Blackpill Dating Is Just Prostitution With Extra Steps (The "Dating Model" Is Used For Courtship Because It Provides Plausible Deniability To Both Parties)

[BlkPillPres]

Like the title says, dating is just prostitution with extra steps (especially if you aren't an attractive man).

As a man you are really just paying for the transportation, food, drinks, entertainment, etc to "gamble for pussy", and hope that maybe you get her drunk enough to fuck you.

If there's no alcohol involved, your options are to hope that she's feeling horny enough and gracious enough that night, so she'd throw a pity fuck your way, or give you some "regret sex" and hopefully not #MeeToo you some time after (yeah, good luck with that shit lol).


The reason why the "dating model" is the chosen "model" for heterosexual courtship, is because it allows men to use mental gymnastics via the plausible deniability of "not paying for sex DIRECTLY", and for women it allows them to use mental gymnastics to not feel like whores because they aren't "selling themselves DIRECTLY".

HUMANS PREFER THIS "MODEL" BECAUSE IT NOT ONLY ALLOWS US TO ACT OUT OUR ANIMALISTIC BIOLOGICAL IMPERATIVES, IT ALSO ALLOWS US TO SHIELD OUR EGOS AND MODERN PERCEPTION OF OURSELVES AS "HIGHER BEINGS" (ABOVE MERE ANIMALS).

All scientists had to do to get some male monkeys to start paying the females for sex, was to artificially introduce a "currency" (it was not a planned/expected outcome)

How scientists taught monkeys the concept of money. Not long after, the first prostitute monkey appeared

Seriously, what the heck?

www.zmescience.com

Humans are just doing a "more advanced" form of this basic system of trading resources, which relies on an "understanding" between the sexes that has always existed.

THE AVERAGE MAN DATING TODAY IS A "JOHN", AND HIS DATE (THE AVERAGE WOMAN) IS A "PROSTITUTE"


Dating is just a more convoluted form of prostitution with the added "feature" of men being "rejected", and that little tidbit allows the male to convince himself he's not "necessarily" paying for sex, and it allows the female to convince herself that she's not "necessarily" trading her body for food, drinks, attention, entertainment, etc.

BUT... THAT REALLY IS WHAT BOTH PARTIES ARE DOING IF WE GET DOWN TO BRASS TACKS.

Dating is based on a "model of prostitution", prostitution literally forms the basis of the rules for dating norms (if you take an honest look at dating, that's undeniable).

Dating is literally a man trading his monetary resources for access to a woman's sexual resources. People just like the "plausible deniability" that dating provides (via the possibility of rejection) because it allows us as humans to not have to "think less of ourselves", think of ourselves as "base" or "animalistic".

Were really just playing mind games with ourselves, because we refuse to be self aware and honest about the nature of our existence. That is the greatest fault of this species and it will be the thing that holds us back for many years to come.

 

[Deleted member 35542]

How many years of inceldom is required to achieve revelations such as this?

 

[MarquisDeSade]

As I've said repeatedly, all foids are for hire prostitutes or hookers. There's no such thing as unconditional love, unconditional love is a myth that exists nowhere especially as far as foids are concerned. Instead there are only conditions, demands, prerequisites, and price tags. Romance is nothing more than a way of foids to say, "buy or rent me."

They call that sexual market exchange revolving around purely social capital 'romance' as a way of glamorizing themselves.


The concept of sexual love is all about investment, but more importantly revolves around earning potentials or evaluations that foids completely control anymore. Men are the sexual proletariat as foids are the sexual monopolists or capitalists of reproduction, by this reasoning alone female emancipation along with unregulated sexual hypergamy was a mistake.

We all live under the modern tyranny of the female sexual marketplace dynamic to which men have little to no power over.

 

[BlkPillPres]

As I've said repeatedly, all foids are for hire prostitutes or hookers. There's no such thing as unconditional love, unconditional love is a myth that exists nowhere especially as far as foids are concerned. Instead there are only conditions, demands, prerequisites, and price tags. Romance is nothing more than a way of foids to say, "buy or rent me."

They call that sexual market exchange revolving around purely social capital 'romance' as a way of glamorizing themselves.


The concept of sexual love is all about investment, but more importantly revolves around earning potentials or evaluations that foids completely control anymore. Men are the sexual proletariat as foids are the sexual monopolists or capitalists of reproduction, by this reasoning alone female emancipation along with unregulated sexual hypergamy was a mistake.

We all live under the modern tyranny of the female sexual marketplace dynamic to which men have little to no power over.

