Yes.
Hail Satan 666
True Christians are a minority, Christianity is only a "major religion" on paper. Most just claim that label while doing anal and giving blow jobs before marriage, being total soyboy cucks and doing it to virtue signal.
While I generally think they're a bit nuts, check out the Westboro Baptist Church teachings. That's real Christianity.
No, that was thanks to old school societal structures that just so happened to sometimes have faith based laws. It's the times we live in man, plain and simple... even many Islamic countries are being slowly corroded by modern feminism and other trends for example. I blame big tech mostly.
Oh, fuck that. Don't say things just to be a contrarian. They would kick your ugly ass out of their church so fast... I guarantee you they're also anti anime, anti balckpill, anti a lot of stuff incels and many others tend to like... don't coon for them. They hate you too.
Mind to ellab ?
If you have a verbal iq above eighty-five you'll be able to intuitively reason that I never said I supported the Church. They're most definitely not "anti-blackpill" from what I've seen, however. If you know how to do any of your own research their whole political message is that the west is fucked because of all this degeneracy and self-indulgence. E.g., Lookism. Anime is retarded and I hate it too. Anime is literally disgusting and degenerate in itself. I don't need to be a religious fanatic to figure this out.
Why go to church when foids are pastors and Catholics whorship a whore ?
Yeah you can make that point just fine without propping up the WBC. That's what I was driving out. And by anti blackpill I meant they would never indulge in such a movement or allow their members to. They're a cult who probably sits around the fireside doing bible studies all night, you bring up lookism etc. around them, they'll probably call you a heretic or a warlock or something. I get you don't support them as in you want to join them or anything, but it's unnecessary to say anything positive about them at all.
It's really not unnecessary, especially when we're running out of solutions. Whether or not they'd sacrifice me to some obscure cannibalistic tradition because im pointing out the obvious societal heresy is irrelevant to me. They're a group with strong ideals. I don't support them, but in this era that's admirable. I'm pretty sure they'd obviously recognize that lookism massively contributes to societal ills and denial of divine intervention in life. They are certainly not grounded in logic but they aren't wrong either. Deadly times demand strong solutions. And no, just like any Christian organization they're surprisingly open to criticism and allowing new members to join, especially if they've faced some kind of hardship. They'd gladly accept incels as a demographic because its smart. Remember the people obsessed with look ideality are the heretics, not the people that recognize it. Do I support or even endorse it? No. Is it something I would blame you for joining? Absolutely not.
There you go sucking their dicks again. Smh. I just hate cults is all, you should too.
I only suck my own dick when it comes to who I ultimately care about right now.
I agree but this question comes off a little pseudo-intellectualesque. All that really matters is that whether or not it's true, it ought to simply satisfy the moral grounds of humanity.
Yeah, you're still in poor judgement if you massively downgrade the importance of theocracy.
If you question somethings validity it has a greater chance of not being true. The truth isn't the end all be all when it comes to maintaining a greater goal. Virtuous establishment is of far more importance in the long run than getting a gf.
I've been massively downgrading the importance of theocracy almost my whole life. It's retarded, highly unnatural slavery.
Lookists would agree. "muh this absurd system is stopping me from fucking whoever I want."
Lookists have been around since the garden of eden.
Within the Christian frame, what is good is established by communication from God, not reference to the material world. So whether or not Christianity seems to map well to what humans like and dislike in the material world is not a problem for Christianity.
What do you mean by your second sentence?
The second sentence is clear. If it's true it's true if it's false it's false but none of that matters. If it satisfies the moral framework nature is based upon then it's useful. Your first statement is more theocratic rather than secular. A secular view of Christianity depends on someone's dependence on faith. Even if someone blindly follows faith to the bitter end they'll end up benefiting the material world if that envisioned world is seen as good under a state. The state can still be secular.
The truth of the doctrine certainly does matter if the stakes are death and resurrection.
ok man
Nature has framework that justifies our behavior. In that view, we know what is and isn't moral. What is and isn't degenerate. First point is something im not debating with and so is third.
OK please be the first guy in history to show the proof that the material world demonstrates moral value.
It's simple.
The fact that humans experience a preference for a given thing is not proof that that thing is right.
That thing your refering to isn't a preference. Vaginal penetration leads to the bearing of children. That i something we're organically progammed to do. Preference interferes when people distort the feelings of gratification associated with the moral act of vaginal penetration which produces a desirable outcome. The only part that isn't logical in framework is the pleasure component. If a particular ideology distorts this purpose, then pleasure becomes useless. Pleasure is simply nature's toy.
Well,two opposite beliefs cant be both true at the same time
If only tech was being used for other things than elevation of certain groups.
