Why chess specifically, you ask? After all, there is no doubt that men excel at every mental virtue.
For example, I used to work as a mathematician at a university. This is a male activity, and indeed in my years I have never once encountered a woman that I considered a good mathematician.
But the problem is that I cannot in any realistic way quantise this observation. There isn't a measure of what makes a good mathematician --- I just know by experience. And what's worse is that the globohomo agenda severely meddles with any objective representation, as women are invariably given preferential treatment, and their accomplishments are always blown out of proportion.
Chess, however, is different: There is a very clear measure of who is better --- you simply let them play against each other --- and more significantly, no amount of feminist intervention can influence these outcomes. And the outcomes don't lie: Every top player is male. The entire top ranking is male. There is even a title of Woman Grandmaster because the ordinary Grandmaster title is just too much to ask for. (There are 38 female true GMs compared to 1904 male GMs, kek.)
Surely, if you point this out to a bluepilled individual, they will invariably come up with some bullshit: "But there's fewer women in chess!" "But muh misogynist environment!" You name it. But I don't care --- chess is clear-cut proof for anyone with a functioning brain, and that settles it.
For example, I used to work as a mathematician at a university. This is a male activity, and indeed in my years I have never once encountered a woman that I considered a good mathematician.
But the problem is that I cannot in any realistic way quantise this observation. There isn't a measure of what makes a good mathematician --- I just know by experience. And what's worse is that the globohomo agenda severely meddles with any objective representation, as women are invariably given preferential treatment, and their accomplishments are always blown out of proportion.
Chess, however, is different: There is a very clear measure of who is better --- you simply let them play against each other --- and more significantly, no amount of feminist intervention can influence these outcomes. And the outcomes don't lie: Every top player is male. The entire top ranking is male. There is even a title of Woman Grandmaster because the ordinary Grandmaster title is just too much to ask for. (There are 38 female true GMs compared to 1904 male GMs, kek.)
Surely, if you point this out to a bluepilled individual, they will invariably come up with some bullshit: "But there's fewer women in chess!" "But muh misogynist environment!" You name it. But I don't care --- chess is clear-cut proof for anyone with a functioning brain, and that settles it.
