Serious Datings apps are designed to make you fail

[Deleted member 21219]

Id say a common mistake some cels over here make is determine how unattractive they are based on their success (lack of) on dating apps. I felt the same way until i realized how biased dating apps are.

I conducted the following experiment on tinder in curryland where i live.


1. Created a tinder account of myself.

Waited for a week and got zero matches (and 2 likes)


2. Created a tinder ac using the pic of a foid who was my looksmatch + 2 on the looks scale.

Took around 3 minutes to get 100 likes ( i didnt bother swiping for matches as it was pointless)


3. Created a tinder ac using the pic of a foid who was my looksmatch.

Took around 2 minutes, 45 secs to get 100 likes


4. Created a tinder ac using the pic of a foid who was my looksmatch - 2 on the looks scale.

Took around 3 minutes to get 100 likes


As you can see above, there was little sensitivity to the foids actual looks in how much time it took her to get 100 likes. Just being a foid is enough to get matches on dating apps. This leads to the following conclusions

1. Lack of matches on dating apps only means youre not the top 20%. Doesnt make you incel by default
2. Most men arent attractive enough simply based on looks. You need other attributes such as social circle maxxing.
3. Tinder and other dating apps arent extremely biased against men simply due to biology. Youd be better off trying in real life.

 

[ItsOver4cel]

>Got 2 likes

 

[Deleted member 21219]

>Got 2 likes

The two likes were prolly from ugly curry grannies.

 

[FinnCel]

Tinder is just a way for women to get chad

 

[ihaveno1]

Yup it will always favor the foid no matter what

 

[Spioenkop1]

@Legendarywristcel Have you ever tried in Real Life?
i used tinder first October 2019. Before I just tried real life and it was just a shitshow. In my environment approx 30% of people met via online app, so much for just go real life, bro. In my social circles I hardly meet women, but that is honestly because men and women don’t share similar interests.

 

[radishman]

I mean if you think about it just from dating, not casual sex, the quicker you find a match and get a partner the less you need the app. So they want you to be on as long as possible in order to drain you of your shekels. Problem is if a guy isn't getting anything at all, if he's smart he'll leave. That's why they have bots messaging cucks, especially if it's an app that's behind a paywall.

 

[Deleted member 21219]

@Legendarywristcel Have you ever tried in Real Life?
i used tinder first October 2019. Before I just tried real life and it was just a shitshow. In my environment approx 30% of people met via online app, so much for just go real life, bro. In my social circles I hardly meet women, but that is honestly because men and women don’t share similar interests.

No. Iam too autistic to approach IRL. Also, i dont have a social circle.

 

[Personalityinkwell]

Tinder isn't real life. I'm gonna go to blockbuster

 

[NEETard]

Women get so many matches how do individual chads stand out? A woman could be matched with 20 chads at one time

 

[Ap0calypse]

How do non-sexual traits impact your sexual attractiveness, if by definition your sexual attractiveness is determined by your sexual traits? Socializing with a girl irl won’t impact her brain’s predetermined biological mechanism of judging male sexual attractiveness.

You have no control over what your brain processes to induce a sexual urge response. Why do people think females are superhumans capable of generating sexual urges out of non-sexual things? Female neurological supremacy is rampant in this world, very sad indeed.

 

[Deleted member 17606]

If youre an incel do not even download one of those because the level of ropefuel you will feel as a result will be unmeasureable.

 

[Deleted member 21219]

I mean if you think about it just from dating, not casual sex, the quicker you find a match and get a partner the less you need the app. So they want you to be on as long as possible in order to drain you of your shekels. Problem is if a guy isn't getting anything at all, if he's smart he'll leave. That's why they have bots messaging cucks, especially if it's an app that's behind a paywall.

In any other business, if someone takes your money, gives you hope and then you miserably fail to achieve those results, you'd be suing them in court. But for some reason, these dating apps are allowed to take money from hopeful low value men who get nothing in return.

Iam ok with a dating app analyzing a guys pic (using AI) and simple banning him from participating due to his ugliness.

How do non-sexual traits impact your sexual attractiveness, if by definition your sexual attractiveness is determined by your sexual traits? Socializing with a girl irl won’t impact her brain’s predetermined biological mechanism of judging male sexual attractiveness.

You have no control over what your brain processes to induce a sexual urge response. Why do people think females are superhumans capable of generating sexual urges out of non-sexual things? Female neurological supremacy is rampant in this world, very sad indeed.

Foids attraction to men are based not just on looks. Other traits such as being low inhib, social charisma, intelligence, money or potential to earn money/status all play a role although the single biggest factor would be looks.

 

[radishman]

Iam ok with a dating app analyzing a guys pic (using AI) and simple banning him from participating due to his ugliness.

