Or is it just arab/Persian dna that leads to a lighter skin colour. Or is it just pure curry genetics, and some got lucky.
Discussion Do light skinned curries have any white in them?
like maybe 10% european for some curries, punjabis are like 40% dravidian 60% balochi
Stfu ignorant moron they're not Arab or Persian, have you even seen how subhuman most Persians and Arabs look, do one thing scrub yourself with bleaching powder and stop with these cucked threads fucking cuck.
Last edited:
Y
Not enough to matter. You would still not be considered white by anyone outside of India.
@your personality it is all a cope on my part. I am not light skinned enough to be considered even an arab.
R
The tone and smell of pure ass is still present
@Rambocel no matter how hard i try, I still have the generic nasal curry voice.
Curry voice now what's this again, don't attribute your shitty voice to curries again most curries have a decent deep voice, mean everything is just not about your race you're genetically fucked up and that's it. Rope or cope.
Y
It's a bad cope man. If even Southern Italians aren't completely considered white by everyone then what hope do you think Northern Indians have? Not even worth thinking about. Even if you are paler than other Indians you will still never be seen as being white by anyone except Indians that wishfully think they can pass as white. Ask @BummerDrummer what he considers white
Northern Indians like Persians and Afghanis and etc. do have very faint indo European/aryan/caucasoid blood but not enough in any of them. While theoretically an aryan afgani or northern Indian can exist, it doesn’t and if it does it’s very small number.
Do they have white? Yes. Are they white? No.
Do they have white? Yes. Are they white? No.
Aryan, lol, you're just one Jew worshipping 5' 5 Celtic cuck at best. Perfect goyim.
@BummerDrummer i really liked your incel news segments. Will you be doing those in the future? Just asking cause I am a newcel.
>jew worshipping
??????
>5’5
Irrelevant
>Celtic
It would’ve been a better insult to just call me a nigger instead of an Iberian papist
Lol, I'm just stating the truth, now get in before niggers attack your home.
Y
See @curryfool? Maybe light skinned Indians have some whiteness but it still isn't enough for them to be considered white
@your personality @BummerDrummer thanks, this was really informative and makes sense.
Stating the truth with no elaboration because everything you said has been false
The women certainly do, traveller Chad's dick.
Wat you're not Celtic? What varieties they have anyway Celtic, Nordick, Roman, Slav, Greek, Italian, Anglo-Saxon-Goyim, White Jews(The real CHOsen people)?Stating the truth with no elaboration because everything you said has been false
Anglo Teutonic mixed with Neo danubian if you want to get real specific.
D
Yes they have Indo-European or recent European blood.
No shame in just saying that you're one Anglo-saxon-goyim about to fight another civil war, good luck
. Racists are bound to be socialists anyway, no doubt it was national socialism.
Ofc there’s no shame in saying that. Why would there be shame in being the best European race (broad Northern/central European) that did the most for humanity?No shame in just saying that you're one Anglo-saxon-goyim about to fight another civil war, good luck
Whatever, Somalia is shifting to Minneapolis, maybe just buy some Aks and pirate boats from them, you can use them to smuggle some contraband from down south and get rich, just saying
.
First of all the term "White" is very inaccurate. There are dark Sicilians and Greeks who no one would consider "White", yet they still come from "White" countries.
Then again there are light-skinned Turks and Arabs who many if not most people would consider "White", but they come from "non-White" countries.
Jews are often considered "White" because of their high admixture of nordic genes, the Jew Shahak Shapira serving as a good example:
There are in fact several European races, and those that we usually call "White" are the six major races in Europe, first discovered by the author and anthropologist Hans F. K. Günther, who created the foundations of German racial science during the third Reich.
