Here's a refined version of your theory:
Feminists might be repressing a latent fascination with the incel community. My theory is based on the following points:
1. **Projection of Attraction**: Feminists often promote the idea that strong negative feelings towards something might indicate a hidden attraction to it. For example, they suggest that homophobes might be closet homosexuals. This could be a form of projection, reflecting their own covert interest in the incel community.
2. **Nurturing Advice**: Despite their often critical stance towards men in general, feminists frequently offer advice on how incels can attract women. Given that women are not a monolith, this advice might be more reflective of their own preferences and what would attract them personally.
3. **Preoccupation with Sexual Desires**: Feminists frequently discuss and cross-post incels' sexual fantasies on their forums. This intense focus on incel sexuality, and the anger that arises when they don't meet incels' standards, suggests a deeper, perhaps repressed, interest in what incels
desire.
4. **Moral Superiority Complex**: Feminists often engage in discussions about incels from a position of moral superiority, which can mask underlying curiosity or attraction. This dynamic can create a psychological barrier, where the fascination is rationalized as a form of social justice or advocacy, rather than personal interest.
5. **Paradoxical Attention**: The significant amount of time and energy spent by feminists discussing incels, beyond what would be expected from mere disapproval, might indicate a deeper, paradoxical interest. This disproportionate attention could suggest that incels occupy a more prominent place in their thoughts than they might consciously admit.
(I thought this was a great point, IT and feminists spend hours a day talking about us which is a lot for a group you don’t have sexual attraction to)
6. **Fantasy of Reform**: There is a recurring theme of feminists wanting to "fix" or "reform" incels, which could be driven by a subconscious desire to engage with and transform these men. This fantasy of transformation might be a way to reconcile their attraction with them.
(Kinda falls into point 3)
7. **Mirror of Extremes**: The incel and feminist communities often exist at opposite extremes of the gender discourse. This polarity can create a magnetic attraction, as each side represents what the other vehemently opposes, leading to a complex interplay of repulsion and fascination.
I obviously don’t seriously believe this , but it’s a funny shitpost that might get some Bluepillers angry
Feminists might be repressing a latent fascination with the incel community. My theory is based on the following points:
1. **Projection of Attraction**: Feminists often promote the idea that strong negative feelings towards something might indicate a hidden attraction to it. For example, they suggest that homophobes might be closet homosexuals. This could be a form of projection, reflecting their own covert interest in the incel community.
2. **Nurturing Advice**: Despite their often critical stance towards men in general, feminists frequently offer advice on how incels can attract women. Given that women are not a monolith, this advice might be more reflective of their own preferences and what would attract them personally.
3. **Preoccupation with Sexual Desires**: Feminists frequently discuss and cross-post incels' sexual fantasies on their forums. This intense focus on incel sexuality, and the anger that arises when they don't meet incels' standards, suggests a deeper, perhaps repressed, interest in what incels
desire.
4. **Moral Superiority Complex**: Feminists often engage in discussions about incels from a position of moral superiority, which can mask underlying curiosity or attraction. This dynamic can create a psychological barrier, where the fascination is rationalized as a form of social justice or advocacy, rather than personal interest.
5. **Paradoxical Attention**: The significant amount of time and energy spent by feminists discussing incels, beyond what would be expected from mere disapproval, might indicate a deeper, paradoxical interest. This disproportionate attention could suggest that incels occupy a more prominent place in their thoughts than they might consciously admit.
(I thought this was a great point, IT and feminists spend hours a day talking about us which is a lot for a group you don’t have sexual attraction to)
6. **Fantasy of Reform**: There is a recurring theme of feminists wanting to "fix" or "reform" incels, which could be driven by a subconscious desire to engage with and transform these men. This fantasy of transformation might be a way to reconcile their attraction with them.
(Kinda falls into point 3)
7. **Mirror of Extremes**: The incel and feminist communities often exist at opposite extremes of the gender discourse. This polarity can create a magnetic attraction, as each side represents what the other vehemently opposes, leading to a complex interplay of repulsion and fascination.
I obviously don’t seriously believe this , but it’s a funny shitpost that might get some Bluepillers angry
