Experiment Could socially prescribed nudism or a ban on wearing clothes when the temperature allows it make a difference?

[just another koala]

There is the idea of the ultimate chads from the gym who have the ultimate attraction. However, if you look at interviews with bodybuilders, you come to the conclusion that most of fake bodybuilders only train their upper body to show off. Real bodybuilders are very upset about this. Many of these fake chads usually have legs the size of matchsticks because training them is very difficult and requires a lot of endurance. There are many very large muscles in the legs compared to the upper body. In addition, an ugly face or a small height does not necessarily mean having a small penis. The form of the torment does not necessarily have to be related to this either. By that I mean the state of health, for example the absence of warts and things like that. An otherwise inconspicuous man, even if he doesn't have an attractive face, could be superior to a Chad with a healthier and larger looking penis. It would also contribute to a kind of disillusionment that bodies are rarely perfect and the image given to women by the media that the world is all Chads could be overturned.

However, anyone who works physically hard, stands and runs a lot at work automatically has good leg training. Many men who have never been to the gym have thick upper arms. Because they work a lot. This could set incels apart from the nomie junk that only lives in the office. Thats how it is for me at least. I've never played sports. However, I am very muscular due to my hard work. At least significantly stronger than the average man. Women could see this much better if everyone were forced to be naked.

 

[OutcompetedByRoomba]

Getting people more comfortable with their own bodies / sexuality early in their lifes prob reduces the amount of incels by lowering the number of people with high inhibitions. But it also means torturing smaal dicked men, people with some ugly skin abnormality, fat people, torturing me by forcing me to see fat people naked, the list goes on.

 

[just another koala]

Getting people more comfortable with their own bodies / sexuality early in their lifes prob reduces the amount of incels by lowering the number of people with high inhibitions. But it also means torturing smaal dicked men, people with some ugly skin abnormality, fat people, torturing me by forcing me to see fat people naked, the list goes on.

But it could also be that viewers' inhibitions about what is considered "ugly" are reduced when people see that reality is different than what Holywood would like to suggest to us. It could be that obesity is assessed completely differently. That a beer belly, for example, does not mean that a person is completely obese. It could also be that a certain degree of "thinness" is considered anorexia, which was previously considered the ideal. Simply because you see that people look completely different than they do on television. Without scams like Push-up-bras and clothing that hides body fat, the view of what is normal will shift.

 

[OutcompetedByRoomba]

But it could also be that viewers' inhibitions about what is considered "ugly" are reduced when people see that reality is different than what Holywood would like to suggest to us.

Not really. You think seeing some old foid's crumbled up flaps or some old boomers wrinkly ball sack is gonna stop being disgusting after the XXth time?

Mabye it will not be as bad after a while, but that will also depend on how strong your innate / initial disgust reaction is. I have no strong feelings either way. It might be an improvement, it might not, it probably would be for some but not for others. In the end, I predict it would not have a big enough impact to meaningfully contribute to saving us from our misery.

It's an interesting Idea though, anyways.

 

[just another koala]

Not really. You think seeing some old foid's crumbled up flaps or some old boomers wrinkly ball sack is gonna stop being disgusting after the XXth time?

Mabye it will not be as bad after a while, but that will also depend on how strong your innate / initial disgust reaction is. I have no strong feelings either way. It might be an improvement, it might not, it probably would be for some but not for others. In the end, I predict it would not have a big enough impact to meaningfully contribute to saving us from our misery.

It's an interesting Idea though, anyways.

Maybe it will be like that at the beginning. But over time the view will change significantly. We certainly have it for particularly overweight people, for example. But it will be just as hard for Foids who have no push-up bras and almost no tits and for Chads who have beautiful faces but only small penises or look completely shapeless naked. But after a while the superficiality disappears from people's minds. Everyone looks for people who match their preferences. You no longer follow an illusion because no one has the opportunity to create an illusion anymore.

 

[OutcompetedByRoomba]

Maybe it will be like that at the beginning. But over time the view will change significantly. We certainly have it for particularly overweight people, for example. But it will be just as hard for Foids who have no push-up bras and almost no tits and for Chads who have beautiful faces but only small penises or look completely shapeless naked. But after a while the superficiality disappears from people's minds. Everyone looks for people who match their preferences. You no longer follow an illusion because no one has the opportunity to create an illusion anymore.

The baseline for physical attraction is rooted in biology and not socialisation or hollywood propaganda or w/e else. There is a hard limit to how malleable people's preferances and perceptions are.

And while you focus on small dicked chads for some reason there will be countless people who could find a partner, if they are allowed to hide their body's weaknesses on their first meetings, who will be absolutely humiliated and isolated by what you propose. Relationships that come to be because the burden of having to accept the worst parts of each others body is not put on your partner right at the start.

Small-dicked men will probably stay at home every time a no-clothes-rule is in effect. And big dicked chads will be even more obvious to spot, so they will monopolize women even more.

Superficiality is part of human nature because looks used to send hard to fake signals about your genetic quality. Foids will still have it just as easy, there are enough men who would happily go for a flat-chested girl, every subtype of women has male admirers. It will be men who will be hit hardest. Women want to show off what they got, and they do so at every opportunity, because they know there will always be buyers for it.

 

[just another koala]

The baseline for physical attraction is rooted in biology and not socialisation or hollywood propaganda or w/e else. There is a hard limit to how malleable people's preferances and perceptions are.

And while you focus on small dicked chads for some reason there will be countless people who could find a partner, if they are allowed to hide their body's weaknesses on their first meetings, who will be absolutely humiliated and isolated by what you propose. Relationships that come to be because the burden of having to accept the worst parts of each others body is not put on your partner right at the start.

Small-dicked men will probably stay at home every time a no-clothes-rule is in effect. And big dicked chads will be even more obvious to spot, so they will monopolize women even more.

Superficiality is part of human nature because looks used to send hard to fake signals about your genetic quality. Foids will still have it just as easy, there are enough men who would happily go for a flat-chested girl, every subtype of women has male admirers. It will be men who will be hit hardest. Women want to show off what they got, and they do so at every opportunity, because they know there will always be buyers for it.

I think it would make a very big difference. Especially if you banned things like makeup.


View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kIetaBycOhA


Here you can see how makeup can transform ugly cunts into absolute dream women. This shit needs to be banned just like clothing. Then people see who they are really dealing with. You see the people around you as they really are.

 

[OutcompetedByRoomba]

I think it would make a very big difference. Especially if you banned things like makeup.


View: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/kIetaBycOhA


Here you can see how makeup can transform ugly cunts into absolute dream women. This shit needs to be banned just like clothing. Then people see who they are really dealing with. You see the people around you as they really are.

make up is another matter. Banning that will probably have some meassurable positive effects on hoeflation. Though again, it can't beat out the underlying fundamental difference in attraction, only dampen the impact somewhat.