Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill Darwin Blackpilled (More Pu$$y = Less for You)

  • Thread starter Deleted member 35171
  • Start date
Deleted member 35171

Deleted member 35171

Mother Nature's Failed Experiment
-
Joined
Jun 16, 2021
Posts
3,317
What is sexual selection?
[UWSL]Sexual selection is natural selection as a result of preference by one sex for a certain trait in the opposite sex. [/UWSL]

Example 1: The antlers of a stag. Stags use thier antlers for strength contests. Longer and stronger antlers increase prowess in competition with members of the same sex allowing them to secure more females.

Example 2: The long extravagant tails of peacocks. A feature that is harmful to the individual's own survival making it more likely to attract predators. However it signals to the female that there must be other compensatory traits (e.g. superior strength, intelligence) allowing the male to survive to the age of mating. The female perceives this as attractiveness (good genes.)

What was Darwin's theory of sexual selection?
Darwin had theorized in populations with high male to female ratio, high competition for mating between males would drive sexual selection. He had hypothesized in a situation with excess males and a shortage of females, the males with less desirable traits would have worse chances of mating and thus sexual selection would intensity.

What do new studies show?
New studies reveal sexual selection is more pronounced when there is a high female to male ratio. This is because sexual selection is a system in which winner takes all no matter the number of male competitors. Therefore the more females in a population, the more potential partners the top male(s) has access to.

Conclusion:
Chad fucks all. The less male competition he faces the more easily he can pass on his superior genes to as many females as possible who will all willingly share him.

Link to the article: https://theconversation.com/darwin-got-sexual-selection-backwards-research-suggests-162711
 
Last edited:
Conclusion:
Chad fucks all. The less male competition he faces the more easily he can pass on his superior genes to as many females as possible who will all willingly share him.
Cover10
 
Conclusion:
Chad fucks all. The less male competition he faces the more easily he can pass on his superior genes to as many females as possible who will all willingly share him.
Hold on.. You mean to tell me that less male competition means more chances for sex?

Revolutionary..

20200219 171045
 
The antlers of a stag. Stags use thier antlers for strength contests. Longer and stronger antlers increase prowess in competition with members of the same sex allowing them to secure more females.
You mean like the beetles?
 
New studies reveal sexual selection is more pronounced when there is a high female to male ratio. This is because sexual selection is a system in which winner takes all no matter the number of male competitors. Therefore the more females in a population, the more potential partners the top male(s) has access to.
This is the brutal black pill. OP's conclusion doesn't catch it.

The article is saying that even if males are significantly outnumbered by foids, the Chads will still monopolize all the foids.

Another world war would not help us. Mass producing foids and aborting males would not help future incels. It's truly over.
 
The dude contradicted what he wrote throughout the whole post at the end JFL.
Over for proof reading cels
Yeah, I was writing for so long I just wanted to get it over with.

I guess the real conclusion is in the title: more women only means more for chad; more women doesn't increase the odds for sub-chads. In fact it decreases it, because more women -> high female to male ratio -> low male to female ratio -> less potential competition for chad
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

AsiaCel
Replies
7
Views
392
1nsomniak
1nsomniak
Logic55
Replies
2
Views
288
Vilsonicvs
Vilsonicvs
sultryloser
Replies
49
Views
2K
XDFLAMEBOY
XDFLAMEBOY

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top