Blackpill Claiming that dating is primarily about personality implies that victims of domestic violence are at fault for choosing an abusive partner

[Neurotic]

The argument goes that incels are incels because of our bad personalities and the fact that we post misogynistic things on the internet. When asked how women in real life would know about our anonymous online activities, proponents of said argument typically respond by claiming that our misogynistic attitudes show through subtle behavioural signs that can be "sensed" by the women around us.

Ok. Let's assume that was true. This would mean that women are extremely sensitive to any indicator of a "bad personality" and manage to sort out men having such "bad personalities" with astounding accuracy, to a point that even someone who merely shitposts on obscure incel forums a few times a week immediately strikes them as a disgusting misogynist despite seemingly acting like a normie on the outside.

This would then also apply to potential domestic abusers. Since women are so great and infallible at picking up on personality traits, a man who'd lay his hands on a woman would also easily be identified as such, yet women still end up dating these men. Therefore, they voluntarily enter abusive relationship with men they know are abusive.

Common sense dictates that the consequences of voluntarily putting yourself in situations you know will carry said negative consequences are your own fault, and thus victims of domestic abuse are at fault for their own supposed victimhood, according to the "incels are incels because of their bad personalities" argument.

So, bluepillers, make your choice: Admit that your argument is based on incorrect prepositions and is therefore invalid, or accept the notion that abuse victims are at fault for their own abuse as a logical consequence of your argument.

 

[DespressedCurryCel1]

The argument goes that incels are incels because of our bad personalities and the fact that we post misogynistic things on the internet. When asked how women in real life would know about our anonymous online activities, proponents of said argument typically respond by claiming that our misogynistic attitudes show through subtle behavioural signs that can be "sensed" by the women around us.

Ok. Let's assume that was true. This would mean that women are extremely sensitive to any indicator of a "bad personality" and manage to sort out men having such "bad personalities" with astounding accuracy, to a point that even someone who merely shitposts on obscure incel forums a few times a week immediately strikes them as a disgusting misogynist despite seemingly acting like a normie on the outside.

This would then also apply to potential domestic abusers. Since women are so great and infallible at picking up on personality traits, a man who'd lay his hands on a woman would also easily be identified as such, yet women still end up dating these men. Therefore, they voluntarily enter abusive relationship with men they know are abusive.

Common sense dictates that the consequences of voluntarily putting yourself in situations you know will carry said negative consequences are your own fault, and thus victims of domestic abuse are at fault for their own supposed victimhood, according to the "incels are incels because of their bad personalities" argument.

So, bluepillers, make your choice: Admit that your argument is based on incorrect prepositions and is therefore invalid, or accept the notion that abuse victims are at fault for their own abuse as a logical consequence of your argument.

High IQ post

 

[Cuck-Damage]

They are at fault

 

[Intellau_Celistic]

Re: most misandry is from men

Unintelligent_Anon Join Date: 2016-02-24 Post Count: 361

#184645830Wednesday, March 02, 2016 12:56 PM CST "most" is the correct term to use. Fifty percent stems from male interaction, and it is irrelevant to what you describe. Misandry is the result of a gyno-centric society. Females are not superior to males.

 

[Zhou Chang-Xing]

The argument goes that incels are incels because of our bad personalities and the fact that we post misogynistic things on the internet. When asked how women in real life would know about our anonymous online activities, proponents of said argument typically respond by claiming that our misogynistic attitudes show through subtle behavioural signs that can be "sensed" by the women around us.

Ok. Let's assume that was true. This would mean that women are extremely sensitive to any indicator of a "bad personality" and manage to sort out men having such "bad personalities" with astounding accuracy, to a point that even someone who merely shitposts on obscure incel forums a few times a week immediately strikes them as a disgusting misogynist despite seemingly acting like a normie on the outside.

This would then also apply to potential domestic abusers. Since women are so great and infallible at picking up on personality traits, a man who'd lay his hands on a woman would also easily be identified as such, yet women still end up dating these men. Therefore, they voluntarily enter abusive relationship with men they know are abusive.

Common sense dictates that the consequences of voluntarily putting yourself in situations you know will carry said negative consequences are your own fault, and thus victims of domestic abuse are at fault for their own supposed victimhood, according to the "incels are incels because of their bad personalities" argument.

So, bluepillers, make your choice: Admit that your argument is based on incorrect prepositions and is therefore invalid, or accept the notion that abuse victims are at fault for their own abuse as a logical consequence of your argument.

Toilets are the selectors, they have 100% all of the power in all relationships. So, if a man "abuses" a toilet it is 100% her agency and SHE chooses to be in that relationship. Abuse is if a man gets abused, a toilet getting "abused" is her choice.

I stand by it when I say that no man in the history of mankind has ever "abused" a toilet, that is impossible as toilets are the selectors of sex. They choose everything that happens to them and no interaction between a man and toilet happens without the consent of the toilet. If she didn't like it she would have dumped him on day 1 or not selected him.

This is why any "abuse" by a male towards a female should be decriminalised, men don't select their partners, we simply get who we can get, but toilets actively select their partners. A

 

[Cope or die]

You're trying to apply logic to the personality argument. Foid logic is non-existent.

 

[Mayocel]

They are at least partially at fault because of a thing called "personal responsibility".

If a white dude goes to a black ghetto and gets beaten up or killed, or someone leaves their keys in their car and it gets stolen, those people share a part of the blame due to their bad decisions.

People saying that abuse victims carry no responsibility are merely facilitating an environment in which foids can absolve themselves of any responsibility and keep making bad decisions, because they know that someone will be there to save them.

You can usually spot an abuser fairly early on in a relationship if you look out for any abnormal behaviors, or even just take note when a person treats others like shit. Most likely, they will turn their wrath on you soon enough.

 

[Govid_Dorious]

 

[52baldcurryjanitor]

I have a theory that a lot of domestic violence is where most betabux guys don't marry the woman they want, but rather some ex CC rider who they are FORCED to settle with! Over the years the anger/resentment builds up until they EXPLODE and just start beating the bitch!

 

[subhuman]

Personality detector broken