These races were called "nordisch" or "nordic", nowadays also called "nordid" and "Hallstatt", "fälisch" or "phalian", nowadays often called "faelid", "ostbaltisch" or "East Baltic", nowadays also called "East Baltid", "westisch" or "mediterran", these days often called "Gracile Mediterranean", "ostisch" or "alpin", these days called "Alpinid", and finally "dinarisch", these days called "dinaric" or "Dinarid". Below I will post several links with pictures portraying these six races:
the-races-of-the-world.fandom.com
the-races-of-the-world.fandom.com
the-races-of-the-world.fandom.com
the-races-of-the-world.fandom.com
the-races-of-the-world.fandom.com
the-races-of-the-world.fandom.com
These races made up 99% of the population in Europe at the time of the author, and still to this day make up a majority of the European people, although their frequencies and percentages have drastically changed. There have been other races in Europe too, but their percentage was not relevant.
When one talks about "White" people, one usually talks about one of these six races, or a mixture thereof, as pure races are non-existent, and everyone who has blue eyes and blonde hair these days also had several dark-haired and brown-eyed ancestors down-the-line.
Now the question arises: Do Indians have admixture of these European races? To answer this, let's take a look at the average Indians:
It can clearly be seen that none of them truly resemble one of the six major European races. But it is also clearly observable that the so-called "Bollywood"-types are light-skinned and "White"-looking compared to their Indian and South Indian counterparts. Not only is their skin brighter, but even their eye colour, on average, is lighter. A good example is the beautiful Aishwarya Rai, who many Indian men have a crush on, and who many Indian women envy:
It seems to be the case that Indian "Bollywood" actors and actresses are a mixture of several races, some of them European, some of them native to India. This is due to the universal beauty ideal that applies almost everywhere, except for the most primitive tribes, which deems light features and straight noses as attractive.
But why do some Indians obviously have (ancient) European ancestors? This could be explained by ancient Indo-Germanics having been a part of the Indian population at one point. Migrations of the ancient times were wild and far; and it isn't unlikely that a few Germanic tribesmen have settled in India and were replaced by darker races, nowadays making up the core population of the Indian people. Below is a picture that shows the so-called "Indo-European migrations" according to modern scientists. I do not agree with this theory as they are very biased and push a certain agenda, but it shows that people, even back then, had quite an affinity for travelling:
To conclude: Some Indians have ancestors of some of the races we consider "White", and these Indians are overrepresented in Bollywood because of beauty standards. Most Indians, however, do not have any observable European racial characteristics and are therefore considered "non-White".
Then again there are light-skinned Turks and Arabs who many if not most people would consider "White", but they come from "non-White" countries.
Jews are often considered "White" because of their high admixture of nordic genes, the Jew Shahak Shapira serving as a good example:
There are in fact several European races, and those that we usually call "White" are the six major races in Europe, first discovered by the author and anthropologist Hans F. K. Günther, who created the foundations of German racial science during the third Reich.
These races were called "nordisch" or "nordic", nowadays also called "nordid" and "Hallstatt", "fälisch" or "phalian", nowadays often called "faelid", "ostbaltisch" or "East Baltic", nowadays also called "East Baltid", "westisch" or "mediterran", these days often called "Gracile Mediterranean", "ostisch" or "alpin", these days called "Alpinid", and finally "dinarisch", these days called "dinaric" or "Dinarid". Below I will post several links with pictures portraying these six races:
Hallstatt
The Hallstatt type is the Nordid proper. It is the classical Nordid type metrically closest to the Iron Age Nordid skeletal materials from the Hallstatt culture, after which this type is named. Was found in ancient Celts and Germanic peoples, though currently much more common in Germanic groups...
Dalofaelid
Dalofaelid is an unreduced Cromagnid type, a phenotype retaining many traits from Cro-Magnons of the Pleistocene. It is commonly found in Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, and Austria. It can sporadically be found in Western, Central and Eastern Europe. This type is related to Brünn, Borreby...
East Baltid
Gracile Mediterranid
Gracile Mediterranid, often shortened to Gracile Med, is a Mediterranid variety and the most gracile type of Europe. It first appeared among the Natufians, Mesolithic groups of the Levant. Nowadays, it is common in Iberia, Italy, the Mediterranean islands, southern France, southern Greece, and...