I don't think normie realize whats going to happen in the next decade, I won't ever make a thread on that because I don't even want to give them ideas of things to prepare for lol. I'd really like to see a collapse.

 

[MarquisDeSade]

How many years of inceldom is required to achieve revelations such as this?

Once you achieve incel wizard and sorcerer status, entirely new mental or misery levels become unlocked like some video game that only the living damned can play.

I don't think normie realize whats going to happen in the next decade, I won't ever make a thread on that because I don't even want to give them ideas of things to prepare for lol. I'd really like to see a collapse.

The future collapse of the entire world isn't very difficult to conceptualize, it's going to be like the Taliban worldwide and when all is said or done foids will only wish they were in a 'Handmaid's Tale' novel because reality will be much, much worse. That's the future as far as I'm concerned.

 

[BlkPillPres]

How many years of inceldom is required to achieve revelations such as this?

It really just requires a lot of free time to think, and hatred enough to obsess about these things to even recognize these ideas

 

[MarquisDeSade]

It really just requires a lot of free time to think, and hatred enough to obsess about these things to even recognize these ideas

It truly is amazing the level of non-thinking normies do every single day, the great thing about being an incel is you have an unlimited time span to think about everything. You literally have nothing else to do with your time, thinking and pondering the greatest questions of humanity or reality as we know it is all we have. Well, the intellectual incels amongst us anyways.

 

[wei#3959]

How many years of inceldom is required to achieve revelations such as this?

Makes sense though even if you were a normie. I’m sure higher IQ norms realize this

 

[BlkPillPres]

Makes sense though even if you were a normie. I’m sure higher IQ norms realize this

Actually the point of this thread is that normies refuse to admit this to themselves. Again, the reason why the "dating model" is the preferred model of courtship, is because it allows both parties to have plausible deniability when it comes to a system in which they are simulating "prostitution"

Gone are the days of buying a woman form her father or being "gifted" her because he felt you were worthy, now you have to "date" (pay for her indirectly, but now its more like "renting" and she doesn't even have to fuck you lol)

Normies like the self delusion and denial that dating allows them to do

They don't want to admit to their true nature, dating allows us to act on out animal instincts without having to admit to ourselves that were doing this

Any man who really saw dating as prostitution, would not date, they'd just fuck prostitutes

You talk to any normie guy and he will tell you "it's not really the same, its different" (they are falling for the "trick" of the system too)

 

[MarquisDeSade]

Actually the point of this thread is that normies refuse to admit this to themselves. Again, the reason why the "dating model" is the preferred model of courtship, is because it allows both parties to have plausible deniability when it comes to a system in which they are simulating "prostitution"

Gone are the days of buying a woman form her father or being "gifted" her because he felt you were worthy, now you have to "date" (pay for her indirectly, but now its more like "renting" and she doesn't even have to fuck you lol)

Normies like the self delusion and denial that dating allows them to do

They don't want to admit to their true nature, dating allows us to act on out animal instincts without having to admit to ourselves that were doing this

Any man who really saw dating as prostitution, would not date, they'd just fuck prostitutes

You talk to any normie guy and he will tell you "it's not really the same, its different" (they are falling for the "trick" of the system too)

I always get a good chuckle when women anymore complain about being treated like prostitutes or hookers, no bitches, you sell yourselves as such so don't be surprised that you get treated as such by men.

The entire internet dating app scene is hilarious, it's like looking at Backpage where foids sell themselves as glorified escorts with their pictures posted and a profile attached at the bottom. The only difference is that they charge more than your average typical escort and expect men to have more financial collateral upfront to buy their affections. [That is what constitutes as modern dating now.]

Foids practically play themselves.

 

[Neetocel]

@BlkPillPres I agree with you that most modern dating is prostotution. But I disagree with you that men like this model or that they use it to have plausible deniability, they use iy because they have no choice if they wish a romantic relationship. Women love it because they hate having to give GUARANTEES and this is why they shame the shit out of prostitutes and men who use them. And push for hard criminalization methods like the Nordic Model.

 

[BlkPillPres]

But I disagree with you that men like this model or that they use it to have plausible deniability, they use iy because they have no choice if they wish a romantic relationship.

My thread has nothing to do with getting a romantic relationship, the average guy going on a date is hoping he'll "get lucky" afterwards, not have her smile at him and say "lets be a couple" . Dating for men is mostly about getting sex.

