SlayerSlayer
Luminary
★★★★★
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2018
- Posts
- 10,030
- Online
- 80d 19h 56m
I think the number of Tinder matches a man receives in a week is the most objective data possible in order to judge male beauty. For straight, single, hetero men- only the opinions of 18+ aged, sexually active/fertile women that are into guys matter. The latter women are on Tinder. I don't fucking care, what jailbait, deeply religious, lesbians, or what your grandma thinks makes a man handsome- these people skew the data. In Hot or Not, you get a sense that there's a lot of SJW upvoting going on by uggos- where sometimes you can get a decent score there, but never get tinder matches.
We as a community have a pretty strong sense of what makes someone 8/10+. If you're below a 3 that's kind of obvious too. There is so much grey area though on what features make you on the range of 3-6. There's a lot of mystery on what makes an upper or lower tier normie, Overall, it's just nice to attach an objective number to one's beauty. It would be nice for one to say, because I only get 10 Tinder matches a week, that makes me a 4/10.
I think the easiest way to generate what I am after is something like this:
A looks scale, instead of just saying these people are 9, or 8 willy nilly, also include adjacent to those numbers for example that 9's generate x number of Tinder matches per week. This is not a great looks scale, because it's all white people. In my dream looks scale, at every level of looks, we should include every ethnicity. Here are some caveats to the race thing- that I know you're all thinking about. Say no asian men reach a 9/10, because the hottest asian man we can possibly find a photo of did not get the required number of matches. Then in that level, the bracket will just have an empty space that says "according to this study NO ASIAN MEN meet the number of required tinder matches to be a 9/10." I think every race has a man ugly enough to have 0 tinder matches, but I want to to be as representative as possible.
Since there are so many permutations of mixed race vs. pure-bred people to possibly include I think we need to just slot things racially as follows:
For every level, 10 slots divided into seprate columns to showcase the evolution of your race go up and down the scale:
1 non-ginger white / castizo
1 ginger
1 black/abo
1 asian
1 south east asian/ pacific islander
1 curry
1 mestizo hispanic/ native american
1 arab/ armenian
2 wildcard biracial slots
A big part of the project will be collecting believable photos, and delivering them to the Chadfishers so they can run the experiments. We need to have a PM thread so infiltrators wont mess up the project.
EDIT: Made another mock up of what this might look like:
We as a community have a pretty strong sense of what makes someone 8/10+. If you're below a 3 that's kind of obvious too. There is so much grey area though on what features make you on the range of 3-6. There's a lot of mystery on what makes an upper or lower tier normie, Overall, it's just nice to attach an objective number to one's beauty. It would be nice for one to say, because I only get 10 Tinder matches a week, that makes me a 4/10.
I think the easiest way to generate what I am after is something like this:
A looks scale, instead of just saying these people are 9, or 8 willy nilly, also include adjacent to those numbers for example that 9's generate x number of Tinder matches per week. This is not a great looks scale, because it's all white people. In my dream looks scale, at every level of looks, we should include every ethnicity. Here are some caveats to the race thing- that I know you're all thinking about. Say no asian men reach a 9/10, because the hottest asian man we can possibly find a photo of did not get the required number of matches. Then in that level, the bracket will just have an empty space that says "according to this study NO ASIAN MEN meet the number of required tinder matches to be a 9/10." I think every race has a man ugly enough to have 0 tinder matches, but I want to to be as representative as possible.
Since there are so many permutations of mixed race vs. pure-bred people to possibly include I think we need to just slot things racially as follows:
For every level, 10 slots divided into seprate columns to showcase the evolution of your race go up and down the scale:
1 non-ginger white / castizo
1 ginger
1 black/abo
1 asian
1 south east asian/ pacific islander
1 curry
1 mestizo hispanic/ native american
1 arab/ armenian
2 wildcard biracial slots
A big part of the project will be collecting believable photos, and delivering them to the Chadfishers so they can run the experiments. We need to have a PM thread so infiltrators wont mess up the project.
EDIT: Made another mock up of what this might look like:
Last edited:
