P
I’ve been thinking lately on how demographic pressure alters the subjective value of young men and why we seem to have less of an ability to get woman than previous generations. Basically I’m operating on the basic trends of:
-men tend to date same age or younger, thus young women will always have more options than young men.
-how you are treated by women is a direct result of how many viable options she has, ie. she will treat men poorly and say many misandrist statements because it doesn’t alter her prospects much considering if one man takes offense there will always be a replacement.
So why has this not always been the case? I’ve come to the conclusion that it is the combination of this natural predisposition for men to date younger relative to women COMBINED with population decline/stagnation. For example, boomer men were a massive percentage of the population relative to their parents generation, thus the intersex competition based on age was but a drop in the bucket and barely a factor for boomer men while the fathers of the boomers benefited from massive leverage over women by having access to their age as well as a huge cohort of younger women. This disparity I believe resulted in the onset of second wave feminism at this time targeting the source of this disparity being high fertility. With stagnating/declining birth rates there is more intersex competition for men our age because we have to compete with the bloat of past generations without the numbers to absorb it, thus resulting in young women having 1:2 or 1:3 ratios of access allowing them to have:
-the leverage necessary to treat us like shit and still manage to get a partner and fit into polite society.
-higher subjective value resulting in more sympathy and acceptance of their bad behaviors such as cheating, whoring, etc.
-more time to develop career wise, socially, and materially because they do not have to spend the same amount of time focusing on acquiring a partner since one will naturally fall into her lap.
Because of this demographic phenomenon I believe it is in our best interests to support policies/practices that increase are subjective value along these lines. Even if you agree with theses policies as an individual it’s important to think about what is in your/our interests on a macro/systemic scale. Examples include:
-Supporting anything that increases the birth rate.
-actually supporting immigration, most immigrants are young and would bolster our numbers to better absorb the intergenerational intersex competition.
-attempt, or politically support the attempt, to limit women’s access to birth control, abortion, etc. I mean… in the current situation we are devalued to being incels so it’s not as if these tools would help us on an individual basis, however denying it would increase our subjective value of a macro scale by the mechanism listed before.
As I continue to think about this the more I question how much of our current disparity is actually the result of online dating, feminism, or hypergamy and I’ve began to ascribe more of the blame to the material reality forced upon us by demographics.
-men tend to date same age or younger, thus young women will always have more options than young men.
-how you are treated by women is a direct result of how many viable options she has, ie. she will treat men poorly and say many misandrist statements because it doesn’t alter her prospects much considering if one man takes offense there will always be a replacement.
So why has this not always been the case? I’ve come to the conclusion that it is the combination of this natural predisposition for men to date younger relative to women COMBINED with population decline/stagnation. For example, boomer men were a massive percentage of the population relative to their parents generation, thus the intersex competition based on age was but a drop in the bucket and barely a factor for boomer men while the fathers of the boomers benefited from massive leverage over women by having access to their age as well as a huge cohort of younger women. This disparity I believe resulted in the onset of second wave feminism at this time targeting the source of this disparity being high fertility. With stagnating/declining birth rates there is more intersex competition for men our age because we have to compete with the bloat of past generations without the numbers to absorb it, thus resulting in young women having 1:2 or 1:3 ratios of access allowing them to have:
-the leverage necessary to treat us like shit and still manage to get a partner and fit into polite society.
-higher subjective value resulting in more sympathy and acceptance of their bad behaviors such as cheating, whoring, etc.
-more time to develop career wise, socially, and materially because they do not have to spend the same amount of time focusing on acquiring a partner since one will naturally fall into her lap.
Because of this demographic phenomenon I believe it is in our best interests to support policies/practices that increase are subjective value along these lines. Even if you agree with theses policies as an individual it’s important to think about what is in your/our interests on a macro/systemic scale. Examples include:
-Supporting anything that increases the birth rate.
-actually supporting immigration, most immigrants are young and would bolster our numbers to better absorb the intergenerational intersex competition.
-attempt, or politically support the attempt, to limit women’s access to birth control, abortion, etc. I mean… in the current situation we are devalued to being incels so it’s not as if these tools would help us on an individual basis, however denying it would increase our subjective value of a macro scale by the mechanism listed before.
As I continue to think about this the more I question how much of our current disparity is actually the result of online dating, feminism, or hypergamy and I’ve began to ascribe more of the blame to the material reality forced upon us by demographics.
