E
In the study Why do people disparage May–December romances? Condemnation of age-discrepant romantic relationships as strategic moralization, it took a survey of 211 women and 190 men in the United States and asked them their opinions on age gap relationships, specifically ones where the man is older than the woman. The study reveals that younger American people condemn man-older age gap couples more than older American people do, regardless of sex/gender. Which means younger American people are harsher critics of man-older age-gap couples than older American people, regardless of sex/gender. Many people might be confused by this because younger people are more accepting of homosexuality, gay marriage and interracial marriage. But this doesn't confuse/surprise me at all. In the early-mid 20th century, age gap relationships were more common and more accepted while homosexuality and interracial relationships were less accepted. Age gaps didn't really get stigmatized or become rare until the late 20th century (1970s-1990s). YouGov also asked British adults about age gap relationships in 2011. The difference between younger people and older people's perception of age gaps in the UK is a bit different than in the united states.
Research has shown that age gap marriages are more likely to end in divorce and that the larger the age gap, the higher the odds of divorce are. HOWEVER, research has shown that it's actually the strong stigma against age gaps that causes divorce or break-ups, not the inherent nature of the age gap. According to research, age gap couples are only more likely to break up if they experience disapproval from friends, family or society in general. When they aren't exposed to this disapproval and their relationship is accepted by friends and family, they are less likely to break up and actually will have more relationship satisfaction and commitment. Research has also shown that man-older age gap couples have more satisfaction, less jealousy, less cheating, etc. than age-similar relationships. As a result, the idea that age gaps are harmful is a myth and instead it is obvious that man-older age gaps have benefits and are healthy because it conforms to the evolutionary perspective of man-older age gaps. Many believe this myth that women who date much older men have daddy issues, but research has found no evidence of this being true. As a result, the idea that women who date much older men have daddy issues is actually a myth.
Many feminazis and soyboy cucks try arguing that 18/19 year olds are still children because "brain doesn't finish developing until 25
" but the teenage brain is actually a myth, and a man named Robert Epstein (has NOTHING to do with jeffrey epstein) has written a lot about this. He writes that the teen brain isn't what causes teen turmoil, and that teen turmoil actually is what causes the teen brain. He says teen turmoil isn't intrinsic in teens, and that society's infantilization of teenagers is what really makes teens immature and engage in risky behavior. Laws restricting adult rights for teenagers didn't exist until the 19th century, and got more extreme in the 20th century (particularly the late 20th century). Researchers found that in preindustrial societies, teenagers were more mature and didn't show any signs of immaturity or recklessness, and that infantilizing teenagers actually causes immaturity and psychopathology in teenagers. In the early 1900s, many white 16 year olds are working instead of at school, and the vast majority of them began to be in school in the 1940s.
I've also seen foids on twitter whine about how "traumatized" they are from dating a man in his mid-late 20s when they were 18/19. But the reason they're "traumatized" is only because of society's strong disapproval of their age difference, it isn't the age difference itself that causes the trauma. Society teaches them that these men are evil predators and they're victims of abuse, which is what really caused the trauma. In the early 20th century, it was pretty common for young women to date a guy older than them. They weren't traumatized back then, and these marriages lasted. If this stigma didn't exist, they wouldn't be traumatized. I'm sure in the 1950s, white foids who dated black guys would later whine about being traumatized from dating black guys due to the stigma against interracial marriage back then. (In 1958, only 4% of Americans approved of a black person marrying a white person. The percentage is now at 87% as of 2013.)
Most guys would prolly be ok with dating a younger women if society approved of it. When interracial marriage became more accepted, interracial marriage also became more common. As homosexuality became more accepted, the amount of homos coming outta the closet skyrocketed.
If you're in your mid-late 20s (or even your 40s), go ahead and date an 18-23 year old. Nothing wrong with it. It's legal and completely ok. Below that is illegal in many states. Some states have the AOC at 18. If 18 year olds are old enough for war, they can fuck or date an older person or drink alcohol. full stop.
@Mainländer @Robtical @FidelCashflow @nazianime @RREEEEEEEEE @Personalityinkwell @Diocel @zangano1 @ordinaryotaku @nxdismycope @goydivision @FinnCel @Barnacle @Transcended Trucel @MountainGorilla @ThoughtfulCel @Dionysus @ionlycopenow @Ropemaxx @truthpill @Sparrow's Song @MuslimCell
Research has shown that age gap marriages are more likely to end in divorce and that the larger the age gap, the higher the odds of divorce are. HOWEVER, research has shown that it's actually the strong stigma against age gaps that causes divorce or break-ups, not the inherent nature of the age gap. According to research, age gap couples are only more likely to break up if they experience disapproval from friends, family or society in general. When they aren't exposed to this disapproval and their relationship is accepted by friends and family, they are less likely to break up and actually will have more relationship satisfaction and commitment. Research has also shown that man-older age gap couples have more satisfaction, less jealousy, less cheating, etc. than age-similar relationships. As a result, the idea that age gaps are harmful is a myth and instead it is obvious that man-older age gaps have benefits and are healthy because it conforms to the evolutionary perspective of man-older age gaps. Many believe this myth that women who date much older men have daddy issues, but research has found no evidence of this being true. As a result, the idea that women who date much older men have daddy issues is actually a myth.
Many feminazis and soyboy cucks try arguing that 18/19 year olds are still children because "brain doesn't finish developing until 25
" but the teenage brain is actually a myth, and a man named Robert Epstein (has NOTHING to do with jeffrey epstein) has written a lot about this. He writes that the teen brain isn't what causes teen turmoil, and that teen turmoil actually is what causes the teen brain. He says teen turmoil isn't intrinsic in teens, and that society's infantilization of teenagers is what really makes teens immature and engage in risky behavior. Laws restricting adult rights for teenagers didn't exist until the 19th century, and got more extreme in the 20th century (particularly the late 20th century). Researchers found that in preindustrial societies, teenagers were more mature and didn't show any signs of immaturity or recklessness, and that infantilizing teenagers actually causes immaturity and psychopathology in teenagers. In the early 1900s, many white 16 year olds are working instead of at school, and the vast majority of them began to be in school in the 1940s.I've also seen foids on twitter whine about how "traumatized" they are from dating a man in his mid-late 20s when they were 18/19. But the reason they're "traumatized" is only because of society's strong disapproval of their age difference, it isn't the age difference itself that causes the trauma. Society teaches them that these men are evil predators and they're victims of abuse, which is what really caused the trauma. In the early 20th century, it was pretty common for young women to date a guy older than them. They weren't traumatized back then, and these marriages lasted. If this stigma didn't exist, they wouldn't be traumatized. I'm sure in the 1950s, white foids who dated black guys would later whine about being traumatized from dating black guys due to the stigma against interracial marriage back then. (In 1958, only 4% of Americans approved of a black person marrying a white person. The percentage is now at 87% as of 2013.)
Most guys would prolly be ok with dating a younger women if society approved of it. When interracial marriage became more accepted, interracial marriage also became more common. As homosexuality became more accepted, the amount of homos coming outta the closet skyrocketed.
If you're in your mid-late 20s (or even your 40s), go ahead and date an 18-23 year old. Nothing wrong with it. It's legal and completely ok. Below that is illegal in many states. Some states have the AOC at 18. If 18 year olds are old enough for war, they can fuck or date an older person or drink alcohol. full stop.
@Mainländer @Robtical @FidelCashflow @nazianime @RREEEEEEEEE @Personalityinkwell @Diocel @zangano1 @ordinaryotaku @nxdismycope @goydivision @FinnCel @Barnacle @Transcended Trucel @MountainGorilla @ThoughtfulCel @Dionysus @ionlycopenow @Ropemaxx @truthpill @Sparrow's Song @MuslimCell
Last edited:
