Soy DARVO

[Lazyandtalentless]

DARVO - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

DARVO is a tactic used by a perpetrator to avoid accountability for their actions. As the acronym suggests, DARVO commonly involves these steps:

1. The perpetrator denies the harm or abuse ever took place.
2. When confronted with evidence, the perpetrator then attacks the person that they had harmed, or are still harming. The attacker may also attack the victim's family and/or friends.
3. Finally, the perpetrator claims that they were or are actually the victim in the situation, thus reversing the positions of victim and offender.[2][4] It often involves not just playing the victim but also victim blaming.[3]

Here’s how it works:

1. Deny – “That’s not true! You’re just making things up!”
   • No matter how much evidence you have, they flat-out refuse to acknowledge reality. Gaslighting at its finest.
2. Attack – “You’re bitter/incel/insecure for even bringing this up!”
   • Instead of engaging with the argument, they go straight for character assassination. If they can make you the problem, they don’t have to address the actual issue.
3. Reverse Victim & Offender – “Ugh, incels are always refusing help! I’m just trying to help by telling them to off themselves!”
   • Suddenly, they’re the real victim. You pointing out their hypocrisy or falsehoods makes them feel "unsafe," while you, the actual victim of their manipulation, are now framed as the aggressor.

 

[DarkStar]

I've seen this dialectic utilized many times, including when debating mainstream, anti-white globohomo "leftists" online.

 

[Lazyandtalentless]

Deny – “That’s not true! You’re just making things up!”

• No matter how much evidence you have, they flat-out refuse to acknowledge reality. Gaslighting at its finest.

What evidence inkwell!

The evidence:

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Regression-of-percent-of-female-visits-on-male-income_tbl1_276318796

Ong and Wang's research paper, "Income attraction: An online dating field experiment," investigates gender differences in preferences for a partner's income before interaction. Using a large Chinese online dating website, the researchers created artificial profiles with randomly assigned income levels and tracked the number of visits each profile received. The study found that men visited female profiles regardless of income, while women showed a strong preference for male profiles with higher incomes, especially those earning more than themselves. This "income attraction" could explain marriage and spousal income patterns, highlighting the importance of income as a factor in mate selection, particularly for women.

https://www.columbia.edu/~rmk7/HC/HC_Readings/Hughes.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Hughes, Dispenza, and Gallup's 2004 study explored connections between voice attractiveness, body morphology (shoulder-to-hip ratio (SHR) in men and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) in women), and sexual behavior. They found that more attractive male voices correlated with larger SHRs, while more attractive female voices correlated with smaller WHRs. Furthermore, for both sexes, voice attractiveness was linked to earlier sexual debut, more sexual partners, and a higher number of extra-pair copulation (EPC) partners. In terms of morphology, a larger SHR in men was associated with earlier sexual activity and more partners, whereas a smaller WHR in women was linked to later sexual debut and fewer partners, suggesting that voice attractiveness may signal fitness and reproductive potential.

https://www.gertstulp.com/pdf/Stulp%20et%20al%202013_PAID_Women%20want%20taller%20men%20more%20than%20men%20want%20shorter%20women.pdf

1. Partner Height Preferences:

• Male-Taller Norm: Both men and women preferred the man to be taller than the woman in a relationship. Women, on average, preferred a larger height difference between themselves and their partner than men did.
• Acceptable Height Range: Men were more accepting of a wider range of partner heights than women were. Women were more selective in their height preferences.
• Tolerance: Women were more tolerant of men being taller than their ideal height, while men were more tolerant of women being shorter than their ideal height.

2. Satisfaction with Own Height:

• Curvilinear Relationship: Satisfaction with height was related to actual height in a curvilinear fashion for both sexes.
• Men: Satisfaction with height increased until average height was reached, after which satisfaction remained constant with increasing height
• Women: Women of average height and slightly above average height were most satisfied with their height.
• Height Importance: Height was more important for men's satisfaction with their own height than it was for women.

3. Satisfaction with Partner Height:

• The study also investigates the influence of partner height on satisfaction with one's own height. Women were most satisfied when their partner was 21 cm taller, whereas men were most satisfied when they were 8 cm taller than their partner.

In Conclusion:


The study confirms that height plays a significant role in mate preferences and satisfaction. Women are generally more selective about height than men, and satisfaction with one's own height is influenced by societal preferences and the height of one's partner.

https://homepages.uc.edu/~martinj/Taste%20Food%20%26%20Wine/Aesthetics_of_Food_%26_Drink/Rhodes%20-%20Facial%20symmetry%20and%20the%20perception%20of%20beauty.pdf?utm_source

Main Points:

• The study investigates the relationship between facial symmetry and attractiveness, exploring whether preferences for symmetry are biologically based.
• The researchers manipulated the symmetry of faces and examined the correlation between natural variations in symmetry and perceived attractiveness.

Key Findings:

• Increased symmetry in faces led to increased attractiveness, while decreased symmetry reduced attractiveness.
• Natural variations in symmetry correlated significantly with attractiveness.
• Perfectly symmetrical faces (created by blending normal and mirror images) were preferred over less symmetrical versions.
• Facial symmetry appears to influence human mate choice.
• Subjects were able to detect subtle differences in facial symmetry.

Experiment 1 Highlights:

• Participants rated faces with varying levels of symmetry (low, normal, high, and perfect) for attractiveness and as potential life partners.
• Both male and female faces with perfect symmetry were rated as more attractive than those with normal or low symmetry.
• Subjects were sensitive to differences in symmetry levels.

In essence, the study suggests that facial symmetry is an attractive quality, possibly due to biological factors related to mate selection.The researchers discuss how this preference might be linked to symmetry being a signal of health and genetic quality. They also address conflicting results in previous studies, suggesting that perfect symmetry might be preferred as long as it doesn't introduce structural abnormalities in the face.

 

[FumoCum]

Theres no point bro, even if you gather all the fucking evidence in the world people are still going to be fucking shit.

They have NOTHING to gain by admitting that we were done dirty by life and that they are keeping this cycle of hate toward us. They prove us right by being insensitive, faking not understanding and looking down upon us and tell everyone to do so.