![To koniec](/data/avatars/m/25/25713.jpg?1719602062)
To koniec
Goyim
★★★★★
- Joined
- Apr 14, 2020
- Posts
- 9,080
As a polish man once said: “to koniec”
too many ideas and reasoning, it was written by a man, probably a trannnie.
Some men are just destined to not breed, and society has a natural bias towards females. The example the poster uses is war, like Ukraine at the moment. Men are dying at the frontlines and they're all but statistics, they die every day, but when a female is caught in the crossfire it breaks international headlines. Pure blackpillTLDR?
Almost certainly, the mention of "men wanting to be us" is a dead giveaway loltoo many ideas and reasoning, it was written by a man, probably a trannnie.
You mean a society where men's brains are rewired to not seek mates to reproduce or they are chained against their will so that they can't cause any kind of revolt?The scenario in which women are living in the Garden of Eden and get to hand pick which men get to reproduce only exists in the terminal stages of highly complex societies, which have become prosperous enough to forget why their ancestors enforced monogamy to begin with.
This. If our society were really this pragmatic, they'd find almost all the foids who have already reproduced absolutely worthless. Foids live longer and drain more valuable resources.Second part is partially true, yes mostly everyone care for women and children only. But its not the natural thing, its sociological because thats what society teach us since birth. Go back in time and people didnt value children's and especially foids lives at all. They werent even counting their daughters jfl, if a guy had 10 daughters and 0 sons he was considered childless.
High IQ and evolutionary sociologypilled.There's a reason women only speak of such blackpills among other women. If they were to openly say it to men, not only would it inspire an immediate backlash for men to know what they are really worth to society, but it might drive them to actually act as their ancestors did and do everything in their power to support an enforced monogamy patriarchy over a polygamous matriarchy.
And the foid who wrote that post must think she is so clever for realizing this. In part she's right, but at the same time too retarded to connect the dots. Yes a tribe that consists of 30 men and 5 women is superior to one of 5 men and 30 women... assuming they are isolated on an island. If not, the former would be begging to be invaded by the latter.
And in the long-term, a society which guarantees each man a loyal wife to bear his children in exchange for lawfulness and productivity will ALWAYS prevail over those for which men are constantly at odds in securing their genetic legacy. And when the latter occurs, sexual selection by foids is not the main element in deciding who reproduces, rather it's the men themselves who compete in claiming women by force. Usually by banding together to invade another tribe, because organized groups always beat unorganized ones.
However once again, monogamous patriarchical societies are more cohesive and technologically advanced which makes them better able to defend against such an invasion. Even if some of the men die in war, they are not worthless because they protected the women who bear their children and the people who will give their children a future. Whereas a society in which the majority of men are uncertain of their genetic legacy will have little reason to even defend against an invasion of their tribe.
The scenario in which women are living in the Garden of Eden and get to hand pick which men get to reproduce only exists in the terminal stages of highly complex societies, which have become prosperous enough to forget why their ancestors enforced monogamy to begin with.
isn't it kinda the current normYou mean a society where men's brains are rewired to not seek mates to reproduce or they are chained against their will so that they can't cause any kind of revolt?
Agree with you here.First part is bullshit, if the foids reproduced with the guys like Tesla, we would already have infinite free wireless energy. But no, they reproduced with aggressive big braindead assholes. Because their primitive mind still think that we live in bronze ages where size, aggressiveness and NTness will be useful to form bandit groups and pillage farmers.
Second part is partially true, yes mostly everyone care for women and children only. But its not the natural thing, its sociological because thats what society teach us since birth. Go back in time and people didnt value children's and especially foids lives at all. They werent even counting their daughters jfl, if a guy had 10 daughters and 0 sons he was considered childless.