Clown World: Physicist accuses 'white men in North America' Wikipedia editors of sexism for removing female scientists

[Kent]

A physicist who added hundreds of biographies for female scientists to Wikipedia has expressed her shock after seeing a number of them removed because they weren't considered prominent enough to stay on the site. As a result some were taken down with editors giving them a tag 'saying they weren't notable.' 'I've been told that I'm diluting the site by putting these profiles up,' Wade said.

LOL. She probably spammed the site with so many foid secretaries who technically did work on the projects by arranging files that she thought it was notable. This is the futureisfemale though. No matter what a foid does, it will be immediately given credit as noteworthy and rise to the top.

Cliffs: We do the same thing with Children's Art...straight to prominent display on the refrigerator.

Physicist shocked after female scientist Wikipedia entries removed

Dr Jess Wade has written around 800 biographies for the online encyclopedia. Last week 50 of Dr Wade's entries were flagged by Wikipedia editors for not being notable enough to stay on the site.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[desperatecel178]

Based.

 

[TheSecondComing]

so 50 of 800? what the hell is she crying about?

 

[78980n]

Cliffs: We do the same thing with Children's Art...straight to prominent display on the refrigerator.

Good analogy.

 

[Kent]

so 50 of 800? what the hell is she crying about?

Yeah I noticed that too. Apparently what she is really saying is that NO FOID can be eliminated after getting added to the site by a group of editors....think of that??? What are the implications for scientific discovery if this is the case...one group gets carte blanche entry into credibility??

 

[ThouShallObeyKing]

id like to see what examples were removed and why they are considered a scientist

my page was deleted too from wikipedia..

 

[FinnCel]

Men will do all the work and women will take credit for it

 

[Lester]

Based.

 

[Of Manlets and Men]

That cunt doesn't give a fuck about actual science. She's all about ME ME ME MUH WOMYN'S RIGHTS WAHH WAHH ONLY 750 OF MUH 800 FOID PROFILES WERE ACCEPTED IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN 6 MILLION, WOE IS ME.

The sheer level of ego on that bitch is sickening.

 

[Deleted member 22907]

Based.

750 are still up. Not based.

 

[Deleted member 21514]

Retarded cunt

 

[lightskin2thousand0]

based raccon hat wearers and cowboys

 

[Deleted member 21883]

What the heck does gender have to do with science? Do you use your penis to type code? Do you transport fossil bones in your vagina? Do you use your breasts to advance a cutting tool? Bloody morons.

 

[Deleted member 17245]

Look at her face, look at her eyes. That's the face of a woman who is constantly thinking about killing and devouring the souls of men.

 

[Kent]

What the heck does gender have to do with science?

Maybe if you lose that misogynistic attitude you might actually get some pussy, inkwell!


Cliffs: Irony in how foids say they are more than sexual objects but chastise men who can't get laid

 

[Emba]

Cliffs: Push the crazy lady off
Them

 

[retard_supreme0]

Wikipedia is pozzed beyond belief, lmao. I'm surprised that any of them were removed.

 

[what is happening]

id like to see what examples were removed and why they are considered a scientist

my page was deleted too from wikipedia..

Here's a specific example that they bitched about.

Here's why it got deleted:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Clarice_Phelps_(2nd_nomination)

Delete (summoned by ping above), for the same reason I gave the last time: "I'm sorry, but if she's notable, then so must thousands of others who worked on large multinational scientific projects, as Icewhiz wrote. The tennessine article rightly does not mention her, as otherwise it would get bogged down listing hundreds and thousands of names." Also per R8R's comment in the previous AfD ***Articles for Deletion***. Double sharp (talk) 06:58, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

This is the comment he's referencing: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Clarice_Phelps

Delete From reading this discussion and the article, I do not exactly understand why this scientist is considered notable. As per the article's lead section, the main reason is that she was on a team that provided a target for the discovery of element 117. To make that entirely clear: she did not discover a chemical element and she wasn't a part of the team that made the discovery. The discoverers were those who conducted the experiment in Russia in 2009--2010 and those who later analyzed the data obtained in that experiment. She was a part of the team that provided necessary equipment for that discovery, nothing less but nothing more. While that was indeed of crucial importance for the discovery (though not a part of it), I don't see how that makes everybody involved in making the target personally notable. She was not even the leader of that group. If there ever was a person of notability gained from that alone, that would be Joseph Hamilton (I will note that he does not have a Wikipedia article for whatever reason). If that is the reason why she has an article at all (and it appears to me it is), then my judgment is that she does not pass WP:GNG ***General Notability Guideline***. If there is nothing she has done that passes GNG, then the sum of what she has done does not have her pass it either (though it may be the reason for somebody to give her enough coverage that would help pass it).
I plead to everyone not to use Wikipedia as a means to make a sociopolitical statement, however noble your intentions may be. Wikipedia is meant to be neutral, and that it should be. We're not writing a new edition of the Great Soviet Encyclopedia. On this ground, I advise against invocation of WP:IAR. ***"Ignore All Rules" (If a rule prevents you from improving or maintaining Wikipedia, ignore it.) Often used as a "reason" to keep shit articles like this when it clearly doesn't meet the notability guidelines.***--R8R (talk) 04:23, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

 

[Monk of Failure]

Lifefuel

 

[PPEcel]

800 biographies.

Only 50 of them were flagged for deletion.

 

[CrackingYs]

id like to see what examples were removed and why they are considered a scientist

Foids consider fucking their professors and getting put on a resesrch team as being a "scientist". Meanwhile the actual scientists do the actual work and give the foids a participation award, when really they are just participating the same way a cheerleader participates in a game of football.