Or are they faking pleasure, with every man who is sub-8/not chad? What’s the minimum looks requirement for women to enjoy sex?
T
I think that it can be possible if the foid is very anxious or frustrated. 
Probably, but it's not something to be proud of and more of a last resort type thing. The thing is when you say 'sub 8 men', it's not like it's ugly men, it will be 6+ men in any case.
I don't know, never asked a woman about this
Unless if he's hung.
no
being sub8 is a natural turn off
being sub8 is a natural turn off
No. In my fantasies, I always envision Shay Rose B, my "oneitis", comparing me to her previous lovers and viewing me as a sexually-incompetent loser.
P
Unless he's got a huge dick I don't think so
Jfl at those soycucks who voted yes.
D
No brainlet, it’s not “sub 8” jfl if you think a 7/10 white guy can make a becky feel good. Even 4/10 whites can give noodles the time of their lives.
dick isn’t important compared to face or height. It matters astronomically less.
This tbh
Dickpill can probably overtake heightpill and facepill if the whore is a very loose turboslut.
No, and they even get bored of above 8s eventually.
www.theatlantic.com
The Bored Sex
Women, more than men, tend to feel stultified by long-term exclusivity—despite having been taught that they were designed for it.
r/deadbedrooms
Height and dick matters more than face for sex. A tallfag with a big dick ragdolling a foid in bed will make her enjoy it regardless of his face. While on the other hand you can be a gigachad with a small dick, she won't enjoy it one bit.
Brutal dickpill
T
I remember watching this weird O'prah like late night show made by a bunch of degenerated roasties about sex and things like that when I was like 9, one of the things they were discussing is how they'd fake orgasms when having sex with a guy
I couldn't exactly understand these things at the time but I got really upset about this and thought 'how could they do that?', little did I know...
I couldn't exactly understand these things at the time but I got really upset about this and thought 'how could they do that?', little did I know...
I dont believe in absolutes. Sometimes they do, sometimes they don't. Thing is is that they dont have to settle for sex with sub-8 men that often. These whores are getting plenty chad and tyrone dick as is.
I think the man needs to be above the "is attractive" cutoff point which is pretty strict for women looking at OKCupid/Tinder/Speeddating stats for example. The other end of it is they need to believe that the man is "above them" in his worth and prospects VS theirs. For example, there are some famous men that although they are attractive, if they weren't famous and rich/high status they wouldn't exactly be pussy slayers to the same extent I expect, more like Chad-lites. So yeah, those two seems to me -- women needs to think she's beneath you and also you have to fall above the "is attractive" cutoff.
No, and they even get bored of above 8s eventually.
The Bored Sex
Women, more than men, tend to feel stultified by long-term exclusivity—despite having been taught that they were designed for it.
Haha, "despite having been taught they were designed for it" -- re monogamy. No, they weren't design for it. They are hypergamous and designed for serial relationships. The idea that they were designed for monogamy was a social lie they were forced to play as part of the bargain of having civilizing monogamous norms. Now that this bargain is out of the window and women are allowed to be their hypergamous selves, what sense does it make to keep prostitution prohibited? The mating market has radically shifted because of this unleashing of female sexual nature. Prostitution was prohibited across the United States based on that very lie that women were angelic monogamous creatures who couldn't really be that way unless forced into it -- but now we know the truth about their real non-monogamous nature, so how can the prohibition of prostitution still be justified? Why not give these happily lose women the right to be real whores to throw a bone to the hapless chaps they aren't selecting during their party years?
Last edited:
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
