickets while traveling. I thought to myself, "How the fuck am I a kissless virgin - while these ugly obese cartoon character-looking black foids have had sex?". And to rub salt in my wound - the sheboons are from my home state.
Obviously
Naw fuck that (no pun intended).
My grandfather did not clear airfields in Europe during World War 2 for me to live like a slave to "toilets being the gatekeepers of sex".
Men will get blamed for rape easily because we are physically stronger than foids, but I have always hated the stupid idea that "foids are the gatekeepers of sex".
Yea, the reality is that they indeed are at least right now. If men were then we would all get laid.
do you consider 2+2=4?
Why was it even a question
M
ye ye they are
Do you consider the sky to be blue?
The selectors select, even a prostitute selects her clients (as an ugly short Nigger 99% of prostitutes reject me, but I can still walk up to a tiny minority that wouldn't). If even a minority of toilets would choose to sleep with incels the reality of the dating market would be very different.
But it's also important to realise in the Age of Computers that the selection process is being manipulated even further. Even if there's a toilet that wants you and you're both on Tinder the algorithm deliberately makes you difficult to find as it prioritises Chad's (I also noticed that you have to swipe through A LOT of Stacies before the first Stacylite, let alone a Becky appears) because of the algorithm, this means that the men that eventually do see Landwhale Becky will be so jaded and desperate that they'd do anything. Even Chad's that just want to casually sleep around and not commit prefer to go for her.
The idea that toilets are the exclusive selectors of sex is greatly exaggerated, otherwise we'd never see Becky's simp for Chad like we see Simps for any toilet. The difference is just that they are playing at a much easier level.
An often cited inverse is that "toilets are the gatekeepers of sex and men are the gatekeepers of commitment" but this fails to see that it's only VALUABLE commitment that toilets seek, that's what Chad's are gatekeeping from Stacy and Becky, and what Chadlite is gatekeeping from our looksmatches.
So while I think that the answer is "yes" due to a variety of biological, psychological, and social reasons. I also believe that people underestimate how much influence Corporations and robots (computers, algorithms, Etc.) Have on this selection process.
Chad's are biologically inclined to like Chad, but if the algorithm didn't push Chad so much on toilets then they wouldn't be so underwhelmed by Normies, but because they keep clicking on Chad's the algorithm knows to reward Chad's because there's a financial incentive to do so.
Ironically the programmers who make these programmes often end up divorced by their own creations.
But it's also important to realise in the Age of Computers that the selection process is being manipulated even further. Even if there's a toilet that wants you and you're both on Tinder the algorithm deliberately makes you difficult to find as it prioritises Chad's (I also noticed that you have to swipe through A LOT of Stacies before the first Stacylite, let alone a Becky appears) because of the algorithm, this means that the men that eventually do see Landwhale Becky will be so jaded and desperate that they'd do anything. Even Chad's that just want to casually sleep around and not commit prefer to go for her.
The idea that toilets are the exclusive selectors of sex is greatly exaggerated, otherwise we'd never see Becky's simp for Chad like we see Simps for any toilet. The difference is just that they are playing at a much easier level.
An often cited inverse is that "toilets are the gatekeepers of sex and men are the gatekeepers of commitment" but this fails to see that it's only VALUABLE commitment that toilets seek, that's what Chad's are gatekeeping from Stacy and Becky, and what Chadlite is gatekeeping from our looksmatches.
So while I think that the answer is "yes" due to a variety of biological, psychological, and social reasons. I also believe that people underestimate how much influence Corporations and robots (computers, algorithms, Etc.) Have on this selection process.
Chad's are biologically inclined to like Chad, but if the algorithm didn't push Chad so much on toilets then they wouldn't be so underwhelmed by Normies, but because they keep clicking on Chad's the algorithm knows to reward Chad's because there's a financial incentive to do so.
Ironically the programmers who make these programmes often end up divorced by their own creations.
I grew out of a need to make great all-encompassing statements about life, the universe and people in general, years ago.
So I don't know if women are the gatekeepers of sex in general. They certainly do seem to be the gatekeepers of sex for me.
So it's a "yes" from me.
So I don't know if women are the gatekeepers of sex in general. They certainly do seem to be the gatekeepers of sex for me.
So it's a "yes" from me.
Stop paying foids to rent out their holes, a recession is coming in two months you silly goy.
Fewer candlelight vigils after incels go ER.
That is exactly why I stay away from OLD, Jewburg of Meta came up with that kike way of weeding out incels. Try being an incel on Facebook.
Male's life = Call of Duty: Modern Warefare 2 on Veteran-mode Foids life = LittleBigPlanet on easy-mode.
Men are the gatekeepers of putting an expensive engagement ring on the finger of a fat landwhale who has slept with 40 different guys, and is now ready to settle down because she is 30.
Jews.
Incels are too ugly to even dream about getting married, so divorce is just another thing (like becoming a parent) that incels never need to worry about.
Based poll
An obvious yes.
For sure. A chick can always get sex no.matter how ugly/fat
B
I mean, yes and no. Yes, because they live in a society where protections by the collective of men are offered to them, and no, because men could easily overpower and rape them, if they wished, just like in the days of yore when men were in the process of building civilization with laws and have other men enforce those laws.
Women get to larp as the gatekeepers of sex, because civilized society offers them the safety and security to be able to pretend as such. Strip away all of the layers and the bullshit and it's like any other nature show: the male fucks when he wants it and only has to worry about competing with other males for access.
Women get to larp as the gatekeepers of sex, because civilized society offers them the safety and security to be able to pretend as such. Strip away all of the layers and the bullshit and it's like any other nature show: the male fucks when he wants it and only has to worry about competing with other males for access.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
