yez
cursed with inceldom
-
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2021
- Posts
- 7,990
"Noble death", "honour", "warrior" - such meaningless concepts now. Imagine sacrificing yourself for a woman of the modern day! What honour is there in that?
Sounds rather toxic to expect men to lay their lives down for females. It isn't like men have to do all of the hard work in society already, yet we are still expected to be selfless and just... DIE to protect muh lady. Women will never want to change this, EVER, as this solely benefits them. But we are supposedly equals .
I wonder how long she'll wait before jumping onto the CC.
Extremely dumb she’s probably forgotten about him while he is 6 feet underShe just woke Chad up with a morning blowjob.
Family might be one thing, but dying for some random girlfriend is beyond retarded.
Extremely dumb she’s probably forgotten about him while he is 6 feet under
good riddance. I wanna watch it live.di*d
she forgot about him.Extremely dumb she’s probably forgotten about him while he is 6 feet under
What meaning was there in bygone days then?"Noble death", "honour", "warrior" - such meaningless concepts now. Imagine sacrificing yourself for a woman of the modern day! What honour is there in that?
She already found another bf I bet.She's fucking other guys
Maybe for chad or gigachad.Why "empathetic gender" is not doing the same for men?
Ah okI was mainly alluding to the YouTube comments on that video, which all used those words to describe the fallen man.
Soyciety is indeed heading toward Gehenna faster than my mental state. Life becoming a walk in the park has likely contributed thereto. Most religious (Christian) principles are still intact in Western morality. Besides, even in the heyday of Christianity I doubt most clergymen were overly devout. Indulgences nicely exemplify my point. I also have my doubts that procreation was ever necessary. Please do enlighten meSurvival and family appeared to be things that people were more concerned about in days gone. People subscribed to traditional roles, with the male the spear and shield of the household. The lines and roles between the sexes today have been blurred beyond repair, to where I can no longer view women as these defenceless creatures that are worthy of protection; they can do everything themselves, as they often hark on about. Certain structures have been eroded (perhaps religious principles, survival and the need to reproduce).
She's fucking other guys
Now his soul would see his whorefriend getting banged by chads and niggers
Extremely based. Nothing else needs to be said about this."Noble death", "honour", "warrior" - such meaningless concepts now. Imagine sacrificing yourself for a woman of the modern day! What honour is there in that?
Sounds rather toxic to expect men to lay their lives down for females. It isn't like men have to do all of the hard work in society already, yet we are still expected to be selfless and just... DIE to protect muh lady. Women will never want to change this, EVER, as this solely benefits them. But we are supposedly equals .
I wonder how long she'll wait before jumping onto the CC...
Au contraire, please do speak your mind. You seem to be one of the few users who airs interesting opinions. If I thought you a retard, I wouldn't inquire as to your opinions.I am not informed enough to give a solid response - perhaps I should, for future reference, hold my tongue and not assume things about days long gone...
So you're saying that children were necessary to help pay the bills which they themselves heightened?It's merely an assumption on my part, that people were more concerned about procreation in the past - though I guess it depends on how far back we are going. I talk mainly about the Victorian times and prior, where women were giving birth to numerous amounts of children - the high mortality rate meant that many of those infants would perish before puberty. Procreation back then seemed to have some form of utility, to provide a family workforce - the family unit was (I infer) united, as opposed to today where things are a little more individualistic if you live in an urban area (perhaps the strong family unit still resides in more rural areas). And, of course, the man would toil in the factory or his trade, the main breadwinner.
Gf sucking real gigachad off tinder right now
Extremely dumb she’s probably forgotten about him while he is 6 feet under
Not much else they could've done anyway.If I am correct, it was less to pay the bills (less mouths to feed would be the best way to reduce the bills, of course) but mainly to combat the high mortality rate; lack of contraception and sex-ed were also factors. Birth 7-8 kids, hopefully 2 or 3 will make it to adulthood. A shotgun method; seemed to be effective.
Not like I can talk some sense into them or subjugate them to my eminently superior rule, so leaving them to their own devices is pretty much the only sensible course of action. One of the things that saddens me most, however, is that their shriveled eggs will birth genetically defective babycels who will have to suffer like we do once they grow up.Nowadays, women are bolstered in their defiance to focus on child-rearing - not until they are in their wedding cake years, close to no eggs left! Say anything about it and the hordes of women irl and online will not hold their tongues about the dreaded patriarchy. Best to leave them to their own devices, I say.
I imagine the intent behind this was to make sure the church would keep going strong as opposed to a sincere care for God's directive.I did not know about this, and that sounds rather comical! Would I be in favour of bringing such a thing back? I am not sure - I would prefer a more holistic approach to procreation.
They do it to themselves, so I agree.Childless women aren't necessarily referred to as spinsters nowadays, but I do revel in the fact that they have to look at their friends who have created families and live fulfilling lives, meanwhile the childless women are left with just their career and an empty home. They do not pity us, so I cannot help but take some form of pleasure.
Society, humans, nor life is intrinsically moral or fair. Looking at things from that perspective will eat you up inside. Equality and morality are tools people in power use to make life better for themselves and discard when it is not necessary for them."Noble death", "honour", "warrior" - such meaningless concepts now. Imagine sacrificing yourself for a woman of the modern day! What honour is there in that?
Sounds rather toxic to expect men to lay their lives down for females. It isn't like men have to do all of the hard work in society already, yet we are still expected to be selfless and just... DIE to protect muh lady. Women will never want to change this, EVER, as this solely benefits them. But we are supposedly equals .
I wonder how long she'll wait before jumping onto the CC...