I think this would be ideal. Just to save everyone wasted time. During the registration process your picture has to be approved before you can even start swiping.

 

[Deleted member 21219]

I think this would be ideal. Just to save everyone wasted time. During the registration process your picture has to be approved before you can even start swiping.

Theyd also make very little money tbh if they implement this. We know foids and chads pay very little on dating apps, if at all. Most of their revenue comes from hopeful low value men.

 

[Deleted member 21514]

Tinder is just a way for women to get chad

 

[radishman]

Theyd also make very little money tbh if they implement this. We know foids and chads pay very little on dating apps, if at all. Most of their revenue comes from hopeful low value men.

True don't think anyone besides uggo men are paying for boosts since they don't need to.

 

[Hate_my_life]

Youd be better off trying in real life.

Are you really pushing this bluepilled nonsense?

Let me guess, I can show off my personality IRL?

 

[Deleted member 21219]

Are you really pushing this bluepilled nonsense?

Let me guess, I can show off my personality IRL?

Your odds of succeeding are higher than on dating apps.

 

[Hate_my_life]

Your odds of succeeding are higher than on dating apps.

Recently a study showed that 62% of women rate only 5% of men as undateable which means of the 20% of top men, only 20% of that make the cut:

Twitter

In both instances studies were done to highlight that the online dating agencies do not differ from the general population:



"Link: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311908.2016.1162414

The money shot:
These findings support previous research in indicating that users of both Tinder™ and Online Dating Agencies do not differ from the general population."










Dating apps are a good indicator of how you'll do in the real world, seeing as it's the most prevalent form in which couples meet:

studies have also shown that 40% of couples met each other Online and that's only going up:

Around 40% of American couples now first meet online

It is one of the most profound changes in life in the US.

www.google.com

Imagine how high it is now!?

No need to speculate, a graph highlighting how popular online dating is was published by Stanford University:

The graph:


Source: https://web.stanford.edu/~mrosenfe/Rosenfeld_et_al_Disintermediating_Friends.pdf

 

[Personalityinkwell]

I used a Chadfish and I did just fine.

If you aren't getting matches, you're ugly, it's that simple

 

[Deleted member 21219]

I used a Chadfish and I did just fine.

If you aren't getting matches, you're ugly, it's that simple

Thats not a very deep analysis, is it?

 

[radishman]

I used a Chadfish and I did just fine.

If you aren't getting matches, you're ugly, it's that simple

It's the easiest test to determine your worth in looks. Although if you've graduated HS without kissing a girl I don't think you're unaware at that point.

 

[Personalityinkwell]

Thats not a very deep analysis, is it?

Deep analysis is cope.

It's the easiest test to determine your worth in looks. Although if you've graduated HS without kissing a girl I don't think you're unaware at that point.

yes that is also true

 

[Deleted member 21219]

Deep analysis is cope.

The bar for male attractiveness is set extremely high. To call every guy who doesnt meet these insane standards as ugly is pretty extreme.

Recently a study showed that 62% of women rate only 5% of men as undateable which means of the 20% of top men, only 20% of that make the cut:

Twitter

In both instances studies were done to highlight that the online dating agencies do not differ from the general population:



"Link: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311908.2016.1162414

The money shot:
These findings support previous research in indicating that users of both Tinder™ and Online Dating Agencies do not differ from the general population."










Dating apps are a good indicator of how you'll do in the real world, seeing as it's the most prevalent form in which couples meet:

studies have also shown that 40% of couples met each other Online and that's only going up:

Around 40% of American couples now first meet online

It is one of the most profound changes in life in the US.

www.google.com

Imagine how high it is now!?

No need to speculate, a graph highlighting how popular online dating is was published by Stanford University:

The graph:


Source: https://web.stanford.edu/~mrosenfe/Rosenfeld_et_al_Disintermediating_Friends.pdf

Ive come across these findings before and still think real life is slightly better than dating apps.

 

[Personalityinkwell]

The bar for male attractiveness is set extremely high. To call every guy who doesnt meet these insane standards as ugly is pretty extreme.

they are ugly in the sense that females don't want to fuck them

But not necessarily ugly in the sense they will be bullied for their looks

 

[sub8male]

Tinder is just a way for women to get chad

Yep

 

[Deleted member 24272]

Tinder is a mistake,ıt shows you picture of your match first and his interests second.

 

[Deleted member 21219]

Tinder is a mistake,ıt shows you picture of your match first and his interests second.

lol.

 

[Transcended Trucel]

Mogs me

 

[The Incel Decade]

1. Lack of matches on dating apps only means youre not the top 20%. Doesnt make you incel by default

Not being top 20% makes you Incel in 2020. Unless you landwhale-max.

 

[AlexanderTheGreat11]

I would have been succesful if i was a Chad

 

[Yerberito]

Thats also is chad only