West Alpinid
West Alpinid (sometimes Alpine) is a phenotype most commonly found in France, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, Austria, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, and rarely in pure form in the Czech Republic, the Iberian peninsula, the Balkans, Hungary and Slovakia. It is often mixed with other types...
Dinarid
Dinarid is a human phenotype typical for the mountaineous and forested regions of Central Europe. They are often cohabitants of Alpinids. The name derives from the Dinaric Alps in former Yugoslavia, where the type is commonly found among Serbs, Croats, Montenegrins, Bosniaks, and their...
These races made up 99% of the population in Europe at the time of the author, and still to this day make up a majority of the European people, although their frequencies and percentages have drastically changed. There have been other races in Europe too, but their percentage was not relevant.
When one talks about "White" people, one usually talks about one of these six races, or a mixture thereof, as pure races are non-existent, and everyone who has blue eyes and blonde hair these days also had several dark-haired and brown-eyed ancestors down-the-line.
Now the question arises: Do Indians have admixture of these European races? To answer this, let's take a look at the average Indians:
It can clearly be seen that none of them truly resemble one of the six major European races. But it is also clearly observable that the so-called "Bollywood"-types are light-skinned and "White"-looking compared to their Indian and South Indian counterparts. Not only is their skin brighter, but even their eye colour, on average, is lighter. A good example is the beautiful Aishwarya Rai, who many Indian men have a crush on, and who many Indian women envy:
It seems to be the case that Indian "Bollywood" actors and actresses are a mixture of several races, some of them European, some of them native to India. This is due to the universal beauty ideal that applies almost everywhere, except for the most primitive tribes, which deems light features and straight noses as attractive.
But why do some Indians obviously have (ancient) European ancestors? This could be explained by ancient Indo-Germanics having been a part of the Indian population at one point. Migrations of the ancient times were wild and far; and it isn't unlikely that a few Germanic tribesmen have settled in India and were replaced by darker races, nowadays making up the core population of the Indian people. Below is a picture that shows the so-called "Indo-European migrations" according to modern scientists. I do not agree with this theory as they are very biased and push a certain agenda, but it shows that people, even back then, had quite an affinity for travelling:
To conclude: Some Indians have ancestors of some of the races we consider "White", and these Indians are overrepresented in Bollywood because of beauty standards. Most Indians, however, do not have any observable European racial characteristics and are therefore considered "non-White".
Last edited:
@Hyperwristcel thanks, that was a very high iq post. Appreciate it.
No problem bro.
Damn it’s over
No, we don't. The British didn't leave a genetic imprint in South Asia. Thank God.
Do you even know what you are talking about? Aryans weren't white. Some Ancient Iranic groups were described as having gray eyes and red hair. Also, to clarify OP's question, the reason some South Asians have lighter skin or even colored eyes is because they have more Iranic blood in them as opposed to Indic blood.
Last edited:
Technically both Whites and Indians are caucasoid are descendent from Indo Europeans and speak Indo european language. However most Indians have been mixed with the native population while whites mixed with the native populations of europe.
Most purest Indo europeans in India are Brahmins who are very fair skinned. Middle caste people are normal curry types falling in the spectrum and then there are purer dravidians. Curries from Punjab etc are also pretty fair due to asvakan influence etc. and yes the Curry race is divided by caste and not by North or South. There are many people in South India too.
Kerala has more fair skinned people and pecuilar facial features due to high migration of INdo europeans into that place and also mixing with Syrians, arabs and europeans.
Yes. It's due to the Aryan invasion of India.
Similar threads
Blackpill
Darker-skinned men were considered unattractive compared to medium-skinned and light-skinned men
- Lazyandtalentless
- Inceldom Discussion
Undervalued
unionistcel
Users who are viewing this thread
