I think he did.
I don't think we should be looked at as the attackers or the ones planning to make the big move. Even though the thought of an incel uprising is satisfying, it misconstrues the point that we should be making. Making ourselves look like the aggressors is only going to delve us into some more soy bullshit.
We need to participate in nonviolent activities and acts of protest which make us look recognized. The definition of an incel is someone who can't get some, but once you look into the basic principles of the blackpill, the point we have set is far beyond any normie's surface level reading comprehension. We need to make these people understand that they're the cause of all this bullshit through words and community participation. The issue of lookism at all has never been addressed by any high power in government, and the fact that implicit race bias studies and mainstream issues which target it have existed before issues targeting lookism (which has gone back for thousands of years and coincides directly with neurotypical human behavior, unlike racism, which is a taught behavior formulated several hundred years ago) is beyond me.
Despite lookism being an accredited bias with actual statistics pertaining towards it, it is an overlooked problem in our society constantly being put in the dust by armchair psychologists and any color of dipshit who spouts off just world fallacies without any regard towards any well researched studies at all (my personal opinion on why lookism isn't being studied is so it doesn't deter men from dropping out of society. What I'm trying to say is that there are candy coated psyops being used against us).
Who knows though, I feel like we aren't ever gonna accomplish anything, even though we are judged on the basis of how we look. But we should honestly keep a nonviolent stance, just in case the feds want to get unconstitutional with us.
