I actually agree with nearly all the points made by IncelTears and similar communities.
But with one condition: that every single one of their talking points is completed by "... if you are between 4 and 8 on the looks scale".
The advice given by anti-incels is good advice for 80% of a random population sample. Because most people, men and women alike, are physically average. The distribution of beauty, like the distribution of intelligence, obeys a bell curve:
When you happen to be in the exceptional 20% (exceptionally ugly, exceptionally pretty), normal rules and conventions of seduction cease to apply to you.
1. Yeah I call bullshit, because that's not how it works at all, you see because what is considered "average" is increasing, you are trying to apply rational thinking to a group of which there is no such thing, that group being women, you are assuming there is a "cap" on their standards, but there isn't, they are insatiable, like I've said before its like the "leaky faucet" analogy I told a guy online once who was arguing that the government should issue plastic surgery to all males so that we can be attractive and have a chance.
Now lets say one day your sink gets clogged and the faucet is leaking, the sink is now slowly but surely filling up with water, the plastic surgery guy, much who you sound like - "just improve your looks and personality", is basically foolishly advocating that we simply deepen and widen the sink as a solution to the problem of the sink overflowing, its an idiots choice, you see because like that leaking faucet, women's standards are limitless, they are insatiable, nothing will ever be truly good enough, so if all you do is widen and deepen the sink (improve the average looks and personality of the general male populace) then all you've created is a wide sink to be filled, at some point its still gonna get filled.
In short you are attacking the problem at the wrong end, on the male end, what you need to fix is the leaky faucet, you need to force women to have realistic standards, if you merely increase the maximum container for the standards women will fill it no matter what, in fact my analogy doesn't even fit in some respects because for it to truly fit the faucet would have to start leaking faster respective to the extent in which the sink was widened and deepened lol, basically making it as though no change was even made. Women cannot be reasoned with or "logicked" into making good and "fair" decisions, they are inherently terrible people, there is no changing that, they have to be forced to do the right thing, this is why the "patriarchal" society of the past was so productive and prosperous, because basically every man had a chance because we force the faucet not to leak.
2. There arguments are disingenuous because all the guys that fall into that bracket get are scraps, so we have to make all those changes about ourselves, go through all the struggle, just to get some used up whore whose finished her term on the cock carousel. Is that even worth the effort, I say no, so ironically even if their arguments did make sense, and women were reasonable and had reasonable standards with a "cap" on it, it still wouldn't be a good deal, we'd still be getting the short end of the stick settling for used up whores who only now think were good enough because they depreciated their sexual market value by waiting for their eggs to begin to worsen in quality (their fertility is getting in the shit tier range) and their body count is high and they are loose as fuck.
The only thing I agree about them is a .308 going through their skulls.
Kek too bad there is no +1 to give you
