Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Conscious awareness really does have affect on particles.

R

ryhan

Julias dracul romanov the 2 eyed abyss
★★★★★
Joined
May 20, 2019
Posts
4,460
Your awareness of a particle really does have an affect on the movement of a wave function so the double slit experiment say's when a particle passes through 2 slits it should act like particle and go through 2 slits but instead it acts like light or a wave it starts creating a interference pattern when not observed which set out a shocking revaltion a particles can behave as particles or waves that gave rise to the dualistic view of eletrons protons but when observed the wave function literally seemed to act like a particle again when being observed by a conscious user and their seems to be a correlation between the 2 know the argument could be correlation does not equal causation which to be fair is a good point but we can repeat this experiment and the findings sure enough did follow from the premise.

P1 Electrons are dualistic they can be both a wave and a particle.
P2 electron's when not being observed act as a wave.
P3 when being observed electrons act as a particle
P4 the interference pattern in a electron acts as a particle when being observed which means it become's smaller.
P5 human conscious thought has an affect on a electron.
conclusion if we were to redo this experiment consious observation should make sure every time that the interfereance pattern went smaller when observed and sure enough it did.

A double-slit optical system was used to test the possible role of consciousness in the
collapse of the quantum wavefunction. The ratio of the interference pattern’s double-slit spectral
power to its single-slit spectral power was predicted to decrease when attention was focused toward
the double slit as compared to away from it. Each test session consisted of 40 counterbalanced
attention-toward and attention-away epochs, where each epoch lasted between 15 and 30 s. Data
contributed by 137 people in six experiments, involving a total of 250 test sessions, indicate that on
average the spectral ratio decreased as predicted (z=-4:36, p=6·10-6). Another 250 control
sessions conducted without observers present tested hardware, software, and analytical procedures
for potential artifacts; none were identified (z=0:43, p=0:67). Variables including temperature,
vibration, and signal drift were also tested, and no spurious influences were identified. By contrast,
factors associated with consciousness, such as meditation experience, electrocortical markers of
focused attention, and psychological factors including openness and absorption, significantly
correlated in predicted ways with perturbations in the double-slit interference pattern. The results
appear to be consistent with a consciousness-related interpretation of the quantum measurement
problem.







This is not psedo sciece i take a different view than the conclusion provided that consciousness lead's to the change i think it's more the particle is conscious itself same with wave's in the physic's context i think all particles are a part of the mind of god vibrations are a part of the mind of god we are all part's of the greater one we are all technically projection of god we are all in the platonic mind of god.


P1 The world is made of quantum bit's.
P2 those quantum bits change when being observed.
P3 those quantum bit's change specifically when observed by a human.
P4 we have 250 repeated experiments proving it is when conscious thoughts are applied.
P5 at the quantum level everything is conscious.
P6 the universe as a whole then follows at-least at the quantum level is conscious.
P7 god is a super quantum mind or computer could be either.
P8 we are in the mind of god.
 
Particles me.
 
this sounds crazy man
 

Similar threads

SecularNeo-Khazar
Replies
14
Views
361
Rabbi Schneerson
Rabbi Schneerson
Redbeard7
Replies
1
Views
130
copemaxx9002
copemaxx9002
zalikell.ir.ilxyne:
Replies
17
Views
274
copemaxx9002
copemaxx9002
sweet.trip
Replies
30
Views
240
Emba
Emba

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top