Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Experiment Do you believe PFS theory is legit?

  • Thread starter Deleted member 14866
  • Start date

title

  • It’s legit bro

  • Load of shit


Results are only viewable after voting.
Deleted member 14866

Deleted member 14866

prescriber of dogpills
-
Joined
Oct 6, 2018
Posts
14,143
Title tbh

PFS=perceived fighting success
Check @SchrodingersDick signature for reference
 
It's not a theory if it's proven by science already
 
The biggest slayers at my school were pretty boys that could get knocked down by a gust of wind. JFL

It used to be legit but women have no use for ogre cavemen anymore.
 
It used to be legit but women have no use for ogre cavemen anymore.
What? Women love brutish men, pretty boys are a dying fad, they don't fit the (((agenda)))
 
Yes, only in certain cases.
 
The biggest slayers at my school were pretty boys that could get knocked down by a gust of wind. JFL

It used to be legit but women have no use for ogre cavemen anymore.
cope to be honest not gonna lie
 
for slaying jbs? no
for everything else? yes
 
It has some truth to it (height and strength matter) but face is undoubtedly more important.

Which one of these two have more PFS? Which one do you think would be more popular with young attractive women?

97878
97879
 
It has some truth to it (height and strength matter) but face is undoubtedly more important.

Which one of these two have more PFS? Which one do you think would be more popular with young attractive women?

View attachment 97878View attachment 97879
The one on the right looks like a tranny he is unlikely to attract anyone except gay men and lesbians. The one on the left would be more popular as he looks masculine and is normie tier.
 
The biggest slayers at my school were pretty boys that could get knocked down by a gust of wind. JFL

It used to be legit but women have no use for ogre cavemen anymore.
Women start craving testosterone around late high school.. pretty boy relationships never last esp not in high school.. I knew tons of hot girls with pretty manlet boyfriends in high school.. never felt right to me.. no of those relationships lasted. The pretty boys are now struggling to find pussy and those girls all started jumpin around from high PFS guy to high PFS guy.

But once foids are out in the big bad world and need to survive, they crave large high testosterone violent men with high survival success aka high fighting scucess


OP, don’t ever doubt me my nigga. PFS is LAW
It has some truth to it (height and strength matter) but face is undoubtedly more important.

Which one of these two have more PFS? Which one do you think would be more popular with young attractive women?

View attachment 97878View attachment 97879
Face is part of PFS. “Robust, Trauma resistant craniofacial bone structure”.. it’s about chin, jaw, zygos, browridge, orbitals, maxilla, all that

It’s not airtight I’m sure there’s parts I missed and shit that we don’t even know.. but it seems to hold true both in reality (in most cases) and in theory.. there’s more to SMV than PFS, but not much more.. I don’t know where or how a big dick fits, or where baldness fits, where being lazy-eyed fits.. thought those are all very important factors
 
Last edited:
PFS is an overwhelmingly large component of the genetic fitness puzzle. Cherrypicking select anomalous examples has no real world bearing. You're just trying to strawman the theory. More often than not PFS traits are also attractive/aesthetic traits by merit of optimal hormonal profiles (zygo flanges, large jaw, hunter eyes, brick skull, thick neck, large frame). Chad is not just chad because hes handsome. Hes tall, athletic and mesomorphic as well with a lantern jaw.
 
Prettyboy theory is more legit. Chico is the highest SMV male on the planet for reason.
 
I think it's a mostly bullshit theory... except that being a tall, good looking guy will most often correlate with other qualities that will signal "perceived fighting success".
97926

From an evolutionary standpoint, humans' "fighting success" was never a big factor in overall genetic fitness. Human average height and strength actually significantly decreased with the advent of agriculture which wouldn't have been the case if women were looking for biggest, strongest, toughest guys to mate with.

Those who believe in this theory know what to do. It's the one way you can legitimately improve yourself significantly.

Personally I know a lot of tough guys who are great fighters and they're nothing special in the slayer department. Sure they have wives and gilfriends but most guys do.
 
Not theory, fact. Height and athleticism WILL attract foids, no argument.
 
all sorts of people go on dates and have gfs, if I noticed anything it's that they rarely have recessed chins, and that men that ask for ratings online and say they are a X year old virgin will very often have a recessed chin and bad profile

if i had to make a portrait of the guy that goes on dates it's: average to above average height, any weight other than obese, good chin, clean shaven and doesn't look bad without the beard fraud either (femoids hate being scraped by stubble or hair)
 
It's partly true.

Attractiveness = PFS + genetic health (things like symmetry)

Otherwise ogrecel would be an oxymoron.
 
I think it's legit in that it's greatly correlated to your SMV, but it still has many flaws it can't solely explain women's sexual preferences. Being bald has nothing on your fighting success but it's a huge SMV factor.
 
It is pointless if your face is fucked up
 

Similar threads

PersonaPimp
Replies
28
Views
519
ArabAndFramecel
ArabAndFramecel
Allah (Real)
Replies
26
Views
844
DarkStar
DarkStar
Allah (Real)
Replies
17
Views
1K
Sir Waco
Sir Waco
S
Replies
11
Views
590
justuseless
justuseless

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top