Battlefield did the same shit with WW1 weapons. And normies were screaming "wow this ww1 setting is so great, full immersion!"
Wasnt that bad in BF1 witch I hate BF1 actually. BF1 is shit to me. BF4 is way better of a game then BF1. But yeah it wasnt as crazy out of whack like it is in BO6. At this point BO6 is more of a game to get drunk playing and not hold anything sacred. There better off as how they were at the last. Infact they are probably better off with the old quake 2 engine even today. And make the games like a real cod then what they are now.
Sloppy shooters anyways. There is no tactics there is nothing realistic. Is just a sort of nerf game with textures of real weapons. Cod and battlefield and all that slop cant be further away from real war or any class of armed operation.
Yet you still bought the slop...
COD has never really been about being realistic
Weak argument. COD had a good balance of fast gameplay and with boots-on-the-ground combat. Of course, it was unrealistic, but just because you like unrealistic mechanisms in game doesn't mean you like the excess of it, and that goes for everything in life.
Last edited:
The operators are more cringe. Foids have ruined gaming. Imagine being a grown ass man and playing as a pink haired lesbian foid. What happened to the characters being real men like Woods, Mason, Reznov etc
, on the bright side I guess at least you get to shoot and blow up said pink hair dykes
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