Oh and if just 50% of the male population truly wanted prostitution to be legalized (put their voices and their money towards that cause) then it would be legal already, but men haven't pushed for it because they've been raised from birth in a modern culture that shames men that pay for sex

Men do have the option to put such systems in place, but they avoid doing so because most men want to think of themselves as a "real man", not a guy that "pays for it"

Men today are ego obsessed and this is why they prefer the plausible deniability of "dating", because then they don't have to admit to themselves that they are paying for sex

Just look at how most incels speak about paying for sex on this forum and you'll get my point

EVEN MEN WHO WILL NEVER GET A RELATIONSHIP REFUSE TO PAY FOR SEX BECAUSE IT DOESN'T STROKE THEIR EGO

 

[Neetocel]

My thread has nothing to do with getting a romantic relationship, the average guy going on a date is hoping he'll "get lucky" afterwards, not have her smile at him and say "lets be a couple" . Dating for men is mostly about getting sex.

Even then that doesn't mean guys like dating, it is just the process they use because that is the only one available aside from prostitution. Direct prostitution doesnt provide validation. Note please, I am not arguing against your point that dating is indirect prostitution, while I don't believe it is in every case, I think it is in a lot of cases. I am arguing against the notion men like or enjoy the dating process.

Oh and if just 50% of the male population truly wanted prostitution to be legalized (put their voices and their money towards that cause) then it would be legal already, but men haven't pushed for it because they've been raised from birth in a modern culture that shames men that pay for sex

Women are the majority voters, then add the men that indeed are successfully shamed for it. Note that it is not like you just have to vote for it, it would require men actively campaigning for it and while many men might be willing to vote for prostitution, few would be willing to face the shaming and social contempt it would come their way for actively campaigning for it, having to fight feminists organizations and all that stuff without the guarantee of success. This taking in count women are the majority of voters.

Men do have the option to put such systems in place, but they avoid doing so because most men want to think of themselves as a "real man", not a guy that "pays for it"

How can they put it in place when women are the majority of voters?

 

[BlkPillPres]

How can they put it in place when women are the majority of voters?

Women being the majority voters has nothing to do with power, most of the people in high positions of power and influence are men, if men came together to make something happen women's vote wouldn't matter

Imagine if 50% of the male population of the entire planet decided that rape is legal and they are going to go out and rape, would women's "voting power" keep the rates of rape and sexual assault from going up?

Voting power has nothing to do with it, women only have power by proxy, the only power that matters is physical power, laws don't matter if they aren't enforced through threat of physical violence (police, military, etc)

If 50% of all men in the police force and all men in the military decide that they want prostitution to be legal or they wanted rape to be legal, it would just be a civil war, but women would have no say at all

What you are doing is perpetuating this myth of "female power", something I notice a lot of men do

There is ONLY male power, laws don't really exist, ENFORCEMENT exists

Without MEN going around forcefully killing and imprisoning citizens who don't obey the law, the law essentially doesn't exist

ITS ALL MALE POWER

So if literally 50% of all men in a country decided they wanted a law to change, it would change, women would not be able to stop it, votes would not matter, and to top it off most of the people who decide what laws get passed are men to begin with, so if 50% of those guys want the law to change its going to change

 

[Neetocel]

Women being the majority voters has nothing to do with power, most of the people in high positions of power and influence are men, if men came together to make something happen women's vote wouldn't matter

Imagine if 50% of the male population of the entire planet decided that rape is legal and they are going to go out and rape, would women's "voting power" keep the rates of rape and sexual assault from going up?

Voting power has nothing to do with it, women only have power by proxy, the only power that matters is physical power, laws don't matter if they aren't enforced through threat of physical violence (police, military, etc)

If 50% of all men in the police force and all men in the military decide that they want prostitution to be legal or they wanted rape to be legal, it would just be a civil war, but women would have no say at all

What you are doing is perpetuating this myth of "female power", something I notice a lot of men do

There is ONLY male power, laws don't really exist, ENFORCEMENT exists

Without MEN going around forcefully killing and imprisoning citizens who don't obey the law, the law essentially doesn't exist

ITS ALL MALE POWER

So if literally 50% of all men in a country decided they wanted a law to change, it would change, women would not be able to stop it, votes would not matter, and to top it off most of the people who decide what laws get passed are men to begin with, so if 50% of those guys want the law to change its going to change

You forget that men will backstab and fuck themselves over to gain power and advantadges. Women being the majority matters because those men in high position of power and influence will want to use those votes. If the men in those positions of power refuse to outlaw prostitution, then rivals willing to overthrow those men will do so if it means they are getting those votes.

 

[ezio6]

Blackest pill