In the West, the indigenous population birthrate is dropping.
This drop in human population leads to fewer workers, consequently a lower competion which finally translates into higher wages.
These higher wages reduce the firms' profitability and thus the shareholders size of the cake
. The worried shareholder will then sell his shares and buy the stock of a more pofitable company (which lowered its cost of labor by moving to highly populated countries like China).
For the West to compete against the likes of China, they need to be profitable for companies. So, they are required to increase their population in order to increase competition, decrease the wages and lower cost of labor.
Since the whites don't want to make enough babies, the state is forced to import immigrants
I understand the white ressentment against, but your state requires immigration for the country to not collapse under its own wieght. Just like a supernova.
Most of the white countries have established a social security, a retirement system, and other state funded aids. These aids cost a lot, very very lot
The state cannot just watch its tax money decrease because companies departed due to lack of profitability. That would mean chaos and anarchy.
A dropping population cannot dynamize a country's economy, because there isn't enough consumers. Even if a white guy has 1000000 $, he can only eat 20 kinder buenos a day.
Whereas if that 1000000 $ was shared with 10000 deathnics, they will consume 10000 x 20 kinder buenos a day. Thus increasing Kinder turnover.
The state tax would likely rise in the second scenario and funnel the state funded aids.
In an ideal world, the state would like to import as many people as it can and pay them the lowest wage possible
@trying to ascend this is why rich people support leftism imo
This drop in human population leads to fewer workers, consequently a lower competion which finally translates into higher wages.
These higher wages reduce the firms' profitability and thus the shareholders size of the cake
. The worried shareholder will then sell his shares and buy the stock of a more pofitable company (which lowered its cost of labor by moving to highly populated countries like China).For the West to compete against the likes of China, they need to be profitable for companies. So, they are required to increase their population in order to increase competition, decrease the wages and lower cost of labor.
Since the whites don't want to make enough babies
, the state is forced to import immigrants I understand the white ressentment against
, but your state requires immigration for the country to not collapse under its own wieght. Just like a supernova. - Counter argument : But I.N.C.E.L.S. Boss, i am ready to live in poverty if i'll be in a white only country. GET OUT OF MY COUNTRY
The state cannot just watch its tax money decrease because companies departed due to lack of profitability. That would mean chaos and anarchy
.A dropping population cannot dynamize a country's economy, because there isn't enough consumers. Even if a white guy has 1000000 $, he can only eat 20 kinder buenos a day.
Whereas if that 1000000 $ was shared with 10000 deathnics
, they will consume 10000 x 20 kinder buenos a day. Thus increasing Kinder turnover.The state tax would likely rise in the second scenario and funnel the state funded aids.
In an ideal world, the state would like to import as many people as it can
and pay them the lowest wage possible @trying to ascend this is why rich people support leftism imo
Last edited:
