Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious Did dinosaurs really ever exist?

IamLost

IamLost

To Be or Not to Be
★★★
Joined
Oct 6, 2018
Posts
1,738
Dinosaurs never existed in my opinion. The dinosaur theory was invented by jews to replace (((religion))) with (((science))). It's all just an hoax to brainwash the stupid naive goyim. Have you ever noticed how they try to brainwash us since childhood with all this dinsaur propaganda like Jurrasic Park etc.?
To create this new modern degenerate world, you first had to replace religion with science. Only then can one justify all the degenerate filth such as homosexuality, transexuality, feminism, cuckolding, multiculturalism, racemixing etc .. And yes, jews also invented christianity, but they have replaced it with science because christianity has served its purpose and it was no longer needed for the future plans of the jews.

What do you think?

Here is a long video that explains the dinosaur hoax.

 
Invented by jews to replace religion, who also jewish. Tfu on all that. Existence of dinosaurs and evolution doesn not deny enlightened religions
 
I appreciate you questioning what the majority believe, but sometimes i still have to call you an idiot.
 
Dinosaurs never existed in my opinion.
Tenor 6
 
no man
I've never seen a dinosaur. Have you?
By that logic, because you can't confirm the existence of anything you haven't seen yourself, then you should also say that everything and everyone you haven't perceived is de facto nonexistent. You could even take that a step further and deny the existence of anything you're not active perceiving, as after all, can you prove that your memories actually happened?
 
Dinosaur bones are just a bunch of chicken bones glued together.
 
By that logic, because you can't confirm the existence of anything you haven't seen yourself, then you should also say that everything and everyone you haven't perceived is de facto nonexistent. You could even take that a step further and deny the existence of anything you're not active perceiving, as after all, can you prove that your memories actually happened?
I'm just joking bro
I do believe the dinosaurs existed.
 
Wow my post was pure autism then, it's over.
It's fine man
I say dumb shit all the time anyways
But if I'm serious about something and don't mean it as a joke I normally elaborate a bit
 
By that logic, because you can't confirm the existence of anything you haven't seen yourself, then you should also say that everything and everyone you haven't perceived is de facto nonexistent. You could even take that a step further and deny the existence of anything you're not active perceiving, as after all, can you prove that your memories actually happened?
Everything could be in fact nonexistent. Maybe our brains are in a jar and constantly stimulated by a computer.
 
By that logic, because you can't confirm the existence of anything you haven't seen yourself, then you should also say that everything and everyone you haven't perceived is de facto nonexistent. You could even take that a step further and deny the existence of anything you're not active perceiving, as after all, can you prove that your memories actually happened?
This is some heavy shit tbh
 
Schizophrenic religionfags are the the most annoying group of "people" on the internet.
 
I dont know but I hate jews regardless
 
Dinosaur never existed like it is presented today. Tyrannosauros rex for example is actually a title. Tyr like the Germanic god and rex as king. It refers to giant people like Teutobochus Rex who was almost 26 feet tall.
 
My theory is that dinosaurs are not real animals, but "sketches" of the forms that were to eventually end up populating the animal kingdom as we know it.

Hear me out here. My perspective is that everything that exists actually "emanates" from an unchanging, immutable divine source. This emanation descends through various "stages" of reality, each lower than the next from an ontological point of view, until it reaches a state that is subject to mutability which takes the form of what we know as "time". So there is a reality above ours which is like a fluid superstratum where forms exists as "possibilities" which then are given a brief material existence in the physical world which is determined by the "state" of the cycle physical manifestation is at a given point in time, and when it comes to dinosaurs, what we are looking at is physical manifestations of "prototypes" that had a brief existence as physical entities while physical reality was in a formative state, which is during what in the Bible was described as the days of creation. Even the "size" of dinosaurs is misleading, because physical reality wasn't then what it is now, and the same applies to the time frames scientists talk about. This was an age which was still half-way between the "physical" and the subtle, fluid superstratum i mentioned, so that both space and time were not what we think of them today.
 
I don't know what to think about dinosaurs, but I truly believe that God (the Demiurge) created the first cell tbh.
 
My theory is that dinosaurs are not real animals, but "sketches" of the forms that were to eventually end up populating the animal kingdom as we know it.

Hear me out here. My perspective is that everything that exists actually "emanates" from an unchanging, immutable divine source. This emanation descends through various "stages" of reality, each lower than the next from an ontological point of view, until it reaches a state that is subject to mutability which takes the form of what we know as "time". So there is a reality above ours which is like a fluid superstratum where forms exists as "possibilities" which then are given a brief material existence in the physical world which is determined by the "state" of the cycle physical manifestation is at a given point in time, and when it comes to dinosaurs, what we are looking at is physical manifestations of "prototypes" that had a brief existence as physical entities while physical reality was in a formative state, which is during what in the Bible was described as the days of creation. Even the "size" of dinosaurs is misleading, because physical reality wasn't then what it is now, and the same applies to the time frames scientists talk about. This was an age which was still half-way between the "physical" and the subtle, fluid superstratum i mentioned, so that both space and time were not what we think of them today.

What the fuck are you babbling on about?

1. Get help for your schizophrenia
2. Take an evolution course.
 
They existed, but all the dinosaurs you see on TV are mere speculation. No one really knows what they looked like, those are mere artistic representations based on fossil evidence.
 
No br0.
Just more (((lies))).
Eric DuBay is a shady character. But he makes good points.
 
2. Take an evolution course.

Evolution is nonsense. Scientists are autists who have no understanding of metaphysics, they are only good at crunching numbers and coming out with utter idiotic concepts like the idea the universe came out of "nothing", or that "time" somehow can make the miracle of transformism possible (Chesterton made a joke about how a guy who suddenly starded strolling towards the sky is no less miraculous if it took him million of years to do it instead of a few minutes. The impossible doesn't become possible by invoking large numbers, that's Reign of Quantity thinking in a nutshell).

I mean, like, do you even Rene Guenon brah?

Here's a theist ripping an atheist a new one simply because atheism is indefensible from a metaphysical point of view:



And here's the source of my objection towards the theory of evolution:


Metaphysics > science. The reason society is in the current state it is because the metaphysical underpinning of modern civilization is based on an absurdity and the scientific establishment exists to perpetuate the lie:



The above explains stuff like Desmond is amazing and why the establishment hates incels so much, because the concept of the blackpill is based on a realist understanding of the world which is in direct opposition to the nominalist agenda of our elites.
 
Last edited:
The death of dinosaurs was the first successful genocide of incels
 
They were just big birds
 
jews were invented by the jews
 
JFL If you believe in (((Dinosaurs)))
18195033 1328635853840639 1005820677243510513 n
18275184 1329744563729768 3986208903779315303 n


Forbidden
58e12daefdb36b23bd893f918549290a

Blackpills
 
Last edited:
You might be into something, if dinosaurs were so big and strong they should have been the ultimate life form, ain't no shit ass meteor would kill the ultimate life form, I mean the meteor killed all the dinosaurs but the creatures like rats and shit lived? So they could become monkeys and later humans? Yeah right.
 
Nobody says the universe came from nothing

Physicists do. They of course then realize the absurdity of it so they proceed to redefine "nothing" to mean something other than nothing, which puts them in an ever worst position.

a better question to ask yourself is whether there has ever been "nothing" to begin with.

Obviously not, by definition. Nothing cannot exist. That means that the only logical explanation for the existence of contingent reality is to posit a non-contingent source, which must invariably be supernatural by necessity.
 
jfl if you believe in science in 2019
 
They were probably wiped out by angels for their disobedience to God.
 
There is no god and no angels.
 
I am not a paleontologist, but i believe that dinosaurs existed and that the universe doesnt orbit planet Earth.
 
I am not a paleontologist, but i believe that dinosaurs existed and that the universe doesnt orbit planet Earth.
Yes, you believe it, like you believe in god(allah) or fairytales, but you have no real evidence. And no one was talking about: "the universe doesnt orbit planet Earth".
 
They existed, but all the dinosaurs you see on TV are mere speculation. No one really knows what they looked like, those are mere artistic representations based on fossil evidence.
some good common sense at last..
 

Similar threads

O
Replies
13
Views
193
WorthlessSlavicShit
WorthlessSlavicShit
O
Replies
31
Views
915
Quoj
Quoj
Ryo_Hazuki
Replies
31
Views
777
Grunge-Cel
Grunge-Cel
Racial-Identitarian
Replies
5
Views
208
Incel Looks
Incel Looks

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top